Little Falls Vs. River Lakes Stars

darkdemon · Post by **darkdemon** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:46 am

Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.

74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:28 am

darkdemon wrote:
Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.
74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.

I would say that needing 5 goals to beat River Lakes and giving up 4 goals on 29 shots against them isn't playing your best game.

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:47 am

darkdemon wrote:
Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.
74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.

74 shots and they played like crap nice one mite-dad. aren't you the one that said you don't know anything about hockey even though you had all them posts. maybe RL stars goalie had the game of his life.

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:13 am

ap4mvp wrote:
darkdemon wrote:
Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.
74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.
74 shots and they played like crap nice one mite-dad. aren't you the one that said you don't know anything about hockey even though you had all them posts. maybe RL stars goalie had the game of his life.

He probably did have the game of his life but that doesn't change the fact that no team gearing up for a run at state should ever give up 4 goals to River Lakes.

EDIT
Unless they're in 3A

sticks · Post by **sticks** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:15 am

Still, the point is that it was a game, when it shouldn't have been. Allowing 4 to RL is not a good sign. It's unacceptable. I hope they haven't flipped the switch to coast.

Cooch better make that very clear.

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:16 am

Goldy Gopher wrote:
ap4mvp wrote:
darkdemon wrote: 74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.
74 shots and they played like crap nice one mite-dad. aren't you the one that said you don't know anything about hockey even though you had all them posts. maybe RL stars goalie had the game of his life.
He probably did have the game of his life but that doesn't change the fact that no team gearing up for a run at state should ever give up 4 goals to River Lakes.

EDIT
Unless they're in 3A

good point

but really the score with 74 shots could have been a lot higher

your right with 3A that section is garbage this year

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:19 am

ap4mvp wrote:
Goldy Gopher wrote:
ap4mvp wrote: 74 shots and they played like crap nice one mite-dad. aren't you the one that said you don't know anything about hockey even though you had all them posts. maybe RL stars goalie had the game of his life.
He probably did have the game of his life but that doesn't change the fact that no team gearing up for a run at state should ever give up 4 goals to River Lakes.

EDIT
Unless they're in 3A
good point but really the score with 74 shots could have been a lot higher

your right with 3A that section is garbage this year

You don't get it. I'm not knocking their offensive performance. Putting up 74 shots is impressive, no matter who you're playing. It's the defensive performance, or lack there of, that I am very surprised by.

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:27 am

Goldy Gopher wrote:
ap4mvp wrote:
Goldy Gopher wrote: He probably did have the game of his life but that doesn't change the fact that no team gearing up for a run at state should ever give up 4 goals to River Lakes.

EDIT
Unless they're in 3A
good point but really the score with 74 shots could have been a lot higher

your right with 3A that section is garbage this year
You don't get it. I'm not knocking their offensive performance. Putting up 74 shots is impressive, no matter who you're playing. It's the defensive performance, or lack there of, that I am very surprised by.

no you don't get it

I didn't say anything about the defensive performance yeah I'm dissapointed in 4 goals let up by lf, but with 74 shots by lf on rl they should have put the puck in the net more

George Blanda · Post by **George Blanda** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:40 am

Goldy Gopher wrote:You don't get it. I'm not knocking their offensive performance. Putting up 74 shots is impressive, no matter who you're playing. It's the defensive performance, or lack there of, that I am very surprised by.

You're surprised by the lack of defensive play by the Flyers? I think that's become commonplace.

George Blanda · Post by **George Blanda** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:45 am

This was only the third time this year that River Lakes has put up at least three goals in a game. The other times were against Becker and Prairie Centre...

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:01 pm

George Blanda wrote:This was only the third time this year that River Lakes has put up at least three goals in a game. The other times were against Becker and Prairie Centre...

Both state tourney caliber teams...

GopherPuckPlayer · Post by **GopherPuckPlayer** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:43 pm

shins wrote:Was it true that Little Falls had 75 shots on goal!!!! WOW

75-20

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:28 pm

GopherPuckPlayer wrote:
shins wrote:Was it true that Little Falls had 75 shots on goal!!!! WOW
75-20

Just wait until truckman gets on here and tells us LF had only 30 shots on goal and that the coaches cooked the books again and made it into 75

Give him a couple hours he'll say something to that caliber

Mite-dad · Post by **Mite-dad** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:38 pm

ap4mvp wrote:
darkdemon wrote:
Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.
74 shots on goal and they are playing like crap ok Mitey-dude maybe the defense needs to tighten up.
74 shots and they played like crap nice one mite-dad. aren't you the one that said you don't know anything about hockey even though you had all them posts. maybe RL stars goalie had the game of his life.

Exactly what I said, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that giving up 4 goals to the worst team in AA, possibly the state, is playing like crap. I also don't think they played well against SRR where a break here or there could have sent them down again. The first 3 LF goals in the SRR game could have been stopped I thought and then the outcome could have been much different. And if you think they were clicking against Willmar, I think you are smoking something.

flameofshame69 · Post by **flameofshame69** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:41 pm

Look .... its a mite guy in a high school forum ....... should you be in the mighty mite forum ............ cause your comments are not needed in this forum ........ get a job maybe as a rocket scientist and stop making your wife carry the family income

sticks · Post by **sticks** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:56 pm

FOS, You're not bringing anything to the table.

Mite-dad is right.

If this team wants to do ANYTHING at state, they need to shore things up on the defensive end. They can't expect to put the puck in the net 6-7 times a game against top-notch teams.

jman · Post by **jman** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:59 pm

Mite-dad wrote:I told you they've been playing like crap since Ben came back. They'll squeak by Wadena and lose to both FF and Alex if they keep playing like this. They need a wake-up call. Hopefully last night was one, but they may take another loss of two for their wake-up call.

Playing like crap and geting 74 shots "Ben" was shut the hell down

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:14 pm

Mite-dad wrote:Exactly what I said, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that giving up 4 goals to the worst team in AA, possibly the state, is playing like crap. I also don't think they played well against SRR where a break here or there could have sent them down again. The first 3 LF goals in the SRR game could have been stopped I thought and then the outcome could have been much different. And if you think they were clicking against Willmar, I think you are smoking something.

Bad, YES...............Worst, NO

They spanked Becker/Big Lake 7-2

Mite-dad · Post by **Mite-dad** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:38 pm

Hey, I'm sorry I ruffled some of you folks' feathers, but you have to admit, they aren't playing their best hockey right now. I've watched them play a lot of games this year and last, and they've played a lot better. They were playing well on both ends for several games through the last Sartell game, and lately they haven't been on their "A" game. Again, sorry if I ticked some of you guys off.

darkdemon · Post by **darkdemon** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:01 pm

Ooo. look at the mite dud saying hes sorry what a guy if only he'd share his saurkraut at the game

Bauer 3000 · Post by **Bauer 3000** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:24 am

Mite-dad wrote:Hey, I'm sorry I ruffled some of you folks' feathers, but you have to admit, they aren't playing their best hockey right now. I've watched them play a lot of games this year and last, and they've played a lot better. They were playing well on both ends for several games through the last Sartell game, and lately they haven't been on their "A" game. Again, sorry if I ticked some of you guys off.

Don't worry Mite-Dad, that Flame guy is an idiot

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:14 pm

for a newby flamofshame69 you hold nothing back. How about you settle down a bit