We got any confirmation on this?bemused wrote:Heard the pioneers will be down a few players due to disciplinary reasons?WestMetro wrote:Coin flip, and Lechner gets the edge. He is worth a couple goals in big games.
Saint Thomas vs Hill Murray.
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:53 am
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:32 pm
I guess that's one way to look at it but Lechner has proved in the past that it doesn't matter what line you are on or what you role is on the team, if you break the rules you're done. Can't say I've seen the same at STA. How is Vannelli's record vs. HM? On the HM hockey website it is showing that today's game is the 28th meeting between these 2 schools since 2001. I don't know how long each coach as been at their respective school but in that timeframe I know STA was racking up JV trophies before moving up to the big show last year and they have only managed SIX wins vs. HM since 2001. How does that make him a better coach? Just curious as to what your reasoning is behind stating that Vannelli is the better coach.bauerman wrote:I have a loy of respect for Hill Murray and I lot of respect for Lechner but i spoke of this last year ,there is no way Lechner is a better coach than Tom Vannelli. His taems are always disciplined and very very well coached and he doesnt get the props that he deserves
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
It is worth noting that St Thomas was 3-24 the year before the Vannellis took over and had won a total of 10 games in previous 3 years. Lechner, on the other hand, took over a program that had their last losing season in 1966. It's hard to compare who's a "better coach" simply based on their head to head records without taking that into account.kpryan88 wrote:I guess that's one way to look at it but Lechner has proved in the past that it doesn't matter what line you are on or what you role is on the team, if you break the rules you're done. Can't say I've seen the same at STA. How is Vannelli's record vs. HM? On the HM hockey website it is showing that today's game is the 28th meeting between these 2 schools since 2001. I don't know how long each coach as been at their respective school but in that timeframe I know STA was racking up JV trophies before moving up to the big show last year and they have only managed SIX wins vs. HM since 2001. How does that make him a better coach? Just curious as to what your reasoning is behind stating that Vannelli is the better coach.bauerman wrote:I have a loy of respect for Hill Murray and I lot of respect for Lechner but i spoke of this last year ,there is no way Lechner is a better coach than Tom Vannelli. His taems are always disciplined and very very well coached and he doesnt get the props that he deserves
I have always been impressed by the discipline of Vannellis' players on the bench and ice and have specifically been unimpressed with Lechner's players for the same reasons. I, however, cannot comment on anything else comparatively between the two.
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
My sample size is admittedly quite small. I have seen very few games where they weren't playing against St Thomas, which likely matters understandably.stpaul wrote:Nonsense.HShockeywatcher wrote:I have always been impressed by the discipline of Vannellis' players on the bench and ice and have specifically been unimpressed with Lechner's players for the same reasons.
Teams and players take on the personality of their coach. Bill Lechner is always calm and cool. His teams play tough and disciplined hockey. Greg Vannelli is a yeller. He is constantly barking at officials. As a result his players are always looking for the penalty and waiving their arms when they don't get it.thestickler07 wrote:Elaborate.
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
Interesting take.stpaul wrote:Teams and players take on the personality of their coach. Bill Lechner is always calm and cool. His teams play tough and disciplined hockey. Greg Vannelli is a yeller. He is constantly barking at officials. As a result his players are always looking for the penalty and waiving their arms when they don't get it.thestickler07 wrote:Elaborate.
How are the boys on Randolph doing this year? I haven't caught a Raider game yet.
Good team. 7-0-2 in their last 9. I was at the WBL game last week. WBL had the edge until CDH took it to them in the 3rd outshooting them 13-6 and scoring 2. Its a relatively weak section and they have as good a chance as any to win it.thestickler07 wrote:How are the boys on Randolph doing this year? I haven't caught a Raider game yet.
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
Good to hear.stpaul wrote:Good team. 7-0-2 in their last 9. I was at the WBL game last week. WBL had the edge until CDH took it to them in the 3rd outshooting them 13-6 and scoring 2. Its a relatively weak section and they have as good a chance as any to win it.thestickler07 wrote:How are the boys on Randolph doing this year? I haven't caught a Raider game yet.
Would be a fanatic atmosphere if the Raiders and Cadets made the section final.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:14 pm
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
Another fun Hockey Day game. The Pioneers did a good job of imposing their physical style through much of the game, but STA won the special teams battle, and their finishers don't need much.
I said this a few times last year before STA lost to Eagan, and the same thing looks to be true this season: they don't seem to have a whole lot of answers for tough, deep, physical teams. This wasn't something they ever had to face in Class A, and it takes some adjustments to beat this sort of team with any consistency. They got a bit more physical as the game went on, and that helped some. But until they add a few more wrinkles, I'm going to be a bit skeptical of their ability to beat teams like Hill, Edina, and Wayzata. They have the talent, but I have yet to see the scheme.
I said this a few times last year before STA lost to Eagan, and the same thing looks to be true this season: they don't seem to have a whole lot of answers for tough, deep, physical teams. This wasn't something they ever had to face in Class A, and it takes some adjustments to beat this sort of team with any consistency. They got a bit more physical as the game went on, and that helped some. But until they add a few more wrinkles, I'm going to be a bit skeptical of their ability to beat teams like Hill, Edina, and Wayzata. They have the talent, but I have yet to see the scheme.
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm
I just can't draw conclusions like that from a game played outdoors. Ever since HDM has come out and the games were played outside the more offensive team has been the one that has been put at a disadvantage. In '08 Blaine played Roseau a lot closer than they would have on indoor ice, they only lost 1-0. A few years later Hermantown only lost 1-0 to Eden Prairie I believe. I agree STA had stretches of the game where they didn't look very good, but I can't believe that would necessarily carry over to a game played in normal conditions.karl(east) wrote:Another fun Hockey Day game. The Pioneers did a good job of imposing their physical style through much of the game, but STA won the special teams battle, and their finishers don't need much.
I said this a few times last year before STA lost to Eagan, and the same thing looks to be true this season: they don't seem to have a whole lot of answers for tough, deep, physical teams. This wasn't something they ever had to face in Class A, and it takes some adjustments to beat this sort of team with any consistency. They got a bit more physical as the game went on, and that helped some. But until they add a few more wrinkles, I'm going to be a bit skeptical of their ability to beat teams like Hill, Edina, and Wayzata. They have the talent, but I have yet to see the scheme.