Since the late 1990's, Buffalo has made at least four attempts to move out of District 5, but to no avail. The reasons have more to do with competitive balance and high school placement, rather than geography and travel. I do not doubt that those would be important to some of the members, but not the majority.
As seen in the eyes of the MSHSL, and due to its rapid ascent in enrollment growth, Buffalo has been kind of a nomad in high school hockey . . . AA to A to AA, Section 6 to Section 8, North Suburban to M8 with a home/away with the Classic Lake, to now a home/away with the M8.
The basic premise underlying all four (or five) requests was the desire to compete at the same level of competition that the high school program was at. If youth hockey is truly a feeder program, does it make sense to develop by playing Litchfield, Willmar, and Hutchinson, and then have to face Roseau, Moorhead, Brainerd, when you get to the high school level?
The desire was to maximize the opportunity on the schedule to play Edina, Wayzata, Armstrong, Elk River, Maple Grove, Grand Rapids, Duluth, etc., as those are the teams that are the competition in high school. It is the opinion of some, that it is better to get beat while pushing your limits, then beating up on someone and coasting for half the game.
In 1998 and 2001, the issue never made it past DD Sweezo. In 2003, a push was made to get the issue in front of the redistricting committee, and support was sought from D3 to join their District. Buffalo was asked to hold off as state-wide redistricting was on the table, and there was going to be a moratorium on all movement until then. After waiting two years, it was apparent that all administrative movement had swung to HEP, and nothing was in the works . . . oops, there goes Orono sliding into District 3, so much for a moratorium.
With no feedback, it was decided that it was time to press a little harder, offer to play an independent schedule, or 4 point games, so that we can free schedule space for potential AA opponents. But its been one stonewall after another.
It should be noted that
Minnesota Hockey is a representative body, and that you should be able to submit requests for changes and advances to them without being branded a renegade. And, you should be able to anticipate a fair and measured response. In 1998 and 2001, Buffalo received that. In 2003 it did not.
I don't think the majority in Buffalo have anything against District 5, nor the Mississippi 8, its just not where we would choose to develop the program. We believe we have more in common with AA schools, rather than A schools in our vicinity, and have spent 30+ years trying to build a program to compete at that level. Even given the fluctuation is talent, and it will always ebb and flow, Buffalo is consistently top 2 or 3 in every classification in District 5, and will likely be so in the M8, for years to come. But that is not satisfying when it comes to building a program.
In the 1980's and early 1990's Buffalo and District 5 were a perfect fit on all counts. The growth of the school district and the hockey program have severly restricted that fit, and the gap will only continue to get bigger. I really hope that there is enough foresight for people to understand that "we've always done it that way" isn't good enough to justify continuing down the same path. If it was, we wouldn't have HEP.
I would like a t-shirt, also. . . and a book