AA

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

comp1911
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MN

Post by comp1911 »

Interesting note from both Bantam B and Pee Wee B North regionals. The four teams going to state don't have an A or AA team.
helightsthelamp
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:21 pm

Post by helightsthelamp »

OK give it 94%.... if you want to include the AA and B1 teams...

I disagree on the having both AA and A, but that is my opinion based only on the bias that I don't want to see a large association win the state tournament and think they should field two AA teams if that competitive at the A level...As we have seen, for most associations that is not the case at the end of the day as they did not make it to state with 16-30, but were competitive with many of the 1-15 during the season. Is the A level the right level for many of the assocations that have AA (without a split schedule) yes. Does it mean that I think it is a success if Edina win both A and AA, nope.

Interesting fact... Sartell plays Edina in both PW and Bantam A quarterfinal games at state... Go SARTELL!!!!

I do agree with you has played out excellent for not being well thought out at the beginning.
observer
Posts: 2225
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:45 pm

Post by observer »

Interesting note from both Bantam B and Pee Wee B North regionals. The four teams going to state don't have an A or AA team.
Nice. Congratulations to those associations!
Post Reply