2008-09 Connecticut High School Hockey Rankings

Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations. 

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Fairfield Prep,CT,__________________ 12  4  1,  0   1.8,   9.1,  10.96, 11.08 
  2,Trinity Catholic,CT,________________ 18  2  0,  4   2.7,   7.7,  10.43,  9.71 
  3,Hamden,CT,__________________________ 13  4  1,  0   0.9,   8.6,   9.53,  8.50 
  4,Notre Dame-Fairfield,CT,____________ 15  4  1,  0   1.2,   8.3,   9.52,  9.49 
  5,Simsbury,CT,________________________ 14  4  1,  2   1.6,   7.9,   9.45,  9.68 
  6,West Haven,CT,______________________ 10  9  0,  1   0.5,   8.5,   8.96,  9.27 
  7,Fermi,CT,___________________________ 14  4  0,  0   1.5,   7.4,   8.93,  9.34 
  8,Xavier,CT,__________________________ 10  7  0,  1   0.8,   8.1,   8.90,  8.81 
  9,Glastonbury,CT,_____________________ 13  5  1,  0   1.5,   7.3,   8.82,  8.54 
 10,Enfield,CT,_________________________ 14  4  0,  1   1.7,   7.0,   8.68,  8.60 
 11,Greenwich,CT,_______________________ 12  5  3,  1   1.3,   7.2,   8.51,  8.46 
 12,New Canaan,CT,______________________ 10  7  3,  1   0.5,   8.0,   8.45,  9.21 
 13,Notre Dame-West Haven,CT,___________  8  9  1,  0  -0.4,   8.8,   8.43,  9.21 
 14,North Haven,CT,_____________________  9  6  2,  0   0.2,   8.2,   8.35,  8.79 
 15,Tri-Town,CT,________________________ 12  6  1,  1   0.9,   7.2,   8.12,  6.34 
 16,Cheshire,CT,________________________ 15  2  2,  1   1.7,   6.4,   8.09,  7.75 
 17,Branford,CT,________________________ 12  5  1,  2   1.1,   6.9,   8.07,  9.09 
 18,Darien,CT,__________________________ 11  6  3,  1   0.1,   8.0,   8.06,  8.65 
 19,East Haven,CT,______________________ 10  6  1,  1   0.6,   7.4,   7.97,  8.51 
 20,Staples-Weston,CT,__________________ 12  8  0,  2   1.2,   6.6,   7.86,  8.97 
 21,Amity,CT,___________________________ 12  6  0,  1   0.8,   7.0,   7.81,  7.69 
 22,Ridgefield,CT,______________________  8 11  1,  1  -0.1,   7.8,   7.79,  7.58 
 23,Conard,CT,__________________________  9  8  1,  0  -0.2,   7.8,   7.61,  7.42 
 24,South Windsor,CT,___________________  6 12  1,  0  -0.6,   8.1,   7.53,  8.62 
 25,Avon,CT,____________________________  9  8  1,  0   0.0,   7.2,   7.25,  6.80 
 26,Hall-Southington,CT,________________ 14  2  2,  4   1.9,   5.2,   7.16,  7.09 
 27,Lyman Hall,CT,______________________ 13  4  0,  2   1.0,   6.1,   7.12,  6.36 
 28,Suffield-Granby-Windsor Locks,CT,___ 12  6  0,  1   0.9,   6.1,   7.08,  6.78 
 29,St Joseph,CT,_______________________ 12  7  1,  0   0.4,   6.6,   7.01,  5.14 
 30,Daniel Hand,CT,_____________________  5 11  1,  0  -0.9,   7.9,   6.91,  8.01 
 31,Stamford,CT,________________________ 11  8  1,  0   0.3,   6.5,   6.85,  6.78 
 32,East Catholic,CT,___________________  9  9  1,  0  -0.1,   6.9,   6.76,  6.11 
 33,Fairfield Warde/Ludlowe,CT,_________  7 11  2,  0  -0.4,   7.0,   6.61,  7.47 
 34,St Bernard-Bacon,CT,________________ 10  9  0,  1   0.5,   6.1,   6.55,  6.63 
 35,Farmington,CT,______________________  5 13  1,  0  -0.9,   7.4,   6.52,  6.03 
 36,Guilford,CT,________________________ 13  6  0,  4   0.9,   5.6,   6.44,  7.18 
 37,Immaculate,CT,______________________  4 15  0,  0  -2.0,   8.3,   6.34,  6.11 
 38,Bethel-Brookfield-Danbury,CT,_______ 14  4  0,  0   1.3,   4.9,   6.25,  6.71 
 39,Northwest Catholic,CT,______________ 12  4  1,  3   0.1,   6.0,   6.18,  6.49 
 40,Housatonic-Northwestern,CT,_________ 11  8  0,  0   0.1,   6.0,   6.06,  7.07 
 41,North Branford,CT,__________________  4 13  1,  0  -1.6,   7.6,   5.96,  6.04 
 42,New Milford,CT,_____________________  8 12  0,  0  -0.2,   6.0,   5.85,  6.21 
 43,Rocky Hill-RHAM,CT,_________________  9  8  2,  0   0.4,   5.4,   5.78,  5.70 
 44,Joel Barlow,CT,_____________________ 12  7  0,  1   0.7,   5.0,   5.67,  5.74 
 45,Trumbull,CT,________________________  6 12  1,  1  -0.9,   6.5,   5.62,  5.12 
 46,Westhill,CT,________________________  4 15  1,  1  -1.4,   6.9,   5.58,  4.50 
 47,Wilton,CT,__________________________  7 12  0,  1  -0.9,   6.4,   5.41,  4.55 
 48,Rockville-Manchester,CT,____________  7 11  0,  0  -0.4,   5.4,   4.92,  4.44 
 49,Masuk,CT,___________________________  9  9  0,  0  -0.4,   5.3,   4.89,  5.54 
 50,Watertown-Pomperaug,CT,_____________  6 11  1,  0  -0.9,   5.8,   4.89,  4.36 
 51,Wethersfield,CT,____________________  3 15  1,  1  -2.2,   7.1,   4.86,  4.95 
 52,Newington-Berlin,CT,________________  9  9  1,  0  -0.1,   4.9,   4.80,  4.73 
 53,EO Smith-Tolland-Windham,CT,________  7 11  1,  1  -0.2,   4.7,   4.47,  4.74 
 54,Sheehan,CT,_________________________  2 16  0,  0  -2.1,   6.3,   4.25,  3.35 
 55,Milford Coop,CT,____________________  2 15  0,  1  -2.2,   6.3,   4.16,  4.90 
 56,Bolton-Coventry-Lyman Memorial,CT,__  6 12  0,  0  -1.0,   5.0,   3.99,  4.20 
 57,Newtown,CT,_________________________  4 14  0,  3  -1.1,   4.8,   3.62,  3.06 
 58,Shelton,CT,_________________________  3 14  0,  3  -1.0,   4.3,   3.34,  2.87 
 59,Shepaug-Litchfield-Wamogo,CT,_______  5 12  1,  0  -1.3,   4.6,   3.31,  3.05 
 60,Norwalk-McMahon,CT,_________________  0 18  1,  7  -3.2,   5.5,   2.36,  2.87 
 61,Fitch-East Lyme-Ledyard,CT,_________  2 16  0,  9  -2.4,   3.3,   0.90,  1.55 
 62,Windsor-East Granby,CT,_____________  1 18  0,  6  -3.2,   3.3,   0.20,  0.36 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be 
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked 
within 4 goals of each team.