housley 2010.

stilly5hm3 · Post by **stilly5hm3** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 pm

f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:01 pm

mj79 wrote:
gfhockey wrote:nanne to edina is frank and doog to gophers
well yea, but thats obvious, especially now his grandson is on the team... But Nanne is actually a good commentator unlike woog, who is actually more annoying than housley

That's for sure that Woog is a lot more annoying. I would rather listen to Housley any day.

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:05 pm

stilly5hm3 wrote:f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.

Agreed.

Kevin Gorg is terrible. Again, I would rather listen to Housley over Doug Woog or Kevin Gorg any day.

royals03 · Post by **royals03** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:54 pm

Housely sounds a lot like the players they interview after the games, and why shouldn't he he is at their education level.

I mean he graduated from S. ST Paul and then went to the NHL I am sure he was not part of any study groups while he played in the Pros.

royals03 · Post by **royals03** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:55 pm

Did you know teams play championship hockey in championship games

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:33 pm

He doesn't seem to know the rules. Stammers his way through what he's saying. Just plain terrible, can't stand listening to him.

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:35 pm

wbmd wrote:
Goldy Gopher wrote:
wbmd wrote: To all of your complaints that will be posted about Phil Housley and any other media specialist throughout the State Tournament.

I'd bet that the majority of you guys and gals couldn't do any better.
I take that bet. There is 0 doubt in my mind that I could do a better job.
Then apply for the job so that everyone can cut you down next year.

As long as my contract is finding out where the cheapest gas is, put my name down.

bronco2828 · Post by **bronco2828** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:38 pm

Someone tell Channel 45 to pay the money to get Don Cherry next year. Love him or hate him Don Cherry keeps you listening.

firehousley · Post by **firehousley** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:17 pm

I would bet that he makes a good 5% of people or more not watch the games on TV because they can't stand his announcing. I can't withstand more than a little while of his hockey 'insights'. This is the best hockey mind in the state? They want more viewers? Get a replacement for Housley.

Red Ice · Post by **Red Ice** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:22 pm

Not really Housley's fault. Let him be in on the studio show. Have professional hockey announcers call the games. FSN could do a lot better.

StayAtHomeD · Post by **StayAtHomeD** » Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:22 pm

Wow, so much hatred for Housley. You guys sound like a bunch of disrespected little girls.

Grow a pair.

royals03 · Post by **royals03** » Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:17 pm

StayAtHomeD wrote:Wow, so much hatred for Housley. You guys sound like a bunch of disrespected little girls.

Grow a pair.

If I grow a pair will Housley be better because if that is what it takes I will do it

BBB · Post by **BBB** » Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:46 pm

Someone tell Channel 45 to pay the money to get Don Cherry next year. Love him or hate him Don Cherry keeps you listening.

Lets keep guys in there that have close ties to MN HS, youth, college, and pro hockey. Not some guy who hasn't been around our hs hockey and is pro-canadian, major jr hockey. That's my vote anyway.

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:21 pm

I thought Housley did a pretty good job in the final. Just my opinion -

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:45 pm

MNHockeyFan wrote:I thought Housley did a pretty good job in the final. Just my opinion -

I thought he was just fine in the entire tournament. Just as good as Clay Matvik and Lou Nanne.

wingmaster · Post by **wingmaster** » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:03 am

firehousley wrote:The job Housley has done on the air is absolutely pitiful, and has never improved. If you are getting paid to do this, at least put a little studying in before you get on the air -- it's not like you have a day job! Just because you were a good player doesn't mean you will be a good announcer or a good coach. All this proves is that the station has no standards for quality; rather, they just want a 'famous' name and they hope no one will notice the eighth grade vocabulary and syntax being used. It's an insult to our intelligence for them to assume the viewers are satisfied with this guy after all the years he's been on--if they cared what the viewers think they'd get a decent replacement. Of course they will never boot him; hopefully he wises up and sees he's doing more bad than good to his reputation doing this job.

so did you watch? as said above he doesn't have a day job so what does he really care about what all or us thnk? by the way he has a 12th grade education and themn went pro on to his way to not needing a day job.

StayAtHomeD · Post by **StayAtHomeD** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:23 am

wingmaster wrote:
firehousley wrote:The job Housley has done on the air is absolutely pitiful, and has never improved. If you are getting paid to do this, at least put a little studying in before you get on the air -- it's not like you have a day job! Just because you were a good player doesn't mean you will be a good announcer or a good coach. All this proves is that the station has no standards for quality; rather, they just want a 'famous' name and they hope no one will notice the eighth grade vocabulary and syntax being used. It's an insult to our intelligence for them to assume the viewers are satisfied with this guy after all the years he's been on--if they cared what the viewers think they'd get a decent replacement. Of course they will never boot him; hopefully he wises up and sees he's doing more bad than good to his reputation doing this job.
so did you watch? as said above he doesn't have a day job so what does he really care about what all or us thnk? by the way he has a 12th grade education and themn went pro on to his way to not needing a day job.

HAHA, well said

ilbok · Post by **ilbok** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:13 am

wbmd wrote:
MNHockeyFan wrote:I thought Housley did a pretty good job in the final. Just my opinion -
I thought he was just fine in the entire tournament. Just as good as Clay Matvik and Lou Nanne.

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:24 pm

wbmd wrote:
stilly5hm3 wrote:f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.
Agreed.

Kevin Gorg is terrible. Again, I would rather listen to Housley over Doug Woog or Kevin Gorg any day.

wbmd + Housley = ♥

DuluthHockeyBoy · Post by **DuluthHockeyBoy** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:47 pm

How about sharing a little of this Housley-love with Darby? The only thing positive I can say about him is that finally somebody wrestled him down and gave him a haircut you can actually look at. I would say he is definately in that Housley-Woog-Gorg category. I think Nanne has improved and spread the love much more than he used to. I don't notice his love for Edina as much anymore. He is also credible.
I am surprised that in the state of hockey we can't do a little better. The Wild and Gopher games are hard to listen to, and feature marginal talent in my opinion.
They do provide for some great comedy though: can't beat those "on ice" segments the mighty-mites from the announcing group do for the Wild broadcasts. Like a bad American Idol act. Over and over.
Oh, to have Al Shaver back......