Vikings in trouble for opening day?

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:18 pm

Govs93 wrote:
I've heard that admitting you have a problem is the first step toward recovery... I hope that's true.

www.circlewatcheranonomous.com

We're here for you. I hope intervention isn't neccessary. Deprograming can get ugly.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:20 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
I've heard that admitting you have a problem is the first step toward recovery... I hope that's true.
www.circlewatcheranonomous.com

We're here for you. I hope intervention isn't neccessary. Deprograming can get ugly.

Don't take it to hard at least he's not feeling ya

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:09 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote: Don't take it to hard at least he's not feeling ya

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:42 pm

Hey, I finally got my DSL back.

When you look at some of talent on this team, we should be pumped.
The O Line- The DEF- AP-etc.

The coaching staff just keeps bringing me back to reality.

I am still open to liking them- but they will have to earn it.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:14 am

Govs, you're still missing my point. You should stop running this in circles though. I'm not saying any more games should've been won or lost than were. In many sports games both teams do really poorly. The winner is the team who screws up the least. But when the refs screw up, people like you just say "well, we should've done something better somewhere else." Why? We did something better then.

Something tennis did very right, instant reply anytime. Same thing with challenges, except, wait...you can't do them anytime.

Bottom line, the Vikes weren't the horrible team you make them out to be. That's it.

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:05 am

Alright! whos pumped for Friday i cant wait to see how Childress has put together them team. even thou its preseason

EREmpireStrikesBack · Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:15 pm

I'll wait til Week 1 to see "how the team is put together". 3rd stringers and guys fighting for a roster spot don't epitomize the team in the least bit.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:35 pm

Hey, maybe we can get Russell and improve our passing game since Oakland doesn't seem to want him

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:37 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:Hey, maybe we can get Russell and improve our passing game since Oakland doesn't seem to want him

hah are you joking or for real they dont want him? im sure they wouldnt trade him thou

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:25 am

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:I'll wait til Week 1 to see "how the team is put together". 3rd stringers and guys fighting for a roster spot don't epitomize the team in the least bit.

well just first quarter or half

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:10 am

Just been watching ESPN a bit. He's the #1 pick and he's one of 2 first round picks not signed yet. In addition, many on ESPN say that if he does get signed he probably won't play much this year.

Yes, I was joking, but it would improve our passing game immensely.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:28 am

I heard that AP won't be playing this Friday

hope this guy doesn't turn out to be a Mr. Salty.
I was looking fwd. to watching him play.

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:59 am

is it his hip or shoulder?

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:34 am

Hip pointer.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:28 pm

Well is it going to be worth watching

I guess I will probably take a peak at the start...this has the feel that the starters all ready played and we're jumping right to the 2nd 1/2 players

I sure hope they suprise me.

pacman · Post by **pacman** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:50 pm

Well guys ill sum it up this way, Thank God Football is hear!

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:52 pm

pacman wrote:Well guys ill sum it up this way, Thank God Football is hear!

Couldn't even say it right...

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:47 pm

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
pacman wrote:Well guys ill sum it up this way, Thank God Football is hear!

Couldn't even say it right...

ER It was ripe for the pickin alright... but I left it on the vine..I knew you wouldn't pass it up though

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:06 pm

I can't wait to sea them either.

EREmpireStrikesBack · Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:31 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
pacman wrote:Well guys ill sum it up this way, Thank God Football is hear!

Couldn't even say it right...

ER It was ripe for the pickin alright... but I left it on the vine..I knew you wouldn't pass it up though

You know I'll always hit the hanging curve. I'm not picky.

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:51 am

Do any of you have comcast here? if you do did you get the nfl network taken off? i was going to watch the hall of fame game and it didnt work i thought that was kinda lame.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:40 am

dangla. wrote:Do any of you have comcast here? if you do did you get the nfl network taken off? i was going to watch the hall of fame game and it didnt work i thought that was kinda lame.

Here Is the NFL's explanation of why Comcast customers don't have the NFL Network... it's actually funny to read - I think the NFL is a little pissed at them!

I have Directv, so whatever...

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:49 am

Being I'm out of town have they said whether or not AP will play in this next pre-season game against the Jets?
I didn't see him on the list of injuries..although there were 6 players probable and 1 questionable...including T Jackson.

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:27 pm

So I was reading SI and there was some article on the RB's just a projected % on how they would split it. It said that the vikes would split it
45%-Taylor
45%-Peterson
10%-Moore

I think that's about right if Peterson stays healthy all year if not i think.

80%-Taylor
15%-Moore
5%-Peterson

that if hes not healthy

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:15 pm

I didn't see it, but on paper looks like an impressive win over the Jets, with Peterson doin' his thing, interception for a TD, good receiving yards. Promising if people stay healthy.