
Rochester Lourdes vs Little Falls 12/15
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: St. Schmo
those were the worst updates ever from GopherPuckPlayer...
Hanowskis goal in the first was a top cheese forehand...
The goal that was disallowed was ruled no goal because a man in the crease...
The disallowed goal was 100% a goal but the refs were extremely out of position. They scrambled to find reasoning for why it was no goal when they came up with the man in the crease call. The ensuing face-off was in the zone...funny how that worked out.
Final score was 3-2. Second straight night the Lourdes hit the post in the final minute.
Unfortunately I had to sit next to some true gems from the Falls who for sure were the biggest babies I'd ever seen at a hockey game. If you're going to whine about something, at least know the rules.
Hanowskis goal in the first was a top cheese forehand...
The goal that was disallowed was ruled no goal because a man in the crease...
The disallowed goal was 100% a goal but the refs were extremely out of position. They scrambled to find reasoning for why it was no goal when they came up with the man in the crease call. The ensuing face-off was in the zone...funny how that worked out.
Final score was 3-2. Second straight night the Lourdes hit the post in the final minute.
Unfortunately I had to sit next to some true gems from the Falls who for sure were the biggest babies I'd ever seen at a hockey game. If you're going to whine about something, at least know the rules.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
Well I was just going by what the radio anouncer was saying, though I would have rather been there in person.George Blanda wrote:those were the worst updates ever from GopherPuckPlayer...
Hanowskis goal in the first was a top cheese forehand...
The goal that was disallowed was ruled no goal because a man in the crease...
The disallowed goal was 100% a goal but the refs were extremely out of position. They scrambled to find reasoning for why it was no goal when they came up with the man in the crease call. The ensuing face-off was in the zone...funny how that worked out.
Final score was 3-2. Second straight night the Lourdes hit the post in the final minute.
Unfortunately I had to sit next to some true gems from the Falls who for sure were the biggest babies I'd ever seen at a hockey game. If you're going to whine about something, at least know the rules.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:36 am
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:28 pm
lourdes
couple of tough back to back losses for the eagles, but this type of tough scheduling will prepare them for the sections better than playing a bunch
of cupcakes. their record might not be the best but they'll be better tested by crunchtime and won't choke in the big games.losing wylam will hurt, but hopefully he can make it back before the end of the season.
of cupcakes. their record might not be the best but they'll be better tested by crunchtime and won't choke in the big games.losing wylam will hurt, but hopefully he can make it back before the end of the season.