Section 8 Seedings After 2/6
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:57 pm
Section 8 Seedings After 2/6
1. Warroad
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Park Rapids
5. Crookston
6. Detroit Lakes
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Park Rapids
5. Crookston
6. Detroit Lakes
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
-
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:38 pm
All have work left to do
DL- Could go as high as #4, two home dates left with TRF and Bemidji
EGF- could fall to #6 if they lose to Crk and @TRF
Crk - @EGF, @LOW, @RLF, lose all three and they'll be #7
LOW- could still get the #6 with some help
1. Warroad
2. TRF
3-4 Park, win tonigh locks up no worse than #4
5.
6.
7.
8. Kittson
9. RLF
10. Bagley
DL- Could go as high as #4, two home dates left with TRF and Bemidji
EGF- could fall to #6 if they lose to Crk and @TRF
Crk - @EGF, @LOW, @RLF, lose all three and they'll be #7
LOW- could still get the #6 with some help
1. Warroad
2. TRF
3-4 Park, win tonigh locks up no worse than #4
5.
6.
7.
8. Kittson
9. RLF
10. Bagley
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:57 pm
BillyMac. I don't see any way CRK will lose ALL 3 of those games. LOW would need a ton of help. Their win against DL won't help a ton. DL had to travel up there and play one game. Vavricka allowed 5 of 7 shots before being yanked midway through the 1st. DL will more than likely lose to TRF and possibly to BEM. EGF will fall to 4th at the lowest. As the title says though, As of 2/6. We will see won't we? Almost anything could happen, it's just a matter of how realistic you wanna be 

Re: Section 8 Seedings After 2/6
I would agree with this assessment as well.wolfpack33 wrote:1. Warroad
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Park Rapids
5. Crookston
6. Detroit Lakes
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
-
- Posts: 3013
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm
Re: Section 8 Seedings After 2/6
Looks good ,what happened to baudette are they in a building year.schwang17 wrote:I would agree with this assessment as well.wolfpack33 wrote:1. Warroad
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Park Rapids
5. Crookston
6. Detroit Lakes
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
Park Rapids?
At this point, why wouldn't Park Rapids be ahead of EGF?
They have a better section 8 record and they tied their only game?

They have a better section 8 record and they tied their only game?





-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
You have to realize that they weigh the last part of the season way more than the first half! So the Tie with Park and EGF is a non factor if EGF beats CROX and TRF. IF EGF beats CROX they will be seeded ahead of them and if they also beat TRF I see them as the #2 seed. IF they lose to both of those teams or split they will be a # 4 or #5 seed I have a question for all you Park fans who have they beat to say they are a #3 seed right now? Not being a jerk just want to know? Beating Crox alone doesen't make you a #3 seed. and a tie with EGF in early December doesn't work either.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:57 pm
DL will be seeded ahead of LOW because of the reasons stated in my 2nd post on this thread...
"LOW would need a ton of help. Their win against DL won't help a ton. DL had to travel up there that morning to play one game. Vavricka allowed 5 of 7 shots before being yanked midway through the 1st." A slow start in Baudette was expected and after they got going they dominated the play. LOW has had little success against the rest of the section and THAT is why DL will go ahead of Baudette. EGF will not go below CROX, "You can make book on that Missy."
"LOW would need a ton of help. Their win against DL won't help a ton. DL had to travel up there that morning to play one game. Vavricka allowed 5 of 7 shots before being yanked midway through the 1st." A slow start in Baudette was expected and after they got going they dominated the play. LOW has had little success against the rest of the section and THAT is why DL will go ahead of Baudette. EGF will not go below CROX, "You can make book on that Missy."
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:47 pm
Re: Section 8 Seedings After 2/6
wolfpack33 wrote:1. Warroad
2. Thief River Falls
3. East Grand Forks
4. Park Rapids
5. Crookston
6. Detroit Lakes
7. Baudette
8. Kittson Central
9. Red Lake Falls
10. Bagley-Fosston
This all looks good and i think this is how it'll end up. I was at the PR-Crook game last night. Great game to watch, PR looked so much better than the last time i watched them. Crookston played their usual game, tough as ever, they played hard, but credit Lehrke and company, taking one from da Pirates in their own rink is not an easy task. PR is getting better at the right time of the year. Still a lot of important section contests to go to know who will be seeded where. It will be interesting!
Last edited by the mullet on Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:47 pm
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:56 am
the mullet wrote:Answer- If that is how the seeding did work out, Who besides the #2 seed then has beaten themI have a question for all you Park fans who have they beat to say they are a #3 seed right now?![]()
![]()
the one problem i see for them is they tied DL, were EGF beat them in DL kinda hard to say you should be the higher seed when you play the weaker schedule!