TRF vs. PR 1-25-07

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

trf vs. pr on 12-25-07

Poll ended at Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:01 pm

trf
19
63%
pr
11
37%
 
Total votes: 30

MNHockey75
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Bemidji, MN

Post by MNHockey75 »

3-1 after one, TRF
MNHockey75
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Bemidji, MN

Post by MNHockey75 »

1st Period:

0-1 - TRF - Lucas Dillon 1 (Unassisted) 4:52 - SHG
0-2 - TRF - Michael Benedict 7 (Corey Horien) 8:05
0-3 - TRF - Corey Horien 12 (Kent Peterson, Aaron Langen) 10:22
1-3 - PR - Curtis Tolle 8 (Zach Lehrke) 12:53

Saves - Mark Smith 8, Cole Hunt 2
Shots - PR: 3, TRF: 11
PP - PR: 0/1, TRF: 0/0
MNHockey75
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Bemidji, MN

Update: Panthers at Prowlers

Post by MNHockey75 »

2nd Period:

1-4 - TRF - Corey Horien 13 (Matt Olson, John Carlson) 1:09 - PPG

Saves - Mark Smith 15, Cole Hunt 6
Shots - PR: 7, TRF: 19
PP - PR: 0/3, TRF: 1/2
MNHockey75
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Bemidji, MN

FINAL - Thief River Falls 4, Park Rapids 1

Post by MNHockey75 »

FINAL - Thief River Falls 4, Park Rapids 1

1st Period
Thief River Falls 4:52, Lucas Dillon 1 (shorthanded) (unassisted)
Thief River Falls 8:05, Michael Benedict 7 (Corey Horien)
Thief River Falls 10:22, Corey Horien 12 (Kent Peterson, Aaron Langen)
Park Rapids 12:53, Curtis Tolle 8 (Zach Lehrke)

2nd Period
Thief River Falls 1:09, Corey Horien 13 (powerplay) (Matt Olson, John Carlson)

3rd Period
None

Shots on Goal
Park Rapids 3-4-2--9
Thief River Falls 11-8-9--28

Power Plays
Park Rapids 0/5
Thief River Falls 1/4

Goalies
Mark Smith, Park Rapids - 24 Saves
Cole Hunt, Thief River Falls - 8 Saves
Irishmans Shanty
Posts: 3988
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by Irishmans Shanty »

Great work on the Updates!

TR wins but Park covers, Vegas line was TR -3.5.
mnwild18
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:54 pm

Post by mnwild18 »

Park Rapids needs to pick it up if they can only generate nine shots on net. Was that Park's first section loss though?
Wild4hockey
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Delano, MN

Post by Wild4hockey »

mnwild18 wrote:Park Rapids needs to pick it up if they can only generate nine shots on net. Was that Park's first section loss though?
It was their first section loss, the way I see it they are battling for the 5th seed. They probably can't do any better than that.
mnwild18
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:54 pm

Post by mnwild18 »

I think the seedings will be something along the lines of...
1. Warroad
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Detroit Lakes
5. Park Rapids
6. Crookston
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
minnhockey
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by minnhockey »

What a sloppy game for PR...TRF made some nice shots...no one really stood out that game...PR was not playing good and TRF just didnt look like they could....the only player i saw on the roster that stood out was Park's freshman Defense McMorrow....hes a pretty good player and at 6'1
Warrior18
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:13 pm

Post by Warrior18 »

That is impressive. TRF only allowed 9 shots. Good win for TRF.
schwang17
Posts: 1225
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:56 pm

Post by schwang17 »

minnhockey wrote:the only player i saw on the roster that stood out was Park's freshman Defense McMorrow....hes a pretty good player and at 6'1
Completely agree, he has a bright future if he works hard the next couple years. Very good kid also. His dad was my high school coach.
SB24
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:36 pm

Post by SB24 »

He did look good especially for a 9th grader. He was the only D on the ice who was even trying to make a pass. The rest off the team was just flipping it all over the place.

Should prob move to a school that knows how to play hockey. Most off the players on that team don’t look like they have ever been coached in there lives
RIP suzy 12.10.2006 - 2.27.2008
the mullet
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:47 pm

Post by the mullet »

mnwild18 wrote:Park Rapids needs to pick it up if they can only generate nine shots on net. Was that Park's first section loss though?

I think there was a little home cookin on the scoreboard shots, but it wasn't too far off. PR couldn't generate anything offensivly. Lehrke was almost non-exsistant, TRF had Benedict on the ice every time Lerhrke was. Not the same game i have seen from Lehrke two times earlier this year.

TRF just played very solid, dumped, chased, controlled play, Smith from PR let in a couple weak ones, and PR's forwards looked slow and sluggish all night. 18 and 20 played real well for Park, Horien had a good game, and 1st d-pair for TRF shut Lehrke and his line down.
Post Reply