Girls state not at Xcel

Fanofhockey
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:45 am

Girls state not at Xcel

Post by Fanofhockey »

Here's my thoughts on the girls hockey players sueing the high school league for inequality because they don't get to play state at the Xcel, thus leading to no replay which was frustrating while at the games. Girls, how bout you pay to rent out the Xcel for 3 days and you can reap the profits (a big fat ZERO) from that then if you want this so bad. Im sorry to say but you won't even fill half of the lower bowl for any of your games. The whole topic deals with economics, and girls you just arent going to bring in the money needed to play at the x. How bout we fight for equality in common sense, because you have none, and everyone else seems to have it. I think you should be happy at ridder. Its a lot better then the fairgrounds. Now give us our replay back please. <p></p><i></i>
bucksony
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:20 pm

Re: Girls state not at Xcel

Post by bucksony »

Writer, 'Fanofhockey', very well written and I support this 100%. I agree, lets see somebody make sense and reply back to your response. <p></p><i></i>
ROYALELK
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 1:04 pm

FAN

Post by ROYALELK »

well done....did you post this on girls HS hockey forum also? <p></p><i></i>
Fanofhockey
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:45 am

thoughts

Post by Fanofhockey »

I just decided to write this because some friends and myself were pretty pissed that those girls even thought about sueing the mshsl, and then once it affected the boys state tourny i had had enough. <p></p><i></i>
hibbing superfan
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:21 pm

girls hockey

Post by hibbing superfan »

i heard from some players on our team that they had 2 large tvs in the locker rooms at the X but they weren;t allowed to turn them on because the girls dont have them @ ridder. <p></p><i></i>
Blackhawk27
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:43 am

wow

Post by Blackhawk27 »

thats sad abotu the tvs i mean the girls should play at ridder cuz thats the highest level of girls hockey in minnesota u no they should be happy they get that <p></p><i></i>
bucksony
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:20 pm

Re: FAN

Post by bucksony »

Great idea! Definetly post this on the girls hockey forum and see what responses you get. <p></p><i></i>
wbl hock doc5
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 3:21 pm

FINALLY!!!!

Post by wbl hock doc5 »

FINALLY!!!! Someone agrees with me! I posted almost this exact point in the "NO REPLAYS" topic. I agree with you 100% Let them do it and rent it out (if the X would be that stupid), but when they fall on their asses they have absolutely no one to blame but themselves. Like i said before, it took the boys 60 years to get to the best arena in the world, and the girls can't expect to do it in 10... <p></p><i></i>
NeedsMoreCowbell
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:11 pm

amen...

Post by NeedsMoreCowbell »

the second its economically feasable for the girls to play at the X, im all for them moving there. until then, they should enjoy Ridder, the smaller arena brings in a great atmosphere they wouldnt get at the X right now. <p></p><i></i>
clubsoda66
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:17 pm

Re: Girls state not at Xcel

Post by clubsoda66 »

I think that if girls hockey whats to sue the MSHSL they should sue for not having an 8 team singal A tourny. Going down to a state tourny and only having 4 teams. It they want to sue over equal rights they should be sueing about not having a full tourny to play at, not about where they play. They will never in a million years fill the Xcel. <p></p><i></i>
Locked