Woodbury Vs Hill
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:47 pm
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:47 pm
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:23 pm
Why wouldn't two of Hills best players play in this game. Larsen played the whole game with his owy and couldn't pull this one off....??Basil Chaps wrote:I wasn't complaining that Woodbury won, but they could have been a little more original. I'm glad Woodbury was able to beat us with no Larson or Philippi and with 3rd or 4th line on the ice half the time.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:09 pm
Larson didnt play because why risk anything when he has a great future ahead of him? let him go play in the USHL when he is not injured anymore and then on to the gophers. why would lechner want him to risk his future with a consolation game. and philipi didnt play because lechner let the senior goaltender, who is the back up, play.
I agree it should be a fun year next year. The first line returns Furne and Zepeda, and the second line returns Cecka and Kohls. Assuming those pairs stay together (I realize that's not a given). Each line needs a third, and with Westerhaus, Widing and Singerhouse all craving the extra ice time not to mention Prescott, French and a couple of others I may have left out this should be a team to be reckoned with.
Hillfan wrote:Pioneerprideguy shows class and yet all you can do is still embarass yourself?
Well I think he will knowing that H-M returns 14 players which includes 108 goals scored this year, 4 of 6 defensemen, and a goaltender with 4 years of experience.Have a nice off season.
Oh, and by the way that wasn't even remotely funnyOh and by the way Mr. I'm Smarter Than Everyone Else Guy Because I Went to the Private School Hill Murray....


-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:15 pm
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:15 pm
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
honestly pretty much every team in the tournament uses the same cheers. and the kid who says our cheers r unoriginal, dont even try to tell me that hill murray invented those cheers cuz ive lived and gone to school in woodbury for 11 years now and weve been using most of the cheers (other than "sit down cecka!" of course) for as long as i can remember. but anyways good game by both teams whoever won that game it still woulda been one of the best in a while (but im glad woodbury did!) foogd luck next year to every1 i hate to say it but Hill is looking like a contender sor the state championship because they were so young this year. sections r all different next year tho so well see what happens.
you just arent seeing what im saying
we would yell pioneers eat em up
and then woodbury would do the EXACT cheer changing pioneers to royals. That is lacking originality, do it later, not right away. No need to be copycats
but who cares, the game is decided on the ice not in the stands
we would yell pioneers eat em up
and then woodbury would do the EXACT cheer changing pioneers to royals. That is lacking originality, do it later, not right away. No need to be copycats
but who cares, the game is decided on the ice not in the stands
State ‘83, ‘91, ‘08, ‘20
Why, they're in the "State of Hockey", of course .......
We were raised
With the stick
And a pair of blades
On the ice we cut our teeth
We took our knocks
In the penalty box
Our mother was the referee
This sport was here
Before we came
It will be here when we're gone
The game's in our blood
And our blood's in the game
Lay us down under
A frozen pond
We will fight to the end
We will stand and defend
Our flag flying high and free
We were born the child
Of the strong and wild
In the state the state
Of hockey
A big blue line runs around our state
A line that can't be crossed
The day they try to take this game
Is the day the gloves come off
We will fight to the end
We will stand and defend
Our flag flying high and free
We were born the child
Of the strong and wild
In the state the state
Of hockey.
We were raised
With the stick
And a pair of blades
On the ice we cut our teeth
We took our knocks
In the penalty box
Our mother was the referee
This sport was here
Before we came
It will be here when we're gone
The game's in our blood
And our blood's in the game
Lay us down under
A frozen pond
We will fight to the end
We will stand and defend
Our flag flying high and free
We were born the child
Of the strong and wild
In the state the state
Of hockey
A big blue line runs around our state
A line that can't be crossed
The day they try to take this game
Is the day the gloves come off
We will fight to the end
We will stand and defend
Our flag flying high and free
We were born the child
Of the strong and wild
In the state the state
Of hockey.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
to sachisi4 very good point game is decided on the ice but fans can have a lot to do with the outcome of the game. and we honestly could not tell what u guys were saying. we could hear u but just couldnt make out what u were saying so we just did whatever chant we wanted. and after sitting in the hill section for the centruy game and listening to u guys cheer, u ned some new ones. i think i only heard 2 diferent cheers the entire game.
Trashman-
I agree it should be a fun year next year. The first line returns Furne and Zepeda, and the second line returns Cecka and Kohls. Assuming those pairs stay together (I realize that's not a given). Each line needs a third, and with Westerhaus, Widing and Singerhouse all craving the extra ice time not to mention Prescott, French and a couple of others I may have left out this should be a team to be reckoned with
Cecka,kohls,and Westerhaus are 2nd line together and most likley start together next year based on their proformance this year. Alone in the past 5 games they combined for 21 points.
As for who will fill larsons spot at center on the first line is up for debate, in the game against woodbury they were 2nd line and had furne centering with zepeda and widing as the wings. widing is not a center but singerhouse is, should be an exciting team next as much as it was this year.
I agree it should be a fun year next year. The first line returns Furne and Zepeda, and the second line returns Cecka and Kohls. Assuming those pairs stay together (I realize that's not a given). Each line needs a third, and with Westerhaus, Widing and Singerhouse all craving the extra ice time not to mention Prescott, French and a couple of others I may have left out this should be a team to be reckoned with
Cecka,kohls,and Westerhaus are 2nd line together and most likley start together next year based on their proformance this year. Alone in the past 5 games they combined for 21 points.
As for who will fill larsons spot at center on the first line is up for debate, in the game against woodbury they were 2nd line and had furne centering with zepeda and widing as the wings. widing is not a center but singerhouse is, should be an exciting team next as much as it was this year.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:51 pm
Re: im gonna say woodbury is gonna win this one. hopefully t
Wdbysportsfan...what a joke. I have known the Zepeda family for some time and his father and mother tried to get their son to go to St. Thomas. If you know his father so well and his son went their to play hockey, why is he still coaching in Woodbury at the Bantam level and encourages the players to "stay home". Know your facts before you spout off...Wdbysportsfan wrote:Woodbury has been, and still is, a feeder system for Hill. I know Guentzel will attend Hill just as his brother did. Heck, Zepeda is a Woodbury kid who grew up playing through the Woodbury Hockey Association and is probably their top Soph. Knowing his father, my guess is it was the fathers idea to attend Hill solely for hockey.
Hopefully...sometime in the near future, these parents will let the kids decide where to attend school. I've known a few non-athletes who were offered the choice to continue their education at Woodbury or attend Hill. 98% stayed at Woodbury. On the other end of the spectrum, I know 1 or two athletes who left to Hill for the education.