Stillwater @ Holy Angels 1-11-07

hast-h-fan · Post by **hast-h-fan** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:23 am

Kinda embarrassing...isn't it?

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:10 pm

It is only embarassing if you feel that you were better before the game. I am sure that all of us that posted a score on this topipc are kind of embarassed because of the outcome. I was in the arena and do not feel that AHA felt embarassed.... I saw some of them after the game, not a problem. I saw Stillwater, they were not gloating. That game was a hard fought tie by both teams...
I would guess, say again guess, Stillwater feels they stole one from AHA as they should. They were able to stay with AHA, and no one else this year can say that except Wayzata was close, that they skated completely with AHA. They TIED.

These kids are all good kids. Embarassed? come on now.

Go back and look at my first post at the beginning and you will see my true feelings about how this game was going to be played. My second one was not my true feelings but more a response to someones post. Then look at my post about the game.

HOFamer · Post by **HOFamer** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:04 pm

HOFamer wrote:This sets up to be a solid game with offense versus defense...I take the defense.

CNT/stars612 you really should start listening to me....

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:07 pm

Boy you know I can't win... I post something about AHA playing down against Wazyata and someone posts that I cannot admit that someone could play well against AHA. Then I post an honest opinion about a school that does play AHA real well and someone comes on here and still posts something against them and go back and say they swipe players..... I guess there are too many whiners out there and you cannot please anyone.....

But I knew that.... I am now embarassed!!!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:13 pm

Everyone gets up to play AHA. And its impossible to bring your A game every night. AHA got caught looking ahead. Simple as that.

Keep posting it as you see it Zamman.

Post by **east hockey** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:13 pm

Zamman wrote:Boy you know I can't win... I post something about AHA playing down against Wazyata and someone posts that I cannot admit that someone could play well against AHA. Then I post an honest opinion about a school that does play AHA real well and someone comes on here and still posts something against them and go back and say they swipe players..... I guess there are too many whiners out there and you cannot please anyone.....

But I knew that.... I am now embarassed!!!

Zam, I took care of the one post you refer to. It had no place in this thread.

Lee

HOFamer · Post by **HOFamer** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:27 pm

well let's see...Phil Housley played defense in the NHL for how many years? You think he might know a little something about it...maybe even enough to stop a bunch of high school kids. Stillwater hits...don't they boys..they also beat Fargo South earlier...

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:40 pm

Thanks Lee!!

Good point about Housley.....

hast-h-fan · Post by **hast-h-fan** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:10 pm

Boy everyone hammers Stillwater with all there predictions and they come up big. It did belong in the thread, some people just get a bit sensitive though. Sorry if hurt anyones feelings speaking the truth.

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:14 pm

hey shamman there is only one p in topic try using spelwrite
APPEL VALLY APPEL VALLY
SAY HI TO MISSCONNIEPREP
there is one word i do know how to spell OVERRATED[/quote]

stars612 · Post by **stars612** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:20 pm

HOFamer wrote:
HOFamer wrote:This sets up to be a solid game with offense versus defense...I take the defense.
CNT/stars612 you really should start listening to me....

HOFamer... On the contrary, you should really start listening to
me... or learn how to read if that is the problem here. For easy reference I will repost my prediction which was just a few short posts before yours.

Stars612 wrote:

When teams get too confident, they lose. Gophers vs. Holy Cross... nuff said.

Anyways, yes the Wayzata night was an off night for the Stars, and yes it would probably be a much more dominating performance the second time around, but you said it Zam. They ran into a hot goaltender, and that can happen on any night of the week. Don't sign Stillwater's death certificate yet guys.

That said I'll go with the usual...
5-3 Stars

[/i]

Zeke16 · Post by **Zeke16** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:22 pm

Kickinwing should get an a@@kickin. That likely was from typing too fast not from inability to spell. I think overrated for AHA quite far from the truth. I guess to be blunt, you sound retarrtedd

stars612 · Post by **stars612** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:25 pm

kickinwing wrote:hey shamman there is only one p in topic try using spelwrite
APPEL VALLY APPEL VALLY
SAY HI TO MISSCONNIEPREP
there is one word i do know how to spell OVERRATED

[/quote]

Hey smart one, there is an E in VALLEY. Try using YOUR BRAIN, if you have one... I am uncertain at the moment.

