While there have been no calls, they have went both ways. Who wouldn't want to see the better team win and not the one that got the better end of a weak penalty.
Much of the first OT looked to be DM v. Crandel. STA's offense was too busy backchecking and defending shots to get much of anything started. DM can beat STA but can they beat Crandel?
who_b_dat wrote:While there have been no calls, they have went both ways. Who wouldn't want to see the better team win and not the one that got the better end of a weak penalty.
If they were weak. Larsen and the DM player should have gone to the box for the roughing at the net.
Whats # 22 for DM's name. My god is he huge.... what in the world was he doing on the ice. He did get a huge piece of Cadet for lunch though. That may be play of the game! Cadet gets blow away!
who_b_dat wrote:While there have been no calls, they have went both ways. Who wouldn't want to see the better team win and not the one that got the better end of a weak penalty.
If they were weak. Larsen and the DM player should have gone to the box for the roughing at the net.
no, thats part of hockey, especially in an overtime game, let them play
who_b_dat wrote:While there have been no calls, they have went both ways. Who wouldn't want to see the better team win and not the one that got the better end of a weak penalty.
If they were weak. Larsen and the DM player should have gone to the box for the roughing at the net.
no, thats part of hockey, especially in an overtime game, let them play
Add #4 to that too...DM is losing the cheap shot attack big time.