HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

* DISCLAIMER * I am not a player nor parent with any relation to any of the teams in section 3A. After watching southern Minnesota hockey for the last few years, including section 3A playoffs, and reading these forums year after year, I can't wait to see Luverne lose solely because of how bias the p...

One thing that no one seems to realize is that Luverne has no idea how to incorporate systems into their play. Yes, Luverne has good talent but being able to efficiently run systems will trump talent in section 3A. Big cites teams can sometimes win games on talent but there is by no means any player...

The Great 8 Tournament is the tournament to be at. I don't know of another off season tournament that displays higher caliber HS players. I agree that Xposure has fallen in skill level tremendously from what it used to be.

Wow this forum is getting ridiculous. There is no need to bash anyone on this forum. Obviously one or two good players can not win a game. I takes a team to do that. New Ulm showed that on saturday. The first line was flat and the second line stepped it up and scored the goals. Then, Peterson was cl...

Until I see the other players I didn't list above compete and perform well against tough opposition, I am going to stick with my list. This section is extremely weak this year and it's not impressive to put up a lot of points when you play weak opposition. I'm sure multiple New Ulm players will reco...

Section 3A's biggest problem is the depth that all of the teams lack. Year after year we see a few talented players come out of the section, but when these teams with the talented players play better teams they can't compete for 3 full periods. My point is that I don't think that talent is why secti...