HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

hock99 wrote: Besides the point, AL they played great...weather they had competion or not.. they still would have beat any other team. No competion never gets in the way of AL playing. i definitly agree with you. even though they were beating marshall by that much they never let up and still played ...

i just said that albert lea had no competition....and yes i obviously saw that they killed marshall? it could go either way but i happen to be rooting for new ulm to win. dont get your undies in a bundle...jesus.

this is the first chance i've gotten to go on here since thursday. first off im going to say that i am very embarrased to have stuck up for marshall so much the past week, as they lost by 6. i think its been a while that second round of sections has had run time third period. they had 12 seniors who...

yeah and people like you are the reason why marshall plays so hard. everyone doubts them which makes them want to prove something. as for tomorrow....we will see if marshall "decides" to play good. goodluck to both teams.

[quote]synergy_11 wrote: I didnt get to make it down to the game but to me it sounds like Austin is the better team of the two. Does Marshall think that they can just show up any day and play good hockey when they want, well they cant they lost to luverne and they play in the SW Conference the worst...

you guys all act like marshall didnt skate on the bad ice either? it seems as if everyone likes to come up with any bs just to point out that marshall shouldnt have gotten the win. i saw all 3 disallowed goals and i know that refs disallowed the first 2 with good reason. as to the 3rd one i couldnt ...