Red Wing @ St Thomas 3-1-07 3A Final
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Red Wing @ St Thomas 3-1-07 3A Final
These two teams met earlier in the season and it was a close one said to be a bad game for both teams ending in a 2-1 W for the Cadets. The Cadets have 0 GA thus far in sections and they'd love to keep that up for their hopeful trip to state, while I'm sure the whole state outside of Mendota Heights would love to see the Wingers upset the private school and advance to state.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:58 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:00 pm
Did RW get outplayed and sneek into this game? Or were they more talented than Lourdes in the 3-2 win?
I believe momentum is a huge key to a teams sucess come playoffs, so the answers to these questions could say a lot about what will happen come D-day.
On a side note, that had to be a bitter loss for the Eagles tonight since this is the last year they will be in Section 3A.
I believe momentum is a huge key to a teams sucess come playoffs, so the answers to these questions could say a lot about what will happen come D-day.
On a side note, that had to be a bitter loss for the Eagles tonight since this is the last year they will be in Section 3A.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:58 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:58 pm
So a player for Lourdes said about the team that they tied this season and lost to in sections last year said RW wouldn't be a challenge?LPfan0116 wrote:Well no PLEASE BAN ME that they scored more. Bce i talked to a lourdes player last night at the mayo/century game and they said red wing wasnt going to be that bug of a challenge but i guess thats what u get when u'r cocky.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:36 am
- Location: Andy's Bar
Red Wing got severely outplayed in the first, but they hung around and eventually wore out lourdes. both teams were completely gassed at the end of the game. but if momentum you say has a huge role in playoffs I can't see how the wingers could possibly get any more momentum out of a game. They were really jacked up to win.RGGspartan10 wrote:Did RW get outplayed and sneek into this game? Or were they more talented than Lourdes in the 3-2 win?
I believe momentum is a huge key to a teams sucess come playoffs, so the answers to these questions could say a lot about what will happen come D-day.
On a side note, that had to be a bitter loss for the Eagles tonight since this is the last year they will be in Section 3A.
Just Livin the Dream
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:36 am
- Location: Andy's Bar
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:18 pm
sniper1675 wrote:
Red Wing got severely outplayed in the first, but they hung around and eventually wore out lourdes. both teams were completely gassed at the end of the game. but if momentum you say has a huge role in playoffs I can't see how the wingers could possibly get any more momentum out of a game. They were really jacked up to win.
Couldnt have said it better myself. RW got totally handled in the first. The only Winger that showed up to play the first was Droogsma. But whatever Nem said must have kickstarted something. They wore the Eagles down, and the goals came.
Oh, and RL #4.. what ya think now?! Thought so.
I think the final will be close.. probably too close for STA's comfort.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:32 am
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:45 am
This will be tough for Red Wing. STA was totally in control tonight, a hat trick for the Walter kid, and Richfield never seriously threatened.
Red Wing was lucky to only be down 1-0 after the 1st (although Lourdes' goal came after a missed offsides), and seemed to find their legs in the 2nd...1-1 after two periods, 2-1 Lourdes with about 10 minutes left, then the sophomore for Red Wing - I think it's Schammell - scored to tie, then got the winner with 2:50 left. Red Wing took a penalty with 2:15 to go and had to kill that off.
They were pretty even teams, and if LP is right and Lourdes was looking past this game, they were very mistaken.
Red Wing has been outshot in both their playoff games, total of 46-32, I think, but won 3-1 and 3-2.
Red Wing was lucky to only be down 1-0 after the 1st (although Lourdes' goal came after a missed offsides), and seemed to find their legs in the 2nd...1-1 after two periods, 2-1 Lourdes with about 10 minutes left, then the sophomore for Red Wing - I think it's Schammell - scored to tie, then got the winner with 2:50 left. Red Wing took a penalty with 2:15 to go and had to kill that off.
They were pretty even teams, and if LP is right and Lourdes was looking past this game, they were very mistaken.
Red Wing has been outshot in both their playoff games, total of 46-32, I think, but won 3-1 and 3-2.
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:18 pm
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:23 pm
Basically Lourdes players took some dumb penalties, shortened the game for RW (playing 5 on 4), didn't finish when they had the chance. RW's goalie played well and Shammel did the job when he had the chance. I thought RL was outcoached as well, given that RL was the more talented team. RL players like to hang on the puck instead of passing it. RL's goalie was not very strong either - gave up too many rebounds and scrambles around the net.LPfan0116 wrote:How in the hell did red wing beat lourdes?
