Section 5a

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

Post by hawkfan70 »

Jacketfan06 wrote:down to three teams in my mind. Denfeld, Cathedral and Hermantown. I hate to say it but for some reason i believe that Hermantown will pull it out in the end. Hopefully im wrong
no love for the Hawks??
hockeyfanatic0011
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:56 pm

Post by hockeyfanatic0011 »

I wouldnt want to see the Hawks go again. I'm gonna be pulling for Denfeld but i wouldn't be upset is Sauk made it to the X this year.
sinbin006
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:53 pm

Post by sinbin006 »

St. Cloud Cathedral - 4 (EN)

Hermantown - 2

Final
1goalwonder wrote:If Cathedral wins:
1. Sauk Rapids
2. Cathedral
3. Denfeld
4. Hermantown
and then the rest
So is this how it shakes out?
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

I don't see it any other way.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
sinbin006
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:53 pm

Post by sinbin006 »

Playoffs should be fun...4 solid teams :o
hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

Post by hawkfan70 »

dam you George Blanda :x
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

hawkfan70 wrote:dam you George Blanda :x
I had nothing to do with tonight's game. Quite frankly, I am surprised at the outcome given the Crusader's current situation.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
fkahckyprofessor20
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:18 pm

Post by fkahckyprofessor20 »

George Blanda wrote:
hawkfan70 wrote:dam you George Blanda :x
I had nothing to do with tonight's game. Quite frankly, I am surprised at the outcome given the Crusader's current situation.[/quote

You can't just leave us hangin GB! What's their current situation?
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

With Schmidt out.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
fkahckyprofessor20
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:18 pm

Post by fkahckyprofessor20 »

Ah, well that just shows there's more to the Crusaders than their top defensemen. Seedings come out Wednesday night, correct?
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

fkahckyprofessor20 wrote:Ah, well that just shows there's more to the Crusaders than their top defensemen. Seedings come out Wednesday night, correct?
They might have been missing three more contributors too, but who's counting?

Tomorrow night they'll come out.

I don't think Sauk Rapids' 3-2 loss at the hands of Sartell will have any impact on seedings, but we'll see.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
sinbin006
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:53 pm

Post by sinbin006 »

I know the Hawks had a few with the flu....no excuses though. All of these teams seem as if they could win on any given night, so it should be interesting :!:
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

sinbin006 wrote:I know the Hawks had a few with the flu....no excuses though. All of these teams seem as if they could win on any given night, so it should be interesting :!:
Exactly right, gotta play with what you've got. I was just surprised that SCC came away with a W given they've fallen on tough times (loss to SR).
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
hockeyfanatic0011
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:56 pm

Post by hockeyfanatic0011 »

After Tuesday nights play im gonna have to think the seeding will be:

SCC
Sauk Rapids
Denfeld
Hermantown.

Anyone agree?
And did SCC and Sauk only play once this year?
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

hockeyfanatic0011 wrote:After Tuesday nights play im gonna have to think the seeding will be:

SCC
Sauk Rapids
Denfeld
Hermantown.

Anyone agree?
And did SCC and Sauk only play once this year?
They only played once. I think SR will get the #1. But I wouldn't be surprised if SCC got the #1 given common opponents...SCC 9-1...SR 6-8.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

George Blanda wrote:
hockeyfanatic0011 wrote:After Tuesday nights play im gonna have to think the seeding will be:

SCC
Sauk Rapids
Denfeld
Hermantown.

Anyone agree?
And did SCC and Sauk only play once this year?
They only played once. I think SR will get the #1. But I wouldn't be surprised if SCC got the #1 given common opponents...SCC 9-1...SR 6-8.
1. Cathedral
2. Sauk Rapids
3. Denfeld
4. Hermantown
5. Mora

Don't know for sure the rest...I think it went like...6. Pine City, 7. Proctor, 8. Princeton 9. North Branch, 10. Moose Lake...only sure on the first 5...unless they're pulling my leg.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
Blue&Gold

Post by Blue&Gold »

George Blanda wrote:
George Blanda wrote:
hockeyfanatic0011 wrote:After Tuesday nights play im gonna have to think the seeding will be:

SCC
Sauk Rapids
Denfeld
Hermantown.

