What will the Final Standings be for JGA?
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
What will the Final Standings be for JGA?
I think the standings will be as follows going into regions:
1. EP
2. Edina
3. WBL
4. Wayzata
5. Champlin
6. Osseo
7. Jefferson
8. Wessey
9. B'ville
10. Tonka
11. Stillwater
12. Moundsview
13. Centennial
14. Roseville
15. Eagan
1. EP
2. Edina
3. WBL
4. Wayzata
5. Champlin
6. Osseo
7. Jefferson
8. Wessey
9. B'ville
10. Tonka
11. Stillwater
12. Moundsview
13. Centennial
14. Roseville
15. Eagan
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 am
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
Fair play points really screw up the standings. Jr. Gold has done a lot of things in recent years to make this a better league, but fair play points is one of the worst things implemented. Instead of the final standings being determined by wins, they are determined by fair play points. Eden Prairie is a good team, but should not be #1 going into playoffs. Minnetonka is not a #10 team either. IT SCREWS UP REGIONS! Now a team that earned a high seed may end up playing Tonka, or Wessy when they should be playing a crap team.
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:50 pm
Fair play points are huge in this league. I agree it may screw the standings up a little but it also reflects the better teams. The teams that can control themselves and not play cheap, like EP, will win the district. This is what the "new" style of play is trying to teach. No more big guys dominating the ice. Let the teams with skill win. Not the team that just plays cheap as gas back in day. Let the fair play help the team that respects the new rules. Now EP may not play the best but they play a controlled style. The fair play reflects that. It's no fun watching a game full of penalties. I'd rather watch a game of crisp passing with heart to win vs a game of two teams more focused on killing each other and not caring about winning.
Iraqnam
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 am
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 am
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:10 am
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 am
Here is the tiebreaker list in order. This is from the Minnesota Hockey rule book.
5. In the event of a tie by one or more teams in the season final standings, the following tie breaking formulas shall be used in succession until one formula determines the position of ALL tied teams.
a. Head to head competition among tied teams including Fair Play points.
b. Most wins in league play.
c. Fewest losses in league play
d. Most Fair Play points earned in league play
e. Largest goal differential among tied teams. (six max. per game)
f. Greatest quotient; goals for divided by goals against among tied teams.
g. Largest goal differential for all league play. (six max. per game)
h. Greatest quotient; goals for divided by goals against for all league play.
i. Flip of a coin by a league official in the presence of the District Director.
5. In the event of a tie by one or more teams in the season final standings, the following tie breaking formulas shall be used in succession until one formula determines the position of ALL tied teams.
a. Head to head competition among tied teams including Fair Play points.
b. Most wins in league play.
c. Fewest losses in league play
d. Most Fair Play points earned in league play
e. Largest goal differential among tied teams. (six max. per game)
f. Greatest quotient; goals for divided by goals against among tied teams.
g. Largest goal differential for all league play. (six max. per game)
h. Greatest quotient; goals for divided by goals against for all league play.
i. Flip of a coin by a league official in the presence of the District Director.
Last edited by UNDlars on Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:08 am
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:21 pm
If you are not good enough to beat Tonka, Wessy's, or any solid team, it does not matter if you play a "crap" team first round and beat them, you will have to get through a great team if you want to go anywhere. So if you earned a high seed and deserve to be there, prove your point, play tonka/wessy's and beat them.puckhead77 wrote:Fair play points really screw up the standings. Jr. Gold has done a lot of things in recent years to make this a better league, but fair play points is one of the worst things implemented. Instead of the final standings being determined by wins, they are determined by fair play points. Eden Prairie is a good team, but should not be #1 going into playoffs. Minnetonka is not a #10 team either. IT SCREWS UP REGIONS! Now a team that earned a high seed may end up playing Tonka, or Wessy when they should be playing a crap team.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
You're absolutely right. My point was that if your team earned a high seed, your reward is playing a low seed. It is really not fair to teams like Tonka and Wessy who are good teams with good records, but get a low seed because of fair play points. But with all that being said your going to have to beat the best to be the best.
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:50 pm
First off, Tonka is no good. As for what I said about the fair play point thing up further, they are a prime example of a team that doesn't deserve a higher seed because of fair play. I heard they got into a bench clearing browl with Edina. When they played EP 3 or 4 players were ejected and atleast one of them just threw out the "F-bomb You" to the ref after he was ejected. Tonka is no good. Just cheap. Fair play is a good thing. If a team was truely good, they would do it without being cheap.
Iraqnam
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:21 pm
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:50 pm
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:33 am