STA looked ok in their win against Richfield, but they are definately not the same caliber as their team last year and are beatable.
This statement makes no sense. Of course if anyone is going to beat STA it will be RW. They are the only team left in Section 3A.....Man1ac2190 wrote:If anyone in 3A can do it, it is Red Wing. They seem to have STA's number...even though they always lose anyway.
I just read that the student section knocked the glass out of the supports during the game, that sucks. At our arena kids get so pissed off at us because we constantly pull kids from the glass. This is the reason why. Does anyone out there know how muxh one piece of glass costs, besides the time it will take to clean it up. If you have ever been at Richfield, you know that the stands are about 3 and a half feet above the ice. If this were to happen at Richfield, not only would the glass break and fall on the ice but the kids hanging will fall on the ice also. The someone gets hurt and the lawsuits start. My advice is this, STAY OFF THE GLASS!!! DON'T GET PISSED AT THE ARENA PEOPLE WHEN THEY REMOVE YOU.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:52 am
I agree with you. They are better....... Every team is beatable. Your insight is flawed without facts explaining why they are less a team.puckjazz2 wrote:Basically Lourdes players took some dumb penalties, shortened the game for RW (playing 5 on 4), didn't finish when they had the chance. RW's goalie played well and Shammel did the job when he had the chance. I thought RL was outcoached as well, given that RL was the more talented team. RL players like to hang on the puck instead of passing it. RL's goalie was not very strong either - gave up too many rebounds and scrambles around the net.LPfan0116 wrote:How in the hell did red wing beat lourdes?
STA looked ok in their win against Richfield, but they are definately not the same caliber as their team last year and are beatable.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Very good advice. It's so true. People trying to enforce things are a-holes until you do something stupid then your response is "well, why didn't someone pull me off the glass?!"
Just curious. You see at plenty of games at the X, and probably other venues, people pushing up against the glass from both sides after goals and wins and this kind of a thing never (usually) happens. What does it take to break on of those?
Just curious. You see at plenty of games at the X, and probably other venues, people pushing up against the glass from both sides after goals and wins and this kind of a thing never (usually) happens. What does it take to break on of those?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:27 pm
[quote="ocanadaourhome"][quote="puckjazz2"][quote="LPfan0116"]How in the hell did red wing beat lourdes?[/quote]
Basically Lourdes players took some dumb penalties, shortened the game for RW (playing 5 on 4), didn't finish when they had the chance. RW's goalie played well and Shammel did the job when he had the chance. I thought RL was outcoached as well, given that RL was the more talented team. RL players like to hang on the puck instead of passing it. RL's goalie was not very strong either - gave up too many rebounds and scrambles around the net.
STA looked ok in their win against Richfield, but they are definately not the same caliber as their team last year and are beatable.[/quote]
I agree with you. [i]They are better....... [/i][b][/b] Every team is beatable. Your insight is flawed without facts explaining why they are less a team.[/quote]
It was just a bad game in general. lourdes shouldve won easily. They had an important player sick, and there first line wasnt working well at all.
Basically Lourdes players took some dumb penalties, shortened the game for RW (playing 5 on 4), didn't finish when they had the chance. RW's goalie played well and Shammel did the job when he had the chance. I thought RL was outcoached as well, given that RL was the more talented team. RL players like to hang on the puck instead of passing it. RL's goalie was not very strong either - gave up too many rebounds and scrambles around the net.
STA looked ok in their win against Richfield, but they are definately not the same caliber as their team last year and are beatable.[/quote]
I agree with you. [i]They are better....... [/i][b][/b] Every team is beatable. Your insight is flawed without facts explaining why they are less a team.[/quote]
It was just a bad game in general. lourdes shouldve won easily. They had an important player sick, and there first line wasnt working well at all.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 am
How was the first goal due to a missed offsides? It sure looked on/good to me. I agree that Redwing seriously got outplayed in the first half of the game and it was kind of sloppy throughout most. I do think that if Redwing can hold on close to Saint Thomas for two periods like Richfield did, anything can happen.goalieguy1 wrote: Red Wing was lucky to only be down 1-0 after the 1st (although Lourdes' goal came after a missed offsides)