bantam A rankings
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:41 pm
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:21 pm
The game happened after the newspaper was published but still Chaska shouldve been ranked anyways. But i wouldnt be surprised to still see them unranked the way these idiots are going
Last edited by ice00breaker on Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:30 pm
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:29 am
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:21 pm
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:40 pm
re: chaska
The fact is that they beat Prior Lake. You never know if the coach didn't play his best players as much or maybe used a weaker goalie but a win is a win. As for tieing against Lakeville North that must have been pre-season or a scrimmage because they are different districts. Sometimes you experiment during scrimmages because the outcome shouldn't matter especially early in the season. I wouldn't rank them very high but let's not write them off because they only beat Prior Lake by a goal.
yes, but you forgot to mention the 2-1 loss they had against them the first time they played. besides they were just scrimmages. pre season is the time to try new things, not try to win all the time.
if woodbury and tartan were to play right now, it would be a much better game then the other two were in the pre season.
if woodbury and tartan were to play right now, it would be a much better game then the other two were in the pre season.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:41 pm
wayzata
where is wayzata up there...they're def top five
Re: wayzata
No they aren't.demtrojans*10-09 wrote:where is wayzata up there...they're def top five