WBL/Woodbury

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

White Bear Lake vs Woodbury

White Bear Lake
22
58%
Woodbury
16
42%
 
Total votes: 38

east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

komada77 wrote:
B wrote:
HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:Why would you be surprised they are losing? they are losing to teams that are a little better than them. White Bear fans need to relax and let this team try and build. They are not the talent laden team that some people like to think they are. Above average at this time, no better. By the end of the year they will have a shot at playing Hill to go to state along with Roseville and Stillwater. The talent is definately down across the board in the S.E.C. thats part of the reason some of us are moving elsewhere. Fans of these teams will blame coaches and refs all year but the reality is that they are very average with a chance to become pretty good by the end.
im very surprised. all their games they have lost have been by 1 or more.with an exception of moorhead who had 2 empty netters...but they are losing to teams they shouldnt be. i mean, when you put in a goal off of your own teams skate(woodbury)that basically gave the game away in the third, and lose to 2 good teams up in moorhead and fargo by very small margins i just think WBL keeps falling short. and hockeyscout you cant tell me its not a coaches mistake when with a minute left in this game WBL puts out their 4th line and woodbury puts in their 1st. i mean really?how can you NOT blame the coach?
Is it possible to lose by less than 1?
Nice catch. Image

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:Good hockey game in St. Paul tonight. White Bear early, Woodbury late, two pretty even teams. I don't think after watching tonight I would say White Bear has any number 1 or number 2 defensemen, just a bunch of 4's and 5's. The best one tonight was number 2 by far. the seniors did some things well but some others not so well. the talent pool is just not what it once was at WB. Woodbury has a very big, hard working team that wore down White Bear and was more physical. I liked what I saw out of a couple of the young guys for Woodbury and they will be watched more closely over the next couple of years. White Bear doesn't have a player that we think can play at the division one level on their team right now.that is a consensus of all of our scouts at this time. I wish both teams well and hope they improve as the year goes on. Hill will be back at state and Woodbury or Cretin out of their section, both have a chance as I feel that neither team is great but that they are evenly matched.

I am being assigned a new region to scout so I won't be around for the first time in quite a few years. I will miss Minnesota high school hockey for now but may be able to sneak back during the playoffs.
I don't know who you scout for, but if that is your observation, I hope its not for any local teams!
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

BodyShots wrote:
HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:Good hockey game in St. Paul tonight. White Bear early, Woodbury late, two pretty even teams. I don't think after watching tonight I would say White Bear has any number 1 or number 2 defensemen, just a bunch of 4's and 5's. The best one tonight was number 2 by far. the seniors did some things well but some others not so well. the talent pool is just not what it once was at WB. Woodbury has a very big, hard working team that wore down White Bear and was more physical. I liked what I saw out of a couple of the young guys for Woodbury and they will be watched more closely over the next couple of years. White Bear doesn't have a player that we think can play at the division one level on their team right now.that is a consensus of all of our scouts at this time. I wish both teams well and hope they improve as the year goes on. Hill will be back at state and Woodbury or Cretin out of their section, both have a chance as I feel that neither team is great but that they are evenly matched.

I am being assigned a new region to scout so I won't be around for the first time in quite a few years. I will miss Minnesota high school hockey for now but may be able to sneak back during the playoffs.
I don't know who you scout for, but if that is your observation, I hope its not for any local teams!
I am pretty sure that he is a pro scout.
spindrift
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:06 am

Post by spindrift »

wbmd wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:Good hockey game in St. Paul tonight. White Bear early, Woodbury late, two pretty even teams. I don't think after watching tonight I would say White Bear has any number 1 or number 2 defensemen, just a bunch of 4's and 5's. The best one tonight was number 2 by far. the seniors did some things well but some others not so well. the talent pool is just not what it once was at WB. Woodbury has a very big, hard working team that wore down White Bear and was more physical. I liked what I saw out of a couple of the young guys for Woodbury and they will be watched more closely over the next couple of years. White Bear doesn't have a player that we think can play at the division one level on their team right now.that is a consensus of all of our scouts at this time. I wish both teams well and hope they improve as the year goes on. Hill will be back at state and Woodbury or Cretin out of their section, both have a chance as I feel that neither team is great but that they are evenly matched.

I am being assigned a new region to scout so I won't be around for the first time in quite a few years. I will miss Minnesota high school hockey for now but may be able to sneak back during the playoffs.
I don't know who you scout for, but if that is your observation, I hope its not for any local teams!
I am pretty sure that he is a pro scout.
Doubt it. Maybe he is #2's Dad?
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Post by formerlybackofnet »

spindrift wrote:
wbmd wrote:
BodyShots wrote: I don't know who you scout for, but if that is your observation, I hope its not for any local teams!
I am pretty sure that he is a pro scout.
Doubt it. Maybe he is #2's Dad?
Must be, #2 is probably the most undertalented D White bear has.
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

formerlybackofnet wrote:
spindrift wrote:
wbmd wrote: I am pretty sure that he is a pro scout.
Doubt it. Maybe he is #2's Dad?
Must be, #2 is probably the most undertalented D White bear has.
you are mistaken. #2 is one of the better returning D that wb has.
Post Reply