Section 3AA semifinals (2-27) White Bear vs Roseville

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Section 3AA semifinals (2-27) White Bear vs Roseville

Poll ended at Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:47 am

White Bear
21
53%
Roseville
19
48%
 
Total votes: 40

wbmd
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Section 3AA semifinals (2-27) White Bear vs Roseville

Post by wbmd »

It will be the third meeting of the season between the Bears (16-10) and the Raiders (22-3-1). Roseville defeated White Bear previously 4-3 and 5-4, both times stopping a Bears' rally.

How's this one going to finish?
Last edited by wbmd on Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

I hope the Bears only have to beat the Raiders this time. Let em play!
Southpaw20
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:31 am

Post by Southpaw20 »

This game should be another amazing game between the two rivals. I hope WB comes ready to play because if they do they can and will pull off the upset. It is hard for a team to beat another good team 3 times in the same year and I dont see it happening this time. WB 4 Roseville 3 in another thrilling 3AA game.
HOCKEY SCOUT
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:41 pm

rsvl-wb

Post by HOCKEY SCOUT »

Roseville should win this game. Goaltending issues and lack of depth will hurt wb. Rsvl has to much up front and decent defense. Wb needs to start like they did against Roseville last time and not take penalties to win. If roseville gets 4 or more power plays this game will be over.
DAbears25
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:10 pm

Post by DAbears25 »

White Bear wont start out slow this time and will take it to the Raiders, but the score will still be close, WB 4-3.
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

SEC Scotty wrote:I hope the Bears only have to beat the Raiders this time. Let em play!
This statement is just the latest in the season long, constant referee bashing done by White Bear Lake fans. I guess they just don't get it – Roseville is the better team as exemplified by the two prior match ups.

Want some

Image

with your

Image

?????
Last edited by who_b_dat on Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
boblee
Posts: 9146
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

Post by boblee »

White Bear Lake will finally get the Raiders when it matters....

White Bear Lake 5
Roseville 4
HOCKEY SCOUT
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:41 pm

roseville-wb

Post by HOCKEY SCOUT »

I watched the last roseville-wb match and the reffing was not very good. I have no stake in who wins or loses but It was very 1 sided last game. I believe the powerplays were 9 for roseville and 1 or 2 for wb. Anybody would take that if your a roseville fan and hate it if your a wb fan. It will be a big game and hopefully the ref's don't try and steal the show. W.b. probably deserved 6 of those calls but roseville does do a little diving and that influenced some of the calls. I saw a ref make a call on a play he had his back to, makes you wonder.

I still say roseville is the deeper better team and should win. But I have seen wb play above their talent grade quite a few times this year and that is what makes playoff hockey so much fun for all of us.
WBLM
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:27 pm

Re: roseville-wb

Post by WBLM »

HOCKEY SCOUT wrote:I watched the last roseville-wb match and the reffing was not very good. I have no stake in who wins or loses but It was very 1 sided last game. I believe the powerplays were 9 for roseville and 1 or 2 for wb. Anybody would take that if your a roseville fan and hate it if your a wb fan. It will be a big game and hopefully the ref's don't try and steal the show. W.b. probably deserved 6 of those calls but roseville does do a little diving and that influenced some of the calls. I saw a ref make a call on a play he had his back to, makes you wonder.

I still say roseville is the deeper better team and should win. But I have seen wb play above their talent grade quite a few times this year and that is what makes playoff hockey so much fun for all of us.
Actually the power plays were 1 for WBL and 10+ for rose.
OB1
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:34 am

Post by OB1 »

Is it possible that WB has taken the penalties that they have because of their undisciplined play? Ohh- and by the way, when you come out flat (like WB has in the past two tilts) and your playing a FAST team, you are much more likely to be called for hook, trip, and interference. I’ve seen both games and I think if anything the refs could have called even more penalties on DuhBears.

Roseville by two.
Goalie35
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:38 am

Post by Goalie35 »

Who is the normal Roseville goalie?
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

White Bear 3-2
wbmd
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Goalie35 wrote:Who is the normal Roseville goalie?
I thought they rotated their goalies on a regular basis.
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Goalie35 wrote:Who is the normal Roseville goalie?
Is any goalie truly "normal"?
wbmd
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Neutron 14 wrote:Is any goalie truly "normal"?
DEFINITELY NOT
pokechecker
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:30 pm

Post by pokechecker »

OB1 wrote:Is it possible that WB has taken the penalties that they have because of their undisciplined play? Ohh- and by the way, when you come out flat (like WB has in the past two tilts) and your playing a FAST team, you are much more likely to be called for hook, trip, and interference. I’ve seen both games and I think if anything the refs could have called even more penalties on DuhBears.

Roseville by two.
AMEN! I was going to say the same thing. When you cross check someone in the back of the head or high stick someone in the throat you are going to get called 99% of the time. In the last RV/WBL game I don't recall many "weak" calls. I don't think Johnson should have received a 10 and 2 for his hit but, once again, that hit will get called for at least a cross check or charge 9 out of 10 times. There were many undisciplined plays on White Bear's behalf and that's why they were in the box so many more times that Roseville.
With that being said, I hope for a cleaner game tomorrow night so there aren't any excuses come Wednesday.

I look for Roseville to get the early lead again but hold onto it with a little more authority this time.