There is one word I know how to spell as well.

CHASKA.

Or I can put some stats up.

Edina + Lose= 1

AHA + Lose=0

Also try looking at Stillwater's schedule... they play a tough schedule, and have been fairly successful so far. They are by no means a bad team.

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:29 pm

Hey I was called a name, I am now going to run and cry....

Now read this and let it go...

Fantastic game, I say again. Stillwater played AHA's game and did everything they needed to do to take AHA out of the game. Strong goaltending, good defense and a nice forecheck. My hats off to them in a great gameplan and execution.

One blemish would be in the first period, AHA had a goal waved off. The faithfull from Stillwater were right there and all grabbed their heads in disgust when the puck went in and were jumping for joy when the refs waved it off.

Fun game....

just so you know I wrote this.
And I do not know of anyone who uses spell checker for every post....

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:40 pm

Hey Shamman your false humility is rediculously transparent

Blue Breeze · Post by **Blue Breeze** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:47 pm

kickinwing wrote:Hey Shamman your false humility is rediculously transparent

If you're going to criticize other people's spelling, don't misspell words yourself.

stars612 · Post by **stars612** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:54 pm

kickinwing wrote:Hey Shamman your false humility is rediculously transparent

False humility? Sure whatever you say... anyway from The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language, the word you referred to before transparent is actually spelled Ridiculously .

Main Entry: ri·dic·u·lous
Pronunciation: r&-'di-ky&-l&s
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin ridiculosus (from ridiculum jest, from neuter of ridiculus) or ridiculus, literally, laughable, from ridEre to laugh
: arousing or deserving ridicule : ABSURD, PREPOSTEROUS
synonym see LAUGHABLE
- ri·dic·u·lous·ly adverb
- ri·dic·u·lous·ness noun.

Keep trying though... maybe if you ask your parents they'll get you hooked on phonics next Christmas.

SEC Scotty · Post by **SEC Scotty** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:57 pm

What did you west metro guys think of Tyler Kieffers game?

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:32 pm

I hate to state the obvious , but what is it youguys don't underswtand about sarcasm

stars612 · Post by **stars612** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:38 pm

kickinwing wrote:I hate to state the obvious , but what is it youguys don't underswtand about sarcasm

That wasn't a statement it was a question.

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:53 pm

It was a questment. I hope you understand.
kickinwing says:

I only sell the good stuf.

and I'm thinkin' bout changin' my name

any idea's ??????????.............

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:27 pm

Zamman wrote:
They did only beat Wayzata 2-1
I cannot believe that someone that has been around as much as boblee has would make a statement like this....
AHA played back to back games and still had 40 shots on goal. They played against a real tough goalie who was on fire that night.
AHA plays Wayzata again the score is much worse, then what. Wayzata was off that night. Sorry.... AHA will be riding the ponies all around the rink..
7 - 1...

See Zam, I wasn't THAT crazy when I said it.

HOFamer · Post by **HOFamer** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:42 pm

stars612 wrote:
HOFamer wrote:
HOFamer wrote:This sets up to be a solid game with offense versus defense...I take the defense.
CNT/stars612 you really should start listening to me....
HOFamer... On the contrary, you should really start listening to
me... or learn how to read if that is the problem here. For easy reference I will repost my prediction which was just a few short posts before yours.

Stars612 wrote:
When teams get too confident, they lose. Gophers vs. Holy Cross... nuff said.

Anyways, yes the Wayzata night was an off night for the Stars, and yes it would probably be a much more dominating performance the second time around, but you said it Zam. They ran into a hot goaltender, and that can happen on any night of the week. Don't sign Stillwater's death certificate yet guys.

That said I'll go with the usual...
5-3 Stars
[/i]

Stars you predicted a two goal win??? Don't see how I should be learning from that? Of course someone as arrogant as yourself probably knows...to say your statement makes no sense is an understatement..

Zeke16 · Post by **Zeke16** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:22 pm

Oh I get it now! Kickhimself is a CAKE EATER!! No wonder he has made so many derrogatory comments, he is better than everyone else.
Just when you can almost like Edina, of course, I said almost.

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:09 pm

I'd rather be eatin' cake than eatin' pony poop

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Stillwater @ Holy Angels 1-11-07

Who wins?