2006-2007 PeeWee A Game/Scrimmage scores

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

southernfool
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:40 pm

Post by southernfool »

I assume that you are talking about not allowing the league champion to get an automatic bid to regions. My take is this:

1) With the HEP points being factored into the decision to the extent that it is, there is some logic in not allowing the league champion an automatic bid. A team can earn 16 HEP points and be number one even though their record may be worse than 2 or 3 other teams. One solution would be, IF the league champion has the BEST record (not using HEP) they get the automatic bid, otherwise, they get the number 1 seed but still have to do playoffs (a better solution is to eliminate the HEP point counting in standings at all). This year they had the BEST record (with or w/o HEP) so I would have given it to them.

2) The other issue is that teams play an unbalanced schedule (ie. 16 games no matter how many teams at that level). Therefore, a team can have a 'soft' schedule or 'tough' schedule based on luck of the draw when setting up games. One solution, balance the number of games at the A level (and maybe B1 level) so you always play one home and one away. The reason for these levels and not all levels is because of the Region/State potential at these levels. At the PWA level this year, that would mean you had to play 20 games instead of 16. Perhaps shortening the games to 1 hour length would allow you to accomplish that easier without using a lot more ice (16 games @ 75 minutes = 20 games @ 60 minutes).

Either way a balance schedule without HEP points being used in standings makes the league champion an automatic bid to go to regions every time in my book.
SLP/SW Coach
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by SLP/SW Coach »

District 6 - Rd 4
Minnetonka 3 - Burnsville 2 (backdoor)
Apple Valley 4 - Chaska 2 (Semi-Final)

Minnetonka, Apple Valley and Chaska are the 3 D6 teams to move on to the PWA West Region. Seedings yet TBD.
Rhino
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:36 pm

Post by Rhino »

D10 Back Door


Champlin Park 4 - Andover 1
Coon Rapids 3 - Centennial 1 (Centennial bows out of districts, and will have the #2 seed for regions)
SLP/SW Coach
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by SLP/SW Coach »

District 8 - Rd 3 (Backdoor)
Woodbury 3 - Cottage Grove 2 (ot)
Inver Grove 5 - Hastings 2
bme9319
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:28 pm

Post by bme9319 »

Minnetonka 4
Chaska 2
demongoed
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:41 am

Post by demongoed »

A turn around in the tonka/chaska meeting. Anyone see that one?
keepyourheadup
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm

Post by keepyourheadup »

lakeville south 4
lakeville north 2
thorhockey
Posts: 335
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:01 pm

Post by thorhockey »

Tartan over Roseville 2 - 1 in ot Tartan advance to regions plays loser of NSp and Stillwater
SLP/SW Coach
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by SLP/SW Coach »

District 1 - Championship
Washburn 4 - Mpls*Park 3

District 2 - Championship
North St. Paul 2 - Stillwater 1

District 6 - Champ Game #1
Minnetonka 5 - Apple Valley 1
Now Tonka & AV go to the Final Championship game tomorrow.

District 8 - Semi Finals
Rochester 1 - Eagan 0
Lakeville South 4 - Lakeville North 2
SLP/SW Coach
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by SLP/SW Coach »

Anyone know the following scores from 2/24 Saturday?

D3 - Brooklyn Park Vs Maple Grove
D5 - Buffalo Vs River Lakes
D5 - Crow River Vs MAML
D8 - Eagan Vs Inver Grove
Ricky
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Metro

Post by Ricky »

CROW RIVER over MAML, but I don't know what the score was.
tunavichy
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:43 pm
Location: Como area

District 1 A Pee Wee Regional Representatives

Post by tunavichy »

#1 Seed - Washburn
#2 Seed - St. Paul Johnson

Championship Game
Washburn - 4
Mpls. Park - 3

Back Door #2 Seed Game
St. Paul Johnson - 3
Mpls. Park -2
2 Overtimes
Post Reply