NW Suburban Conference

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:09 pm

FormerBlaineBengal01 wrote:Centennial escapes with a one goal victory over the Cardnials with a power play goal with 28 seconds left in the 3rd. What happened in this one? Did they over look Coon Rapids and prepare for Moorhead a game early?

Centennial really is just an average team.

MNSS · Post by **MNSS** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:26 pm

At 15-4 I doubt they are an average team with a loss to Roseville, Holy Angels, WBL (ot), and AHE. two of the losses were Nov 30 and Dec 2. Then the whole conference is crap I guess.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:13 pm

BIGSEXY wrote: Centennial really is just an average team.

Centennial 5, Blaine 3

BIGSEXY wrote: I just blew what little credibility I had.

Yep...

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:15 pm

neutOwned

FormerBlaineBengal01 · Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:24 pm

Well they did drop a game 8-3 to Roseville and than lost 8-2 to AHA so when they lose they lose big

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:26 pm

A loss is a loss is a loss. 1 goal or 40, it's still not a W.

rbk28 · Post by **rbk28** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:31 pm

BIGSEXY wrote:
lefty65 wrote:andover beat osseo 4-1 tonight to move up to #6 in the confrence
Here they come!!!

haha!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:52 pm

BIGSEXY wrote: Centennial really is just an average team.

Centennial 5, Blaine 3

BIGSEXY wrote: I just blew what little credibility I had. At least FormerBlaineBengal01 joined me.

Yep...

Purehockey · Post by **Purehockey** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:32 pm

Centennial is a good team and so is blaine this is a good conference. But also when CR lost 6-0 to the Elks they were missing one of there starting D.

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:05 pm

12/9/06
Cent 3
Osseo 2

12/16
Cent 3
CP 2

1/11
Cent 2
Andover 1

1/27
Cent 2
CP 1

1/30
Cent 6
CR 5

To use the word "average" when describing Centennial was not the correct. What I was trying to say is that they aren't the top 10 team that everyone is now labeling them as. Giving up 5 goals against CR, c'mon now. They are a couple different bounces away from being a 3-4 loss team in the conference. These are pretty bad teams they are beating by one goal.

gomnhky · Post by **gomnhky** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:41 pm

Centennial is better than an "average" team but maybe is average compared to past Centennial star-powered teams. And regardless of some of their scores against teams in the NWSC, they still find a way to win, and that's the bottom line. Both Centennial and Blaine are young teams that are finding ways to win in a tough conference. I don't think it's a good idea to belittle any of the other teams in this conference as any of them are capable of giving another team a good battle. No one should overlook anyone in this conference regardless of their record or previous scores.

big_thurst · Post by **big_thurst** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:51 pm

Elks 9
North Metro 2

rbk28 · Post by **rbk28** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:54 pm

how bout scores from anoka-coon rapids, maple grove-centennial, it was AHA-8 Osseo-1 last time i heard

big_thurst · Post by **big_thurst** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:56 pm

Final

AHA 8
Osseo 2

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:26 pm

Blaine 9
Andover 1

I hate to compare this game to the Centennial-Andover matchup but...

rbk28 · Post by **rbk28** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:28 pm

BIGSEXY wrote:Blaine 9
Andover 1

I hate to compare this game to the Centennial-Andover matchup but...

Ouch

just as andover was comin on too lol

big_thurst · Post by **big_thurst** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:28 pm

MG 3
Cent 2

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:33 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
BIGSEXY wrote: Centennial really is just an average team.
Centennial 5, Blaine 3

BIGSEXY wrote: I just blew what little credibility I had.
Yep...

MG 3
Cent 2

I only wish I can someday be as smart as Neutron.

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:41 pm

rbk28 wrote:
BIGSEXY wrote:Blaine 9
Andover 1

I hate to compare this game to the Centennial-Andover matchup but...
Ouch just as andover was comin on too lol

Yea where's Wizcek he needs a talking to, he wasn't up to his stellar self tonight.

big_thurst · Post by **big_thurst** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:44 pm

He was probably like minus 6 or 7

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:47 pm

big_thurst wrote:He was probably like minus 6 or 7

I don't think he even had that many shifts. I was looking for him and only noticed him when he was heading to the box.

big_thurst · Post by **big_thurst** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:51 pm

WICZEK!!!!!!

YOU CAN'T DO THAT

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:04 pm

LOL, oh he heard it from us don't you worry $\:D/$

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:11 pm

BIGSEXY wrote: MG 3
Cent 2

I only wish I can someday be as smart as Neutron.

Keep working at it, but I doubt you'll make it. There are 4-5 elite teams in the state. The next 15 or so are pretty good, but have weaknesses. You better get down to 40 before you start calling them average.

And since your team lost to them..... aw never mind.

Rematch the 15th. Should be a good one.

BIGSEXY · Post by **BIGSEXY** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:21 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
BIGSEXY wrote: MG 3
Cent 2

I only wish I can someday be as smart as Neutron.
Keep working at it, but I doubt you'll make it. There are 4-5 elite teams in the state. The next 15 or so are pretty good, but have weaknesses. You better get down to 40 before you start calling them average.

And since your team lost to them..... aw never mind.

Rematch the 15th. Should be a good one.

Exactly, as I said earlier, average wasn't the correct description as they are right in that mix of the 20-30 "2nd notch" teams. I was really only trying to say they aren't a top 10 team and got a little carried away. And the rematch should be awesome...for the Bengals

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

NW Suburban Conference

Who finishes on top?