And I vote for Gopher Blog for "most angry/condescending poster" I also nominate him for "Most biased/unrealistic defender of his favorite squad"Gopher Blog wrote:1) You don't own this board and there is more than one thread on Mr. Hockey here. You gonna whine about multiple posts on that topic too?green4 wrote:1) This is a thread on Mr. Hockey, so lets get it back on track, and celebrate Jake and his accomplishment.Gopher Blog wrote: Hmm... I think we'll take our chances on that one. Especially considering Ahcan makes Aaron Ness look like the size of Erik Johnson.
2) The Gophers stink, they have too much talent each year to be this trashy. I won't follow them until Lucia is gone.
3) The gophers currently have Cammarata on their team and he makes my 5 year old cousin look big.
4) I would rather have Ahcan at this moment then Sadek
2) Three straight conference titles and a couple frozen four appearances in recent years doesn't exactly stink. This year... they have underachieved given their talent. I don't disagree.
3) Cammy is a forward. Not a D like the other guys being discussed. Try following along.
4) That's fine. Everybody is entitled to an opinion... and considering they aren't playing college "at this moment" (and its about projection a few years from now too), we'll have to revisit it. I'll think they are pretty satisfied with who they decided on.
Mr. Hockey
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
As mentioned, some of the Mr. Hockey nominees will get some playing time at the end of this USHL season. Here's where you may or may not see some of them this weekend...
• Nick & Jack Poehling - Green Bay
• Will Borgen* - Omaha
• Dylan Malmquist - Lincoln
• Jake Jaremko* - Chicago
• Dixon Bowen* - Fargo
• Jack Ahcan - Cedar Rapids
• Jack Sadek - Omaha
• Peter Tufto - Green Bay
• Christiano Versich - Chicago
*Already played some USHL games.
I'm not sure what the rules are regarding playoffs, but I believe all of these guys are eligible for regular season games because they are affiliated players.
• Nick & Jack Poehling - Green Bay
• Will Borgen* - Omaha
• Dylan Malmquist - Lincoln
• Jake Jaremko* - Chicago
• Dixon Bowen* - Fargo
• Jack Ahcan - Cedar Rapids
• Jack Sadek - Omaha
• Peter Tufto - Green Bay
• Christiano Versich - Chicago
*Already played some USHL games.
I'm not sure what the rules are regarding playoffs, but I believe all of these guys are eligible for regular season games because they are affiliated players.
Does anybody else see the irony here? Pot meet Kettle..Sats81 wrote:And I vote for Gopher Blog for "most angry/condescending poster" I also nominate him for "Most biased/unrealistic defender of his favorite squad"Gopher Blog wrote:1) You don't own this board and there is more than one thread on Mr. Hockey here. You gonna whine about multiple posts on that topic too?green4 wrote: 1) This is a thread on Mr. Hockey, so lets get it back on track, and celebrate Jake and his accomplishment.
2) The Gophers stink, they have too much talent each year to be this trashy. I won't follow them until Lucia is gone.
3) The gophers currently have Cammarata on their team and he makes my 5 year old cousin look big.
4) I would rather have Ahcan at this moment then Sadek
2) Three straight conference titles and a couple frozen four appearances in recent years doesn't exactly stink. This year... they have underachieved given their talent. I don't disagree.
3) Cammy is a forward. Not a D like the other guys being discussed. Try following along.
4) That's fine. Everybody is entitled to an opinion... and considering they aren't playing college "at this moment" (and its about projection a few years from now too), we'll have to revisit it. I'll think they are pretty satisfied with who they decided on.
It's not called Biased/unrealistic when a team is 57-5-1 with a state title and a runner up over the course of the last 2 years. Ps: weren't you the main one challenging me about 14-15 months ago on this team and the number of D1 players I had projected? Thought so.bemused wrote:Does anybody else see the irony here? Pot meet Kettle..Sats81 wrote:And I vote for Gopher Blog for "most angry/condescending poster" I also nominate him for "Most biased/unrealistic defender of his favorite squad"Gopher Blog wrote: 1) You don't own this board and there is more than one thread on Mr. Hockey here. You gonna whine about multiple posts on that topic too?
2) Three straight conference titles and a couple frozen four appearances in recent years doesn't exactly stink. This year... they have underachieved given their talent. I don't disagree.
3) Cammy is a forward. Not a D like the other guys being discussed. Try following along.
4) That's fine. Everybody is entitled to an opinion... and considering they aren't playing college "at this moment" (and its about projection a few years from now too), we'll have to revisit it. I'll think they are pretty satisfied with who they decided on.
Perfect!!Sats81 wrote:It's not called Biased/unrealistic when a team is 57-5-1 with a state title and a runner up over the course of the last 2 years. Ps: weren't you the main one challenging me about 14-15 months ago on this team and the number of D1 players I had projected? Thought so.bemused wrote:Does anybody else see the irony here? Pot meet Kettle..Sats81 wrote: And I vote for Gopher Blog for "most angry/condescending poster" I also nominate him for "Most biased/unrealistic defender of his favorite squad"
I don't think he recognized that you were calling him angry and condescending. Or, maybe he was trying to prove you right. We'll never know.bemused wrote:Perfect!!Sats81 wrote:It's not called Biased/unrealistic when a team is 57-5-1 with a state title and a runner up over the course of the last 2 years. Ps: weren't you the main one challenging me about 14-15 months ago on this team and the number of D1 players I had projected? Thought so.bemused wrote: Does anybody else see the irony here? Pot meet Kettle..
and i'll just refrain from saying anything at all to you Traxler....anything anyone would want to know about you could simply be found in the cloquet/STMA thread.Traxler wrote:I don't think he recognized that you were calling him angry and condescending. Or, maybe he was trying to prove you right. We'll never know.bemused wrote:Perfect!!Sats81 wrote: It's not called Biased/unrealistic when a team is 57-5-1 with a state title and a runner up over the course of the last 2 years. Ps: weren't you the main one challenging me about 14-15 months ago on this team and the number of D1 players I had projected? Thought so.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
LOLbemused wrote:Perfect!!Sats81 wrote:It's not called Biased/unrealistic when a team is 57-5-1 with a state title and a runner up over the course of the last 2 years. Ps: weren't you the main one challenging me about 14-15 months ago on this team and the number of D1 players I had projected? Thought so.bemused wrote: Does anybody else see the irony here? Pot meet Kettle..
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
Gopher Blog wrote:2) Three straight conference titles and a couple frozen four appearances in recent years doesn't exactly stink. This year... they have underachieved given their talent. I don't disagree.
Might want to check the prescription on those reading glasses."Most biased/unrealistic defender of his favorite squad"
