In games versus highly ranked teams, it appears one or two top end players win-out over a balanced or deep team. Snodgrass with the game tying and winning goals for her hat trick versus Eagan in the section final last night. 7 goals in 3 games. Though Eagan had a big edge on shots, they could not stop or clear-out Snodgrass.Lace'emUp wrote:Instead of using the term "deep", lets use the term "ranked" teams. Of the ranked AA teams, 16 of the 20 teams have 3 or more players who are double-digits goals (10 of 20 had 4), and all 20 had at least 6 players with double-digit points. Looking at the top 10 in single-A, 8 of 10 teams have at 3 or more players with double-digit goals, and all had at least 6 with double-digit points.thegreatone99 wrote:I think you can look at your so called "deep teams" and see there is one or two players with all the goals and the rest are single digit points. And these two players always happen to be on the same line, easy to shut down if a coach implores the strategy.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Not sure which teams you are watching "great one"... The best metro teams are deep as hell with multiple scoring threats on at least two line.
Stats don't lie
So to have only a couple players who score all the goals on a ranked team is the exception to the rule. Some of the exceptions are Eastview who relies heavily on Sondgrass, Mound View relying on Brodt/Anderson, Red Wing with Heise/Hardyman, and Hughes/Linser who do everything for Centennial.
Ironically, in Section 3AA tomorrow night, #1 seed Eastview (#19 ranked) plays #2 seed Eagan (#16 ranked). Eastview beat Eagan in both regular season matchups. Can Snodgrass do it again (4 goals in the earlier games)? Likewise, in Section 5AA, #2 Centennial (#10 ranked) plays #3 Blaine (#7 ranked). Centennial (2 players) beat Blaine (deep team) in both conference games. Hughes/Linser did all the scoring. Will a deeper bench finally win out, or will 1 or 2 players do it all again?
In the 5AA semi the other night, though they didn't get the game winner, the Hughes/Linser show scored 2 of Centennial's 3 goals to defeat Blaine for a 3rd straight time this year. They had 9 of the 10 goals in the 3 game series. Penalties killed Blaine in the 2nd game, and it did them in again for the section semi-final. Blaine had a deep team with a lot of balanced scoring. But self-discipline got the best of them, and it doesn't appear the coaching staff could find a strategy to stop arguably best 1-2 tandem in the state.
So the origination of my post was in response to the claim that deep teams have only one or two top scoring players, with all others in single-digit points. That account was incorrect - using Blaine, Maple Grove, or many other ranked teams as examples of deep scoring with many in double-digit points. Also incorrect was that coaches can find strategies to stop these top players. A deep team with 2 good lines and 1 decent line cannot roll and match 3 lines well with a team that has a line consisting of one or two top end players (because they go every-other shift).
Let's see if Maple Grove's deep team can edge out Centennial as they did early this year. Or will Maple Grove's bad luck in section play continue over from their time in 6AA? If Maple Grove sticks to their game, and plays good team hockey, they should win this game. But it's all about team play, and coaches taking advantage of defensive mismatches on the ice. It's the only way to beat a team like Centennial (that's what Blake did). Teams like Blaine lost their composure and allowed 2 players to get the best of them for most of the year.
It's section finals time! Let's have fun watching and discussing these games before this board goes into deep sleep for 7 months.