The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.Bash Brother wrote:Awfully defensive of your loser jags.schwang17 wrote:3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
Moorhead at the Jefferson House - Sat nite
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
slapshooter
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
6,547th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
'T
NKS' again!
19-1-1
S
S
NKS' again!19-1-1
S
S-
Bash Brother
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
-
Bash Brother
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
O yeah, i forgot past state titles matter this year.[/quote]schwang17 wrote:The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.Bash Brother wrote:Awfully defensive of your loser jags.
They matter when you call them losers when everybody on this site knows who has lost the most when it counts!
[/quote]Sleepy Eye
-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
I really wanted to but work seems to always get in the way........I have to make sacrifices now so I can make it to the State Tournament!SPUDNUT wrote:Hey Potatohead -
Thought you were goin' down to the game.
CitySpudsGuy was at the game and reports questionable reffing.....
I will wait for his post game comments....
Thats Mr. Potatohead to you!
Re: jags
I didn't attack those who predicted a score. I was attacking Baby Brother for saying someone is delusional for predicting Moorhead would lose.Potatohead9 wrote: Interesting how Cuda and Schwang attack those of us who actually predict a score to the game.
Perhaps they will inform the rest of the posters of how the HOMER REFs played a roll at the BIG tonight.....
If it hasn't been reported yet Shots were 28 Moorhead to 25 Jefferson
Game Moorhead 3-1
Also, I wouldn't go off saying that homer refs had much to do with the score if you weren't there in attendance to actually see it for yourself.
-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
yeah like the Shots in that game SPUDNUT......Mhd 38.....Jags 10SPUDNUT wrote:Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?schwang17 wrote:SPUDNUT wrote:3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds
Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.
What a blowout!
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
Thats Mr. Potatohead to you!
after Centenial 3-4.-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....schwang17 wrote:That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
Thats Mr. Potatohead to you!
Let's stick to the season at hand oh bitter clang17! It is ok, we love you man.schwang17 wrote:That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
"can't we just all get along" (aka Rodney King, 1995)....
WOW - I wonder what is the bigger margin is: 6-1 or 9-1, somebody hand me a calculator ! Since these two started playing each other during regular season, Spuds lead 16-9. So your point is ?schwang17 wrote:That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
-
Potatohead9
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
-
biscuitbasket
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:58 pm
ANYWAYS........this was a fun game to watch tonight the Jags did about as good as i thought they would but moorhead is the 2nd ranked team in state and they won this game liked they should have. I liked watchin both the top lines of these two teams go at it but moorheads depth beat out jefferson's, Jefferson played a pretty good game and im guessing their gonna be one of those teams in sections that you really just dont wanna play but who knows it was fun to watch
Re: jags
My guess is that you're a wanna-be coach.baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional?
Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?
cuda701 wrote:It's easy to be a "sideline quarterback". Anyway, didn't the soph's score 4 out of 5 goals in the last game? The circumstances may vary on any given day and I myself will leave that decision to people that know better than I.
Are you referring the the "past" as in the Schwan's Cup?Potatohead9 wrote:I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....schwang17 wrote:That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
You used to make sense as I remember last year...A little frustrated by your blowout? Good Job, Jags!
Last edited by cuda701 on Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.