Raiders - 6
Bears - 3
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

pokechecker wrote:
OB1 wrote:Is it possible that WB has taken the penalties that they have because of their undisciplined play? Ohh- and by the way, when you come out flat (like WB has in the past two tilts) and your playing a FAST team, you are much more likely to be called for hook, trip, and interference. I’ve seen both games and I think if anything the refs could have called even more penalties on DuhBears.

Roseville by two.
AMEN! I was going to say the same thing. When you cross check someone in the back of the head or high stick someone in the throat you are going to get called 99% of the time. In the last RV/WBL game I don't recall many "weak" calls. I don't think Johnson should have received a 10 and 2 for his hit but, once again, that hit will get called for at least a cross check or charge 9 out of 10 times. There were many undisciplined plays on White Bear's behalf and that's why they were in the box so many more times that Roseville.
With that being said, I hope for a cleaner game tomorrow night so there aren't any excuses come Wednesday.

I look for Roseville to get the early lead again but hold onto it with a little more authority this time.

Raiders - 6
Bears - 3
You guys should get a room. Funny stuff. How do the Raiders get their helmets on over their halos? Maybe you got a tip or two from Lechner over at Hill.
pokechecker
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:30 pm

Post by pokechecker »

SEC Scotty wrote:You guys should get a room. Funny stuff. How do the Raiders get their helmets on over their halos? Maybe you got a tip or two from Lechner over at Hill.
At least 8 or 9 of the penalties White Bear got in the last Roseville game were deserved. So there should have been a definite edge in powerplays.
You have your views along with WBLM and I have mine. I'm not calling the Raiders angels but they kept their cool and won the game.
You lost me on the Lechner comment, sorry.
WBJG-4-life
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 am

Post by WBJG-4-life »

If WB comes out flat against Roseville they will most definatley lose again.

If WB comes out flying they will need to put the puck in the net for a chance to win and not rely on defense or goaltending where they are weaker.

This definatley will be a game where the hardest working team wins with a lot of scoring.

Should be a fun won to watch.
WB-5 (OT)
Roseville-4
WBJG-A-4-Life
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

pokechecker wrote: ... I hope for a cleaner game tomorrow night so there aren't any excuses come Wednesday.
We can always hope but the fans of the orange and black have been consistant all year so I'm not going to hold my breath.

Go Raiders!
Bearhockey13
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:06 pm

Post by Bearhockey13 »

OB1 wrote:Is it possible that WB has taken the penalties that they have because of their undisciplined play? Ohh- and by the way, when you come out flat (like WB has in the past two tilts) and your playing a FAST team, you are much more likely to be called for hook, trip, and interference. I’ve seen both games and I think if anything the refs could have called even more penalties on DuhBears.

Roseville by two.
I agree WB came out flat the last 2 games and if they do it again they will get beat. However, the Bears came out flying the last match, until they called a penalty on Hanson for holding, when Hanson was in front of RV's defender "Bad call", it's pretty tough to hold a guy that is behind you, in a full stride. Not to mention Johnson 2 and 10 was a joke. Why? I agree a roughing or maybe a charge, but it was not a check from behind. I agree on a 2 but the 10 was uncalled for. Not to say the Bears didn't deserve some penalties, but so did RV and they were left uncalled. I try not to blame refs for any game result, and I don't blame them for this out come. However, I do believe that if the game was called more fairly, WB wouldn't have had to score 3 SH goals to stay in the game. 5 on 5 WB stayed with RV, unfortunately there was not much opportunity for 5 on 5 play.
guitarer1c
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:20 am

Post by guitarer1c »

I agree with your sentiment. It's just not fun to watch when the official unnecessarily control the flow of the game. Hopefully, tonight will be different.
ovech_7
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:44 am

Post by ovech_7 »

How can you say it was WB's fault---the refs were BRUTAL.
How does Hansen get called for holding?
How does Johnson get a check from behind?
How does Fiala get a penalty when he stops out front of the Roseville net after the play was over, mobbed by 3 Roseville players, and then get taken to the box with no Roseville players with him?

The Bears scored 2 short handed goals, along with a penalty shot that was givin when Hartmann was taken down shorthanded on a breakaway. The 4th goal came when the play was 5 on 5 with the Bears having an empty net.

It's ridiculous.
Let em play 5 on 5 and Dorr is no matchup for Hansen.

I say 5-4 Bears in O.T.


SHUT THE DORR.
Bearhockey13
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:06 pm

Post by Bearhockey13 »

ovech_7 wrote:How can you say it was WB's fault---the refs were BRUTAL.
How does Hansen get called for holding?
How does Johnson get a check from behind?
How does Fiala get a penalty when he stops out front of the Roseville net after the play was over, mobbed by 3 Roseville players, and then get taken to the box with no Roseville players with him?

The Bears scored 2 short handed goals, along with a penalty shot that was givin when Hartmann was taken down shorthanded on a breakaway. The 4th goal came when the play was 5 on 5 with the Bears having an empty net.

It's ridiculous.
Let em play 5 on 5 and Dorr is no matchup for Hansen.

I say 5-4 Bears in O.T.


SHUT THE DORR.
What post are you referring to?
radiderpuck
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:51 pm

raiders ill rule this pupppy

Post by radiderpuck »

ook the replay is set for tomrow at 7:00 right here http://www.isd623.org/623-cable/streaming.cfm but hey is itll liek rosevillle raiders! goooo doorrr! chanell 18 for those lvie in the rahs area!
Post Reply