JV STATE RANKING
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am
JV STATE RANKING
Im just curious to see what people think on this one? Some have even talked about bringing back a state tourny for them. It is the only level that I know of that does not have a post season!
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
Re: JV STATE RANKING
I would say no, since JV rosters are ever-changing....a number of JV teams could be the best in the state at one time depending on who drops down from their varsity to play.THEGunslinger wrote:Im just curious to see what people think on this one? Some have even talked about bringing back a state tourny for them. It is the only level that I know of that does not have a post season!
-
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:30 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Alright hear is my piece on this. I think this is one of the dumbest ideas i have ever heard. No one really cares about the jv programs other than the coaches and parents of the jv players. The only thing a good jv team shows is that you have potential in upcoming years. A jv state tournament would be a terrible idea. Then a coach with players on both jv and varsity could just send them down to jv so there team is better. This program is for developing kids to get to the varsity level, not to see who has the best players that arent able to play varsity level in the state.
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:01 pm
written by THEGunslinger
This rule is enforced even without jv state tourney. A player can only play 4 periods within 24 hours. I think this would still work if there was a jv state tourney becuase if there was a good player on varsity the coach would want him up there all 3 periods. Making him only be able to play 1 period in the jv game. Which i think is fine just to give the team a little boost or just for some extra men.I agree.... Rules could be easily implemented.... Something of the fact that you cant make a roster change etc after a certain date... or players can only have so much varsity time...
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:56 am
No--JV teams should not be ranked or have a state tournament. What they should be allowed to do is have a playoff within their own conference at seasons end. As of right now, you get 25 games and thats it, and the MSHSL does not recognize a JV playoff, so teams would be in violation if they had those games. That way, those kids still have something to play for. Anybody on the Varsity roster for playoffs, should not be eligible
"The Godfather"
"The Godfather"
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:50 pm
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:25 am
well then tell me where i can find it (way to lazy to look myself)boblee wrote:Yes, this is a rule.hawkfan70 wrote:are you sure about this rule?FutureSeaWolve wrote: This rule is enforced even without jv state tourney. A player can only play 4 periods within 24 hours.
where is it written
i am not doubting you, I have just never seen it
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 6:36 pm
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:01 pm
Why not? Just because they aren't good enough or not serious enough about hockey to make varsity doesn't mean that they shouldn't be able to play. I know a couple seniors who play jv and have a great time, so why take it away they aren't different then any of the other players on jv.murraychadwick wrote:How about Seniors? We've had topics on here discussing Pros/Cons of playing seniors on JV. Some conferences have bylaws saying you can't.
Seniors
If a senior is not good enough to play on the varsity, why shouldn't they be eligible for JV In many cases a senior has played competitve hockey for 10-13 years, and all the sudden just because they aren't good enough for varsity they need to sit? Is there an alternative league for a senior who is denied V and JV? If not then they should definately be eligible, especially those at private schools who might be beaten out by transfers.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:56 pm