Section 3A

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

h20
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:19 pm

Post by h20 »

hey edger , any time you play someone it COUNTS, Willmar did beat Marshall 6-2, dont pad that stats just to make your home team look good,
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

h20, he got all of those stats off minnesota-scores.net, settle down it will be ok

it was just updated to this:

QRF Rank, Team, QRF, Section W/L/T, Overall W/L/T, Avg for ,Avg Against, Streak

No. 24 Marshall (49.4) 8 1 0 11 2 0 6.0 2.8 Won 4
No. 25 Hutchinson (48.6) 1 1 1 7 4 1 3.8 2.9 Lost 1
No. 22 New Ulm (50.1) 3 1 0 7 5 0 4.6 3.1 Won 2
No. 50 Luverne (33.2) 4 3 0 5 6 0 3.8 5.3 Lost 2
No. 65 Worthington (25.7) 4 4 0 5 6 0 4.9 4.8 Won 2
No. 60 Windom Area (29.4) 5 4 0 5 7 0 5.3 4.3 Lost 3
No. 56 Litchfield (31.5) 1 1 1 3 7 1 3.5 3.1 Lost 4
No. 54 Willmar (32.2) 1 3 0 4 10 0 2.6 3.8 Lost 3
No. 69 Redwood Valley (24.6) 2 4 0 3 8 0 2.9 5.2 Lost 3
No. 82 Fairmont (9.8 ) 2 5 0 2 10 0 2.1 6.1 Won 1
No. 83 Sleepy Eye/St. Mary's/Springfield (9.7) 0 4 0 0 5 0 1.4 8.2 Lost 5
bodangles8
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:26 pm

Post by bodangles8 »

the strenghts of the shedules are SOOOO different though u can't go by those stats it's who each team has played.
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

bodangles8 wrote:the strenghts of the shedules are SOOOO different though u can't go by those stats it's who each team has played.
In our section i don't think stats matter that much at all, who knows what will happen next
innocentbystandered
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:15 pm

Post by innocentbystandered »

What do you rank the teams on strength of schedule then?
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

innocentbystandered wrote:What do you rank the teams on strength of schedule then?
stats :lol:
Coolice
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:01 pm

Post by Coolice »

Any good games tonight?
HockeytownUSA
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:30 pm

Post by HockeytownUSA »

yes, there is the marshall litchfield game...which looks like it should be a good one
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

HockeytownUSA wrote:yes, there is the marshall litchfield game...which looks like it should be a good one
Marshall 6
Litchfield 6

Final/OT

The first two periods it looked like Marshall capitalized on all of their chances where as Litchfield got equal opportunities and could not put the puck in the net.

Third period was kind of the other way around except Litchfield reduced Marshall's chances, and they kept fighting to put the puck in the net.

Shots:

Marshall 22
Litchfield 30
HockeytownUSA
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:30 pm

Post by HockeytownUSA »

literally felt like i watched two different games...the first 2 periods marshall looked great, just was playing good hockey not allowing litch good scoring chances. 3rd period totally different, marshall looked like they just tried to stretch their lead and stop scoring, but litch also came out and showed what kind of fire power they have.
sregit34
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:42 pm

Post by sregit34 »

Wow, i heard Marshall was up 5-1 going into the third!? unbeleivable. Did they just choke or what. Did Litchfields #5 score any? he is a really good player.
mtnet
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:42 pm

Post by mtnet »

You are right. I went to Marshall tonight to see this game as I have not seen Litch play all year. I saw an entertaining game. The best player on the ice tonight was LDC's #5 John Barrick. He has a D1 shot. (Not to be confused with a shot at D1) I spoke out of turn on an earlier post when I said Bergau & Kohn were the best D in the section. I will take Barrick, Hanson, Berry & Sundin any night over anyone I've seen in this section this year. They are solid! Barrick is the best D in the section.

Marshall tried to sit on a 4 goal lead and got buried in the third. Ogdall played two good periods but absolutely quit in the third. Last time I saw Marshall play #6 took some stupid penalties. He did it again tonight. I can't say he lost the game for them but his penalty was a huge factor.

This section is still a crap shoot.
stanryckman
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:05 pm

LDC's D

Post by stanryckman »

these guys solidly gave up 6 goals last night. if that was a good night, i'd hate to see a bad night.
bodangles8
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:26 pm

Post by bodangles8 »

Barrick is a forward not a D....wow
auggie1989
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:50 am

Post by auggie1989 »

I would say that marshall took it to litchfield in the first two periods, on the score board, but litchfield took it to them in marshalls zone, when litchfield gets there forecheck flowing its really hard to stop... marshall had some good players who could snipe when they had their chances. Not to mention marshalls goalie who stood on his head...... anyone else see the game??
auggie1989
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:50 am

Post by auggie1989 »

HockeytownUSA wrote:literally felt like i watched two different games...the first 2 periods marshall looked great, just was playing good hockey not allowing litch good scoring chances. 3rd period totally different, marshall looked like they just tried to stretch their lead and stop scoring, but litch also came out and showed what kind of fire power they have.
Does Litchfield have any fire Power on their team?
auggie1989
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:50 am

Post by auggie1989 »

what would a all section team of players look like?
Last edited by auggie1989 on Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

auggie1989 wrote:I would say that marshall took it to litchfield in the first two periods, on the score board, but litchfield took it to them in marshalls zone, when litchfield gets there forecheck flowing its really hard to stop... marshall had some good players who could snipe when they had their chances. Not to mention marshalls goalie who stood on his head...... anyone else see the game??
I don't think the score in the first two periods reflected how Litchfield played. Marshall was just making the best of their chances, and their goalie was playing his role.

In my opinion, litch was playing hard the whole game, and marshall just let up a little in the third period which gave Litchfield the opportunities they needed, and once they got momentum it was hard to stop them. They were two pretty even teams, but i think if marshall would have kept it up in the third they would have come out with the win.

Too bad two good periods won't win you a game however, Marshall has to learn to play a solid game from the drop of the puck to the final second
hock$life
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:12 pm

Post by hock$life »

i would say that marshall just scored on there chance and LDC did not.. and i think that Adams on LDC has like eight goals and nine helpers. acording to maxprep. i was at the game it was really good. both teams looked equal.
mnhockey09
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:56 pm

Post by mnhockey09 »

Any predictions on the new ulm-willmar game tomorrow night?
Edger
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:19 am

Post by Edger »

New Ulm coming off 8-1 win over Waseca Thurs nite.
Willmar coming off 7-2 loss to Sauk Tuesday night.
Willmar also plays Wadena on Friday night in Willmar.
New Ulm will be fresher and rested.
NU's strengths are hard work and desire as usual, They are rolling along pretty good right now.
Willmar couldn't sustain the momentum they gained over the holidays and have taken it on the chin lately.
Both teams have some injuries.
Everything points to a big NU win.
But I also believe this could become the #1 rivalry in this new section someday. Similar programs, similar styles, both skate hard and get after you (when they are at the top of their game).
minnhockey33
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by minnhockey33 »

mnhockey09 wrote:Any predictions on the new ulm-willmar game tomorrow night?
I predict it will be a battle
dangleallday16
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:10 pm

Post by dangleallday16 »

mnhockey09 wrote:Any predictions on the new ulm-willmar game tomorrow night?

New Ulm 5
Willmar 2



NU will win the section
justplay22
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:06 pm

Post by justplay22 »

I disagree i think marshall will take the section.
hock$life
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:12 pm

Post by hock$life »

i heard that litch beat mound-westonka in moud today.. mound has beat some pretty good teams i think that score was like 4-2.
Post Reply