Pioneerprideguy wrote:Disappointed to read Lechner's response. He would rather stay and benefit from his advantages then be in a conference with similiar programs and have to be forced to compete. From an alumni perspective, this is sad.
Kind of surprised me when I read it.
If the roles are reversed and you guys are voted out of the CSC I don't see how we couldn't think we would be next.
I'd definitely be in favor of the catholic league, it would be in the discussion as the 2nd best overall league with the SSC/SEC behind the Lake obviously.
In hockey alone it would be the most competitive conference in the state year after year assuredly. DLS doesn't play hockey so you could play a true round robin which would be a murder's row of scheduling with home/aways vs BSM, HM, TG, STAA etc.
I know a lot of the public supporters are cheering this possibility and honestly all I can do is smh at the notion that they would be in favor of it. I have no doubts that this will make things worse in terms of competitive parity. With opportunities to play this kind of schedule quality inside the MSHSL framework there are plenty of kids that would make the jump no question.
You would be playing against the best of the best for the entire conference season, who would have been the weakest team in the league last year? A 13-12-1 AHA team? Then who? 16-9-1 CDH or 18-8 HF squads? If those are your cellar dweller's records then

.
I said it awhile ago, but public school supporters you got to be careful what you wish for. The law of unintended consequences might come back to bite some of you big time.