
District 8 Playoffs
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:55 pm
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:24 pm
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:08 pm
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:08 pm
youngblood52 wrote:
Did Mommy and Daddy give you that comeback like they give you everything else Sotahockey??
yeahhh alright?? we are sooo rich you know
that was probably the worst comeback i have ever heard
dont take it out on me im just sayin you guys have no class so i wouldnt be talkin
totally agree with you sotahock14
Did Mommy and Daddy give you that comeback like they give you everything else Sotahockey??
yeahhh alright?? we are sooo rich you know
that was probably the worst comeback i have ever heard
dont take it out on me im just sayin you guys have no class so i wouldnt be talkin
totally agree with you sotahock14
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
And you showed so much Class when you went through the line at the end of a 2-1 game, saying " You guys are a bunch of F****** hacks." 3 games with CG and I believe all 1 goal games, physical and fast paced. Too bad guys like you are able to talk.SotaH0ck14 wrote:ha yeah you are from Cottage Grove what do you guys know about class?
Nice job Danny Muck #14 Eagan. Truely classy.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:24 pm
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
dude i dont even play for eagan bantam A i just watch their games i played for them last yearPucknutz69 wrote:And you showed so much Class when you went through the line at the end of a 2-1 game, saying " You guys are a bunch of F****** hacks." 3 games with CG and I believe all 1 goal games, physical and fast paced. Too bad guys like you are able to talk.SotaH0ck14 wrote:ha yeah you are from Cottage Grove what do you guys know about class?
Nice job Danny Muck #14 Eagan. Truely classy.
im not danny muck dude get that through your head ask your buddy youngblood
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:15 pm
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
Making it right.
I called a player out (#14 Dan Muck, Eagan) on this post for his comments after a playoff game. He has PM'd me and apologized for those comments that he made to CG players after the game with Eagan. just wanted to clear it up on my end. Good Luck in Regions boys.
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
let me guess you play for Lakeville South??i heart atum peetersun wrote:eagan dosnt really deserve to go to regions. They got really lucky that woodbury didnt crush them. Must have been a great game by bock, but they really dont deserve it. As for the class thing goes CG has more class than Eagan but thats all i will say on that topic.
haha lucky in the game yeah right
they completely dominated the whole game (regulation but overtime was back and forth) besides the last 2 mins when there was a 6-4 advantage in favor of Woodbury a team should score when they have a 2 man advantage am i correct??
the 8-3 was a fluke from what i watched
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:08 pm
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:15 pm
You say that eagan completly dominated when they were outshot 85-25? wow you have some low standards. Its nice that woodburys goalies suck because otherwise theyd be goin to regions.SotaH0ck14 wrote:let me guess you play for Lakeville South??i heart atum peetersun wrote:eagan dosnt really deserve to go to regions. They got really lucky that woodbury didnt crush them. Must have been a great game by bock, but they really dont deserve it. As for the class thing goes CG has more class than Eagan but thats all i will say on that topic.
haha lucky in the game yeah right
they completely dominated the whole game (regulation but overtime was back and forth) besides the last 2 mins when there was a 6-4 advantage in favor of Woodbury a team should score when they have a 2 man advantage am i correct??
the 8-3 was a fluke from what i watched
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
the shots dont say anything about the control of the game
Woodbury had 85 shots or whatever becasue they would get across the blueline and fire a slapshot well they play 9 periods so hmmm that would probably equal about 85 shots if you did that for 9 periods
dont get me wrong Woodbury played great they had scoring chances yes plenty but not as many scoring chances as Eagan did, instead they would just fire it from the blueline to get a shot and change
Woodbury had 85 shots or whatever becasue they would get across the blueline and fire a slapshot well they play 9 periods so hmmm that would probably equal about 85 shots if you did that for 9 periods
dont get me wrong Woodbury played great they had scoring chances yes plenty but not as many scoring chances as Eagan did, instead they would just fire it from the blueline to get a shot and change
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
I witnessed the woodbury- eagan game, yes woodbury took many long shots and yes woodbury took many shots from close in, I'm not associated with either program. The difference in this game was the GOALIE..period. The first 3 overtimes woodbury just crushed eagan and could not get it past the Eagan netminder. A great win for the blue and green and quite possibly the best bantam goal tending I've ever seen.
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 pm
thank youkeepyourheadup wrote:I witnessed the woodbury- eagan game, yes woodbury took many long shots and yes woodbury took many shots from close in, I'm not associated with either program. The difference in this game was the GOALIE..period. The first 3 overtimes woodbury just crushed eagan and could not get it past the Eagan netminder. A great win for the blue and green and quite possibly the best bantam goal tending I've ever seen.
finally somebody understands the game
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:12 pm
ok i watched the whole game too
shots 86-25
woodbury controlled the whole game. Im not saying that just because of the shots. eagan could barely get it out of woodburys zone. i can almost gaurantee that if woodbury played them 20 more times they wouldnt lose. they are a much better team then eagan in every area except maybe goaltending. But if a good goalie moves into town, i can almost be that Woodbury will be almost unstoppable in highschool
shots 86-25
woodbury controlled the whole game. Im not saying that just because of the shots. eagan could barely get it out of woodburys zone. i can almost gaurantee that if woodbury played them 20 more times they wouldnt lose. they are a much better team then eagan in every area except maybe goaltending. But if a good goalie moves into town, i can almost be that Woodbury will be almost unstoppable in highschool