4AA - 2007-08 Preview

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

H-M 4 Life
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:01 pm

Post by H-M 4 Life »

Hill-Murray will win this section and any hockey player from hill could beat a player from tartan one on one any day of the week. No Contest
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

Sparlimb wrote:
Govs93 wrote:It seems abundantly clear to me that even if the Govs don't win Section 4AA, we've at least come out smelling like a rose on this thread. :wink:
Govs93's ability to stay classy has been noted. I will mention this to my son and make sure we cheer you on through sections (My allegiance only goes so far though).
Much appreciated. The Govs intend to turn Section 4AA into a travishamockery from the #8 position come February.
wxbxl04
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:20 pm

Post by wxbxl04 »

i know this is old, but its pretty funny that so many hill fans made fun of tartan.. :]
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Post by formerlybackofnet »

Hill and WBL will dominate this section just like they did on old 3AA. But when they get to the big show, that's another question.
sicknasty7722
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:21 pm

Post by sicknasty7722 »

Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
Like I say, I'm not backing HM here... I'm just saying that the timing from a WBL fan on this one isn't very smart. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's "pioneerish". :wink:

If the Bears want to come in and snicker at a HM loss (or any other team for that matter - forget about HM) after they get dropped by an 0-5 team, more power to 'em. Makes you wonder what kind of a fan they are if you ask me. If they cared about their own club, they'd be a little more concerned about them and the turmoil they're wrapped up in at the moment, wouldn't you think?
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

Can't Never Tried wrote:I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:

Do you think that if they had gotten their skates before they went paintballing that they would have "skated away free"?
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Sparlimb wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:

Do you think that if they had gotten their skates before they went paintballing that they would have "skated away free"?
Depends they don't appear to be that "sharp" :roll:
wxbxl04
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:20 pm

Post by wxbxl04 »

Govs93 wrote:
sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
Like I say, I'm not backing HM here... I'm just saying that the timing from a WBL fan on this one isn't very smart. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's "pioneerish". :wink:

If the Bears want to come in and snicker at a HM loss (or any other team for that matter - forget about HM) after they get dropped by an 0-5 team, more power to 'em. Makes you wonder what kind of a fan they are if you ask me. If they cared about their own club, they'd be a little more concerned about them and the turmoil they're wrapped up in at the moment, wouldn't you think?
what i said wasnt meant to be another hill vs. white bear fight, so i'll rephrase..

congratulations to tartan for proving the hill fans on this topic wrong.
thorhockey
Posts: 335
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:01 pm

Post by thorhockey »

Rankings: December 19, 2007
1 Minnetonka (6-0-0) 50.2
2 Edina (5-0-0) 46.7
3 Centennial (5-1-0) 37.7
4 Owatonna (5-1-0) 36.3
5 Eastview (4-3-1) 35.4
6 Hill-Murray (5-1-0) 34.5
7 Woodbury (6-1-0) 34.4
8 Bloomington Jefferson (6-1-1) 33.7
9 Burnsville (5-3-0) 33.4
10 Rosemount (8-2-0) 33.0
11 Tartan (6-2-0) 32.0

Only 2 Hill campus' in top ten with Central comin' on strong The gappeth closeth

Hill fans (and wanna be's) responses

Tartan is horrible. Razz
6. Tartan: Average team last year that may be worse.
Tartan has emerged as one of the states hockey powerhouses.
This is definately Tartan's section to lose.
7 and 8- The two St. Paul teams and Tartan can battle it out for last place
If you do the math, that means that their team is likely to be worse or at best, the same
"Tartan is horrible at hockey.
We look at the games with Tartan as a measuring stick of our program. We go into that game knowing a win is highly unlikely (but we do watch the movie Miracle before for inspiration) but we just hope by playing the best we can see how the game should be played
Hill-Murray will win this section and any hockey player from hill could beat a player from tartan one on one any day of the week. No Contest
the lonely prediction (mine)
So when you lost to Tartan in the past and when you lose to Tartan in the future do you always use the excuse that you are rebuilding and reloading? I expect Hill to give Tartan a good game.
Take an extra slug of "whine" next time communion comes up
If God can forgive you then i guess I can too. No apologies required.
My gloating soon coming to an end.
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

thorhockey wrote:My gloating soon coming to an end.

I see no reason to quit gloating. No matter what happens in game 2, Tartan will go into sections knowing they have beaten Hill this year. And if WBL continues to fall as it looks like they might, Tartan very well may be the second seed in sections...
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

Sparlimb wrote: Tartan very well may be the second seed in sections...
3rd.

Image
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

Govs93 wrote:3rd.
Image

I meant 2nd after Johnson. Hill can fight Stillwater for #3...
Post Reply