Will Park Rapids lose before sections?

mohunk · Post by **mohunk** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:17 pm

SB24 wrote:like i said, not a chance.

Excuse me!!! You beat TRF on your huge ice (quite an advantage) by only 3 back when everyone was saying how TRF was such a young team and needed to develop. Then, quess what, only beat them by one (and would have lost if Bryce would not have been on the ice) as TRF has developed. 3 goal differential and 1 goal differential are not greater than the 4 goal differential PR beat them by tonight. And that was without PR's sophomore stud (US National Development Select 15 member) who--guess again--will be back in time for Sections, plus Lehrke sat the last 4 minutes. And Sections are not on your turf this year (lose the huge ice advantage). I'd say PR has a legitamate claim for the number one seed, but if they don't get it, so what. They are going to state anyway after they roll over you.

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:20 pm

mohunk wrote:
SB24 wrote:like i said, not a chance.
Excuse me!!! You beat TRF on your huge ice (quite an advantage) by only 3 back when everyone was saying how TRF was such a young team and needed to develop. Then, quess what, only beat them by one (and would have lost if Bryce would not have been on the ice) as TRF has developed. 3 goal differential and 1 goal differential are not greater than the 4 goal differential PR beat them by tonight. And that was without PR's sophomore stud (US National Development Select 15 member) who--guess again--will be back in time for Sections, plus Lehrke sat the last 4 minutes. And Sections are not on your turf this year (lose the huge ice advantage). I'd say PR has a legitamate claim for the number one seed, but if they don't get it, so what. They are going to state anyway after they roll over you.

POST OF THE YEAR

I don't even know where to start on that one....have a few brews tonight did ya?

sinbombyzermancurve · Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:25 pm

i feel warroad will get the one seed. But, i think that is fine for pr but for pr's sake, i would be hoping trf gets the 3 seed and then egf gets the 4. Even though it in in trf, i think pr matches up better against thief than they do against egf.

warroad will get the one seed reguardless of how they finish..and thats fine

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:54 pm

sinbombyzermancurve wrote: i think pr matches up better against thief than they do against egf.

Finally some real analysis. Matchups are hard to explain but they are a very real thing in athletics. I concur, PR obviously matches up very well with TRF and based on one game, PR matches up very differently with EGF. Yet TRF handled EGF when they played.

I've seen the following or variations of it playout between EGF, TRF, and Crox before and it doesn't make sense.

Crox > EGF
EGF > TRF
TRF > Crox

How does Warroad matchup with PR? I'm going to continue to enjoy reading about it, but until they meet on the ice, I won't know for sure.

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:10 am

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:i feel warroad will get the one seed. But, i think that is fine for pr but for pr's sake, i would be hoping trf gets the 3 seed and then egf gets the 4. Even though it in in trf, i think pr matches up better against thief than they do against egf.

warroad will get the one seed reguardless of how they finish..and thats fine

Of course there are a lot of important games left, but after tonight...
1 Warroad
2 PR
3 EGF
4 Bemidji
5 TRF
6 Crookston
7 LOW
8 Hallock
9 RLF
10 11 Walker & Bagley

Stiff-Shaft · Post by **Stiff-Shaft** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:12 am

Where do you think PS2 will put PR after tonight?

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:17 am

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:24 am

elliott70 wrote:
Of course there are a lot of important games left, but after tonight...
1 Warroad
2 PR
3 EGF
4 Bemidji
5 TRF
6 Crookston
7 LOW
8 Hallock
9 RLF
10 11 Walker & Bagley

The coaches of teams #7-11: at least 4 out of 5 will give PR the #2

The coach of #6: still has to play them

The coach of #5: would need to be convinced that PR is better than EGF, tonight went a long ways towards that

The coach of #4: elliott can enlighten us

The coach of #3: likes his own team more, but he can't vote for himself

The coach of #2: likes his own team more, but he can't vote for himself

The coach of #1: I won't even speculate

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:10 am

hahahaha..Muhunk you are the man....anyways this is killing me...im laughing so hard right now...I need to sleep!!

