Most Over/Under Rated Teams BB1

HockeyGuru#6 · Post by **HockeyGuru#6** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:40 pm

What teams are the most over or under rated

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:13 pm

Over rated- Lakeville South and North
Under- Eagen

outdoorshcky17 · Post by **outdoorshcky17** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:21 pm

over rated - wayzata blue (not by much)

under rated - chaska

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:25 pm

I don't know about Chaska. They kicked Rochester Red in Duluth then didn't do squat. They seem up and down.

outdoorshcky17 · Post by **outdoorshcky17** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:28 pm

that is true they are not a very consistent team

HShockey2180 · Post by **HShockey2180** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:16 pm

Wasn't it 8-1 vs Rochester Red? Then at MWR I recall them not making it out of their pool on top or getting past the first round of bracket play, is this correct?

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:38 am

I thought I said " They kicked Rochester Red in Duluth then didn't do squat. " I would say 8-1 is kicked. I was talking about Chaska not RR. I heard RR lost to WB 4-1 at MWR & EPR 5-1. I would say by looking at the rankings RR must have played better at Edina then they did in Duluth.

Turk182 · Post by **Turk182** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:56 am

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:48 am

I'd like to see Chisago Lakes play some of those teams. In Roseville they looked very good but just didn't have enought players.

Cross_Bar_In · Post by **Cross_Bar_In** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:18 am

Elk River is the most over-rated team in the state... They should deffinately not be ranked in the top 5...

ShootPassScore · Post by **ShootPassScore** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:40 am

I agree with Cross Bar. They have won bad tournaments. I dont believe they have what it takes and would be bottom half in D6.

LesHabs · Post by **LesHabs** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:57 am

Elk River is not over rated. They are a deep squad with plenty of skill and speed. I also think Chisago Lakes will prove to be under rated. I just need to see them play more against higher-level competition.

ice00breaker · Post by **ice00breaker** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:45 pm

About Elk River: They are a very consistent team that constantly plays good hockey and is where they should be.

Chaska: Too inconsistent to be under or overrated. Sometimes top 5 material other times not even top 20.

Edina Green: Doesn't play the best hockey in the world but seems to squeak out wins all the time

My Picks are Edina Green overrated and Chisago Lakes underrated

tomASS · Post by **tomASS** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:23 pm

ice00breaker wrote:About Elk River: They are a very consistent team that constantly plays good hockey and is where they should be.

Chaska: Too inconsistent to be under or overrated. Sometimes top 5 material other times not even top 20.

Edina Green: Doesn't play the best hockey in the world but seems to squeak out wins all the time

My Picks are Edina Green overrated and Chisago Lakes underrated

Icebreaker - well stated about Chaska and Elk River. Will not touch Edina Green since both games we played them we played a man short for most of a period each game. I would like to see CL play some tougher teams but maybe deserve more respect

HShockey2180 · Post by **HShockey2180** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:51 pm

HockeyRocks1 wrote:I thought I said " They kicked Rochester Red in Duluth then didn't do squat. " I would say 8-1 is kicked. I was talking about Chaska not RR. I heard RR lost to WB 4-1 at MWR & EPR 5-1. I would say by looking at the rankings RR must have played better at Edina then they did in Duluth.

I also call 8-1 "kicked" I was just unsure of the score and asking for clarification. And I was also talking about Chaska, when I said they didn't make it deep in the MWR tourney. Also, RR was not in the MWR and neither was WBL, or EP Red; I'm assuming you mean Edina tourney? Which Chaska was not in. My point was, Chaska beat EP Black 2-0, won and lost against Wayzata Gold 3-2 (win) and 4-2 (Loss), and lost to Blaine 5-3, and 3-0. Settle down and get your facts straight before you flame someone elses. Most underrated teams are rated lower, because of lack of consistency, not to say there isn't occasionally an outlier. Chaska has both big wins, and bad losses. Underranked, and certainly not a team you want to face come February/March in the playoffs.

When i've seen Burnsville play, they seemed worthy of a higher ranking, although they won't get it because of the tough district schedule in which any team can win on a given night and they have no huge wins under their belt. Pretty solid goaltending as well.

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:41 pm

I'd agree with not wanting to play an under-rated team. From what I've seen this season there are a lot of teams that are inconsistant which suprised me.

I'm guessing the consistant teams are made up of more second year players. With that said the teams with combo first/second year kids should be coming on strong and making a big push at playoff time.

Let the Feb. Fun begin.

DAbears25 · Post by **DAbears25** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:49 pm

HockeyRocks1 wrote:I'd agree with not wanting to play an under-rated team. From what I've seen this season there are a lot of teams that are inconsistant which suprised me.

I'm guessing the consistant teams are made up of more second year players. With that said the teams with combo first/second year kids should be coming on strong and making a big push at playoff time.

Let the Feb. Fun begin.

What suprised me is that some people dont even know how to spell "consistent".

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:04 pm

Guess we should sue our former english teachers for doing a piss poor job or cut our fingers off because we can't type!

Co[D]18 · Post by **Co[D]18** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:37 pm

HockeyRocks1 wrote:Guess we should sue our former english teachers for doing a piss poor job or cut our fingers off because we can't type!

Or just sue the teacher that taught you. You should have put a comma after "job".

SiouxFAN · Post by **SiouxFAN** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:10 pm

I watched Maple Grove beat Edina Green and they looked very good. I think they are underated.

State Champ 97 · Post by **State Champ 97** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:37 pm

Co[D]18 Posted: 18 Jan 2007 02:37 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HockeyRocks1 wrote:
Guess we should sue our former english teachers for doing a piss poor job or cut our fingers off because we can't type!

Or just sue the teacher that taught you. You should have put a comma after "job".

I say kick yourself for not paying attention in English class.

Turk182 · Post by **Turk182** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 2:42 pm

tomASS · Post by **tomASS** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:04 pm

Co[D]18 wrote:
HockeyRocks1 wrote:Guess we should sue our former english teachers for doing a piss poor job or cut our fingers off because we can't type!
Or just sue the teacher that taught you. You should have put a comma after "job".

Sorry a comma is not a necessity after a phrase joined by a conjunction.
Just thought I would throw that out there and back to hockey

thecorrespondent · Post by **thecorrespondent** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:22 pm

re Maple Grove: Actually they have 1 loss along with Blue and Blake. They have beaten Gold twice thus far, tied blake and got beat soundly by Blue.

Being ranked 4th in d3 is a bit mis leading with Mg, Blake, and Blue having 1 loss each and Gold having 3. The difference thus far is Fair play points and games played.

Where you are ranked in D3 will not matter anyways since it is a 4, maybe a 3 team race come districts (not a very strong district after 4),with I think 3 teams getting to regions.

I agree Mg is not an underated team at 13, and agreed they will need some more big wins to crack the top 10.

They are definately capable of being a top 10 team because of defense and goal tending. There are 20-25 teams that are capable of beating each other on any given night, so we will see who is overrated and underrated come region time.

Co[D]18 · Post by **Co[D]18** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:17 pm

tomASS wrote:
Co[D]18 wrote:
HockeyRocks1 wrote:Guess we should sue our former english teachers for doing a piss poor job or cut our fingers off because we can't type!
Or just sue the teacher that taught you. You should have put a comma after "job".

Sorry a comma is not a necessity after a phrase joined by a conjunction.
Just thought I would throw that out there and back to hockey

You made it a run-on sentance.