Anyone agree?
And did SCC and Sauk only play once this year?
They only played once. I think SR will get the #1. But I wouldn't be surprised if SCC got the #1 given common opponents...SCC 9-1...SR 6-8.
1. Cathedral
2. Sauk Rapids
3. Denfeld
4. Hermantown
5. Mora

Don't know for sure the rest...I think it went like...6. Pine City, 7. Proctor, 8. Princeton 9. North Branch, 10. Moose Lake...only sure on the first 5...unless they're pulling my leg.
This will be a very good series, assuming that these four make it to the semi-finals. I could see any of these top-4 teams making it to St. Paul.

And George, who would pull your leg? ;-)
Maroon-line-blows
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:45 am

Post by Maroon-line-blows »

The official results go as follows..

#1. Cathedral
#2. Sauk Rapids
#3. Denfeld
#4. Hermantown
#5. Mora
#6. Pine City
#7. Proctor
#8. Princeton
#9. Moose Lake
#10. North Branch
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

That's why I didn't commit to anything. Had a feeling North Branch wasn't anything but the 10 seed.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
1goalwonder
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:22 pm

Post by 1goalwonder »

I almost had them right but i can see why Cathedral is the top seed and like many people including myself have said, i can see any of the top four teams making it to the X. one thing that jumps out at me is Pine City at the 6 spot. The coaches must have done a really good job at selling their team at the meeting considering they lost to North Branch earlier in the year. Also George, when is Schmidt supposed to be back? I would hate for Cathedral to be without a key player come section time.
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

1goalwonder wrote:Also George, when is Schmidt supposed to be back? I would hate for Cathedral to be without a key player come section time.
Call me Bill Belichick when it comes to dishing out that info.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by RLStars »

George Blanda wrote:
1goalwonder wrote:Also George, when is Schmidt supposed to be back? I would hate for Cathedral to be without a key player come section time.
Call me Bill Belichick when it comes to dishing out that info.
Do you pout and leave the game before its over too? :D
George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda »

RLStars wrote:Do you pout and leave the game before its over too? :D
I sprinted out of Sauk Rapids immediately after the Cathedral loss last Saturday, but that was more of a traffic thing.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
Blue&Gold

Post by Blue&Gold »

George Blanda wrote:
RLStars wrote:Do you pout and leave the game before its over too? :D
I sprinted out of Sauk Rapids immediately after the Cathedral loss last Saturday, but that was more of a traffic thing.
George and Bill... hmmmm... Can I see some similarities? hmmmm..

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Actually, George is more outgoing and willing to share his knowledge than Bill.. But George wouldn't be having a video crew tape the opposing coaches to catch signals, although he might look at the parent's videos of their own benches... :shock:
fkahckyprofessor20
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:18 pm

Post by fkahckyprofessor20 »

George Blanda wrote: 1. Cathedral
2. Sauk Rapids
3. Denfeld
4. Hermantown
5. Mora

Don't know for sure the rest...I think it went like...6. Pine City, 7. Proctor, 8. Princeton 9. North Branch, 10. Moose Lake...only sure on the first 5...unless they're pulling my leg.
You about nailed that one right on the head, nice call. Assuming the top 4 will coast into the semis it's going to make for some great matchups. Both games featuring two good teams and maybe a bit of a revenge factor will be involved. I say this because SR and Denfeld would matchup and SR handled Denfeld in the regular season which I'm sure the Hunters haven't forgotten. Then you have SCC and Hermantown. A game still fresh in the mind of both teams that ended in a 4-2 W for SCC on Tuesday night. It's going to be a helluva double header in Cloquet next Thursday, I look forward to being there.
Post Reply