GO PR...UNDEFEATED!!!!!!!

19-0-0.....cont.

Lakeviewing · Post by **Lakeviewing** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:00 am

Who really cares. Play somebody important

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:40 am

Lakeviewing wrote:Who really cares. Play somebody important

GO home lakeviewing...ur remind me of ur second hald....SB

newsguy35 · Post by **newsguy35** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:48 am

Lakeviewing wrote:Who really cares. Play somebody important

I would say EGF and TRF are pretty important and they have won both of those games. Those games were pretty much for the #2 seed and they prevailed. The real question is can they win when it counts. It would be nice to see somebody not wearing black and gold in the state tournament from this section...

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:25 pm

Sorry, not going to happen this year.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:37 pm

SB24 wrote:Sorry, not going to happen this year.

You might be right SB. But recent events have called into question your powers of prediction.

TTpuckster · Post by **TTpuckster** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:58 pm

TTpuckster wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
TTpuckster wrote:Whatever Schwany.......

Come Jan 24th = 1st Loss for the PR crew. Doesn't matter where the game is.
Wanna put your trailer house on it?...
Naw, as much as I believe I am right, I can't risk losing this..

The view is spectacular.
(It's not too far from the old village of the smoky hills west of PR.)

Well schwangy.

Time to pay up.
Although I didn't really agree to the bet, that was such an impressive win last night that I think I should give you the deed.

You'll like the view.
As long as your not in the basement like I was, (somebody pointed that out)

So let me know where to send the keys and the title.

More power the PR!!!!!!!!

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:43 pm

TTpuckster wrote:
TTpuckster wrote:
schwang17 wrote: Wanna put your trailer house on it?...
Naw, as much as I believe I am right, I can't risk losing this..

The view is spectacular.
(It's not too far from the old village of the smoky hills west of PR.)
Well schwangy.

Time to pay up.
Although I didn't really agree to the bet, that was such an impressive win last night that I think I should give you the deed.

You'll like the view.
As long as your not in the basement like I was, (somebody pointed that out)

So let me know where to send the keys and the title.

More power the PR!!!!!!!!

I respect that you're a man(I think?) of your word...

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:35 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
SB24 wrote:Sorry, not going to happen this year.
You might be right SB. But recent events have called into question your powers of prediction.

I prob have out predicted most this week, this was the only one i got wrong.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:09 pm

2 shut outs in a row going into their game against Detroit Lakes. If they make 20-0 tonight, surely they should make 26-0.

They make not have the toughest schedule, but they spend their last three games on the road, which will be good for going into sections.

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:20 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:2 shut outs in a row going into their game against Detroit Lakes. If they make 20-0 tonight, surely they should make 26-0.

They make not have the toughest schedule, but they spend their last three games on the road, which will be good for going into sections.

The game was actually canceled...but yes....consistancy is nice going into ANY type of playoffs such as Sections....

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:21 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote: If they make 20-0 tonight, surely they should make 26-0.

Surely won't be tonight in case you haven't noticed...

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:30 pm

This wouldn't help tonight, would it!???...

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:48 pm

schwang17 wrote:This wouldn't help tonight, would it!???...

hahahaha...

TTpuckster · Post by **TTpuckster** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:54 pm

schwang17 wrote:This wouldn't help tonight, would it!???...

Ouch Schwangy.

that really hurts.

MNhockeyfan28 · Post by **MNhockeyfan28** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:12 pm

idk about warroad being the #1 seed after getting shallacked by Roseau tonight............. although roseau is one hell of a team

Undercover Hockey Lover · Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:54 pm

Curious...how does that play into the seeding for Section 8A. If they were a common opponent with PR maybe...but gee...I don't see them on PR's schedule twice wait their not even on there once. Maybe the skirt wearers as Suzy likes to call them have bigger nuts than PR.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Will Park Rapids lose before sections?

Park Rapids

Re: Park Rapids

Re: Park Rapids