Moorhead at the Jefferson House - Sat nite

hockeylover · Post by **hockeylover** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:18 am

The game is at 7:30

golden · Post by **golden** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:42 am

Moorhead's website says 2:30 game time. Was it changed???

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:46 am

Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:28 am

fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime

You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.

CitiesSpudsGuy · Post by **CitiesSpudsGuy** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:33 am

Well, since there seemed to be conflicting info on the game time, I called the BIG and it is scheduled for a 7:30 start. Just FYI for anybody else who thought it was at 2:30, like me.

cuda701 · Post by **cuda701** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:34 am

Bash Brother wrote:
fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime
You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.

There must be quite a few delusional people then.......

There won't be running time in this game. TTYL

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:39 pm

cuda701 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:
fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime
You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.
There must be quite a few delusional people then.......

There won't be running time in this game. TTYL

I AGREE - NO RUNNING TIME. SPUDS ARE ONLY GONNA WIN BY 5 !

breakout · Post by **breakout** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:03 pm

Spuds should dominate by 3 to 5 goals. Jefferson's D and goalie will have trouble even with the possible line match up of Levine's line vs. Christian's line. Too much horsepower/depth on the spuds side for Jefferson to handle.

baldbobl · Post by **baldbobl** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:34 pm

Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional?

Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?

[quote="cuda701"]It's easy to be a "sideline quarterback". Anyway, didn't the soph's score 4 out of 5 goals in the last game? The circumstances may vary on any given day and I myself will leave that decision to people that know better than I.

:)[/quote]

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:08 pm

End of 1st period

Spuds 0
Jags 0

Shots tied @ 9

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:28 pm

1-0 Jags

1-1 Weiss (Foss) PPG

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:33 pm

2-1 Spuds Nitzkorski (Foss, Dietz)

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:45 pm

2-1 after 2

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:48 pm

Stats?

S S

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:49 pm

2-1 after 2

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:52 pm

SPUDNUT wrote:2-1 after 2

Saves?

S S

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:58 pm

Sorry Slap - gettin' updates by cell phone from the game. They're not givin' me the times, penalties, etc.

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:05 pm

'TNKS' anyway!

S S

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:12 pm

3-1 Spuds

5:10 of 3rd Weiss (Nitzkorski)

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:14 pm

baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional? Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?

Bob- Nobody said anything about how the "Sophs" did at the Schwans Cup. Cuda was referring to the Jefferson vs. Rosemount game - the last game they played - in which the Sophomores scored 4 of their 5 goals. Nobody compared Rosemount to Moorhead, either. I know comprehending english is tough, so I'll just correct what you missed and leave all judgements aside. And by the looks of the score so far, the people that picked this game to be a blowout, or that it would go to running time, are the ones who appear to be delusional(BashBrother).

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:16 pm

The spuds continue to run up the score

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:30 pm

Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score

3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?

Potatohead9 · Post by **Potatohead9** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:31 pm

schwang17 wrote:
baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional? Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?
Bob- Nobody said anything about how the "Sophs" did at the Schwans Cup. Cuda was referring to the Jefferson vs. Rosemount game - the last game they played - in which the Sophomores scored 4 of their 5 goals. Nobody compared Rosemount to Moorhead, either. I know comprehending english is tough, so I'll just correct what you missed and leave all judgements aside. And by the looks of the score so far, the people that picked this game to be a blowout, or that it would go to running time, are the ones who appear to be delusional(BashBrother).

Interesting how Cuda and Schwang attack those of us who actually predict a score to the game.

Perhaps they will inform the rest of the posters of how the HOMER REFs played a roll at the BIG tonight.....

If it hasn't been reported yet Shots were 28 Moorhead to 25 Jefferson
Game Moorhead 3-1

golden · Post by **golden** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:33 pm

schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?

Schwang needs a tissue.

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:33 pm

schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?

Awfully defensive of your loser jags.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Moorhead at the Jefferson House - Sat nite

Jefferson or Moorhead?

Re: jags

6,543rd post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

6,544th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

6,545th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

Re: jags

Re: jags