You said centennial was on the worse side of it, i simply took that to mean that centennial was being cheapGophyFan18 wrote:I don't recall saying that anywhere. I just thought it was a chippy game.
Blaine vs Centennial 2-15-07
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
6,664th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
What'd I tell ya 'bout Jack Hanna and that Singer kid??
see: Spuds vs Centennial thread or was it "Up for Grabs" ?
S
S
see: Spuds vs Centennial thread or was it "Up for Grabs" ?
S

-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:18 pm
You asked if I was mad Blaine lost. I did think Centennial had a few more cheap shots in there, but both teams had their shots. But putting that behind us, it was a pretty dang good game. Lots of quality scoring chances for both sides.Bash Brother wrote:You said centennial was on the worse side of it, i simply took that to mean that centennial was being cheapGophyFan18 wrote:I don't recall saying that anywhere. I just thought it was a chippy game.
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
hockey talk1 wrote:The centennial fsn streak will continue. Hanna will probably play poorly again and if not he will still let in 4-5 goals. Blaine gets its revenge in a 5-3 home win and another conference championship.
FormerBlaineBengal01 wrote:If the Bengals come out and play a complete game like last night against Elk River they should win this one. They should have won the last meeting at Centennial but some poor goal tending was the biggest reason for that loss. Thursday should be a fun one with the Bengals coming out on top at Fogerty....
THOR wrote:blaine will kill centennial if our goalie plays well. they just don't have the offense to match ours.
BIGSEXY wrote: It's Brent Hollerud and there's no chance Hanna holds the Bengals to 3 goals. Not gonna happen
I don't need to say anything, these boys have said enough...hockey talk1 wrote:The bengals are playing the best hockey they've played all year. They will win 4-3, 4-2. They should've won the first game they played. They had some bad breaks on defense and missed a couple easy goals. They will not lose this one at home.
Thanks boblee!









Swept a few sweeps...
Last edited by Neutron 14 on Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
6,665th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
slapshooter wrote:What'd I tell ya 'bout Jack Hanna and that Singer kid??
see: Spuds vs Centennial thread or was it "Up for Grabs" ?
SS


And just like I said, it's just like I say!slapshooter wrote:It was a great game to watch!
Spent the 3rd period of the JV game chattin' with Jack Hanna and I
think I threw him off just enough to pull the victory!
Nice young man Jack is, and a fine netminder at that!
Got a kick out of Jordan Singers (#12) play too!
The guy's got some play in him as does the rest of Centennials team!
The Spuds did some fine penalty kills throughout, especially when they were down against a 5 on 3 that Centennial failed to take advantage of!
It was a dogfight in the 3rd!
SS
Congratulations Jack!
Nice "zinger" by Singer to beat Blaine too!
Used that Blaine D-Man perfectly for a screen on that one!
L









-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
Hey I just wanted to say that the respect we just earned by beating Blaine 2-1 gives us the real confrence championship as we beat Blaine twice. That is what we did with the respect we got. Oh ya did Hanna hold the Bengals to under three goals i cant remember. Not only did we win on their ice we dominated them in the third period which Singer capped off with another amazing goal. It sure is nice to be able to get out your brooms for the season sweep over a rival.
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
6,666th post by SS sine Feb 27th 2002
Hey Neutron!
Get rid of some of them brooms will ya?
You're messin' up the bandwidth!
S
S
Get rid of some of them brooms will ya?
You're messin' up the bandwidth!
S

-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
BIGSEXY wrote: It's Brent Hollerud and there's no chance Hanna holds the Bengals to 3 goals. Not gonna happen
HAHAHA sorry to see it didn't work out the way you predicted....the bengals were as OVERRATED as I thoughtBIGSEXY wrote:Give me...
Bengals 4
Cougars 2
Beaudette scores 2 along with one from Lynch and Schaber. Singer gets 2 for Centennial but the continued good goaltending for Blaine gets the W.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
I'm sorry but that was the one of the worst officiated games I've seen in a long while. Interesting how Lynch gets penalized for being quicker than the D-Man and "charging" into Hanna. GIVE ME A BREAK! He rode Ben straight into Hanna. The majority of the Bengals offense is generated by the fast breaks and using our speed. Well FSN didn't get to see that because everytime Lynch would beat someone they would hook him and slow him up. EVERY SINGLE TIME! The "refs" finally lost the game when Lynch was hooked straight into Beaudette giving the Cougars an odd-man rush and Singer scored on a very nice shot. That's alright Mr. Cinco, we'll save some seats down at the X for ya in a couple weeks. You guys can bring the ER...I mean the completely original sieve, hand.
Some would call 4 in a row a dynasty
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Easy there Chico, It was another good game for both teams.TheCentennialCinco wrote:So much for that hi powered offense that Centennial couldnt handle. What one goal. Both goalies played well but Blaine's coach gave Centennial the motivation it needed by saying Centennial couldnt man up with Blaine and that Blaine was way more talented.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
Hey your just bitter we beat you on your own ice in Elk River. And the only reason you get to state so much is your sections blows compared to ours. We have four top ten teams in our section its insane. Yes it was a good game but the refs were even for both sides its not like Blaine didnt have there chances on a 3 on 5 power play and some others.
TheCentennialCinco wrote:Hey your just bitter we beat you on your own ice in Elk River. And the only reason you get to state so much is your sections blows compared to ours. We have four top ten teams in our section its insane. Yes it was a good game but the refs were even for both sides its not like Blaine didnt have there chances on a 3 on 5 power play and some others.
You'll still be lucky to make it to the section final. Blaine will make it further in the playoffs then Centennial, no doubt in my mind...
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:18 pm
I was wondering the same thing. He probably knows something we don't, he appears to be very inteligentGophyFan18 wrote:Umm, I don't think that makes any sense. If it does, can you fill me in here?TheCentennialCinco wrote:Hey your just bitter we beat you on your own ice in Elk River.

Some would call 4 in a row a dynasty
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:18 pm
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:50 pm
Did anyone else happen to notice in the third period when the FSN announcers were talking about the sections set up and they mentioned that Centennial had just gotten beaten by Maple Grove about 2 weeks ago, and how they might be some tough competition for Blaine in sections? It is ironic how they failed to mention the 6-0 thrashing Blaine laid on the Leafs after they beat Centennial 3-2 a few days before.... just an observation
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:09 am
-
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
- Location: East Metro
You don't have to be a weatherman to see which way the wind blows. In general I think the officiating has stunk this year. I don't like the way the games are being called now. Takes the flow away and makes it a game of special teams. Let em play!!inthestands wrote:Both teams played a great game.
It's too bad there are always a few that like to place blame on the officials.
Unless you can speak from experience calling a HS game on the ice, your opinions aren't worth much.
Kudos to both teams, and good luck.
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
To whom are you referring here Chico?TheCentennialCinco wrote:Hey your just bitter we beat you on your own ice in Elk River. And the only reason you get to state so much is your sections blows compared to ours. We have four top ten teams in our section its insane. Yes it was a good game but the refs were even for both sides its not like Blaine didnt have there chances on a 3 on 5 power play and some others.

-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:52 am
flash
Anyone else notice right before the game started they showed some of the Blaine fans (mostly girls) and one was flashing her bra? Then the camera went the other way and came back again and she was still flashing.
Interesting
Interesting

-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Re: flash
I'm sure her parents are very proud....Wildhockey99 wrote:Anyone else notice right before the game started they showed some of the Blaine fans (mostly girls) and one was flashing her bra? Then the camera went the other way and came back again and she was still flashing.
Interesting
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm