Top Pee Wee A and Bantam A Teams for 2009-2010
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:35 pm
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:53 pm
So your definition of a "Meathead" is a individual that steps up to the plate willing to donate his time to educate some 14-15 year old kids rather than sit up in the stands and complain about what the "Coach" is doing. I am assuming you were that personMaxSnatch wrote:The Coon Rapids coach can't do any worse than the Meathead they had behind the bench last year.

-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:35 pm
No kids on this team. You ever met him.....you would know what I mean - Jelly Bean!!blueliner5 wrote:So your definition of a "Meathead" is a individual that steps up to the plate willing to donate his time to educate some 14-15 year old kids rather than sit up in the stands and complain about what the "Coach" is doing. I am assuming you were that personMaxSnatch wrote:The Coon Rapids coach can't do any worse than the Meathead they had behind the bench last year.

-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:03 am
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:35 pm
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:23 am
I think STMA was on my radar a little while ago.Ron Hextall wrote:Below are my lists of teams to watch, some new, some as always. But it is early and their will be some interesting things to be seen from teams in the upcoming season.
Ten Peewee A Teams to watch:
Changing of the guard in D8?
Rochester - Top player from last year returns, should be a contender in D8.
Rosemount - Super team moves on to peewees, although squirt success doesn't always indicate peewee success, first year players will add to one of the best forwards in D8 and one of its top goalies.
Farmington - Same as Rosemount, although not as much returning as it will be the players coming up that carry the load.
Hastings - some good returners from a competitive peewee team last year, could surprise a few people.
Prior Lake - Good crop coming up, growing program in D6.
Edina - How dominant will they be? The reasoning for two squirt teams will be evaluated on how this team does or will they have two?
STMA - Squirt super group, how will they handle the jump to peewee hockey? Can they back-up the hype or just another D5 mirage.
Forest Lake - Should be able to build on last years success with a solid squirt group coming in.
Osseo-Maple Grove - Second year of merger, should be better than the first right?
Jefferson - Is their reorganization going to start paying dividends, their coach should be coming back as well.
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
-
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:31 am
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:23 am
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:14 pm
Flake went back to inhouse evaluators, could just be a coincidenceRon Hextall wrote:No doubt.
I am wondering myself about the Forest Lake one.

or it could be that most of the kids play other sports in the summer and they don't hit the ground running as fast as some other teams....only time will tell.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:07 pm
- Location: Southwest Mpls
Edina or Duluth should be #1 centenial isn't very good, lost to edina 14-0FrooTyeagledad2b wrote:Lose players at the Bantam level? Don't think so, no coaching you are rightFire and Ice wrote:Once again the same old will run the level
Wayzata
Edina
White Bear
Centennial
Eden Prairie
Rochester
Roseau
Moorhead
Duluth E
no particular order
see how much peewees counts when they are Bantams most of the "could be squads" stay also rans save this one for March 2010
Coon Rapids will lose too many of there players and no coaching
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:55 pm
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:53 pm
Re: Internal Issues
troogracefan wrote:We all know there are internal issues no matter what city you live in. In response to the Coon Rapids situation, an outside coach for this group is truely whats best for these kids. If the board has found a coach that has some experience at this age level and can successfully concentrate on the players, these kids will be ok. The coaches that took the Bantams to state years ago were 2 dads whose kids deserved to play and a Dad that went along for the ride. He was removed from the board because he coached a group of young men from squirts on up, then yanks his kid before his second year of bantams because he felt his son was too good for the kids he was responsible for helping develop? Guess what, he put his name in the hat again for this group(3rd boy thru the program) and has recently been announced as an assistant for the another cities HS team?? Gee, i wonder where this son will go to HS next year, but yet he wants to coach in the Cr program again??
This example is why it is important to have outside coaches involved; it will be the only way these kids have a chance to succeed. If another parent coached this team, there would without a doubt be kids from this team playing HS and that would not do the kids any good. The kids get along and have a chance to be a decent team, but this group of parents will do everything in their power to watch this guy fail. It would be nice to see all the parents actually sit in the stands this year, enjoy their sons performances and support this outside coach. Time will tell.
troogracefan......do you still believe that a outside coach is the right move for this team? All I can do is base my opinion on from what I am hearing and it is not a good thing. Is it true that the players have lost all respect for the coach? If, that is the case the rest of the season does not look to bright. Reading another post is the coach actually going to hang it up and quit? You seem to be more in the know than I am