jancze5 wrote:
I don't hide behind any BS name on here.
Please tell me your parents didn't name you jancze5. Teachers must have had a heck of a time pronouncing that.

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
jancze5 wrote:
I don't hide behind any BS name on here.
I respect the fact that not all DD's operate the same and your history with that.54fighting wrote:Elliott-
I do not mean this to be an attack on you personally. I respect your willingness to get on this board and ask for opinions and solutions from the masses.
That being said I do not believe that all districts are run in the same manor as yours appears to be. Maybe that is why there always seems to be the number of great players that come out of the north in relation to the overall numbers.
In this particular district I know of a number of people who have asked the DD to look into a situation and the response has always been " I don't get involved in association buisness". Then if it is brought beyond the DD up the chain the response has been " Sorry we allow the districts to set there own rules and policys". Where is the accountability up the ladder?
I now longer have children playing in the youth hockey system but that was the one thing that always burned me. It seemed that the DD could do or say whatever he wanted and there was no accountability.
Anyway, just my two cents on why programs like the Fire and the AAA programs in the summer seem to be getting more and more popular.
* emphasis provided by elliott70jancze5 wrote:
Or is it, why is there a need for an "elite bantam" underground* schedule? Is it because 90% of the teams in the state stink and don't provide competition for 70% of the schedule??
Good response.just the facts wrote:I think we all need to go back to the original question, "How did it get so bad?"
1) How about we look at player development? Go to a practice and see what they do in practice. Ask yourself some questions:
a) Do the drills have a lot of tempo?
b) Are drills appropriate to the level you are watching?
c) Does the coach seem to be engaged?
d) Does the coach skate with the kids?
e) Does the coach work with each kid individually?
f) Do the kids seem to be engaged?
g) Does it look like practice is fun?
h) Is the goalie getting work from a coach?
I) After practice look at their faces are they excited?
If you answered no to these questions than wouldn’t that be a reason to leave?
jancze5 wrote:furthermore...
There is no right or wrong here when it comes to hockey. You can argue both sides of the fence for/against assocation or AAA. But you will rarely get a fair comparison because they are 2 different evils.
Just be willing to ante up while speaking your humble opinion.
jancze5 wrote:Breakout,
when you're ready to tell us your Mite D experience
Yes, Centennial does still have a D team and after a D10 meeting in August in which it was discussed, they decided to keep that level. If I remember correctly, when they voted on it, there were only 2 associations against the D level. Hence, the decision to keep it around for the 07-08 year.spin-o-rama wrote:I thought D10 did away with the D level, but Centennial still has it on their website.
jancze5 wrote:Breakout..
WIth anticipation I came on here this morning hoping that you have finally jumped on the oppurtunity to state your actual affiliations, to the dissapointment of many, you have yet to man-up and profess.
What's up?
I see you continued to make smart one liners, is that all you're good for?
That's right Stu you tell himelliott70 wrote: This forum is designed for anonymous input.
Some of us choose to be known.
You are out of line by trying to get breakout to disclose his real identity.
And as he asked you, is Jancze your name?
(Don't answer)
Can't Never Tried wrote:That's right Stu you tell himelliott70 wrote: This forum is designed for anonymous input.
Some of us choose to be known.
You are out of line by trying to get breakout to disclose his real identity.
And as he asked you, is Jancze your name?
(Don't answer)
I think you got the jist of the sarcasam....and I agree with your post...But how do we really know your Mark???elliott70 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:That's right Stu you tell himelliott70 wrote: This forum is designed for anonymous input.
Some of us choose to be known.
You are out of line by trying to get breakout to disclose his real identity.
And as he asked you, is Jancze your name?
(Don't answer)
I coached a Stu once.
I ate stew (more than once).
I have stewed over things a time or two.
But MARK my words, I am not named Stu.
Can't Never Tried wrote:I think you got the jist of the sarcasam....and I agree with your post...But how do we really know your Mark???elliott70 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote: That's right Stu you tell him
I coached a Stu once.
I ate stew (more than once).
I have stewed over things a time or two.
But MARK my words, I am not named Stu.
There all to hardelliott70 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:I think you got the jist of the sarcasam....and I agree with your post...But how do we really know your Mark???elliott70 wrote:
I coached a Stu once.
I ate stew (more than once).
I have stewed over things a time or two.
But MARK my words, I am not named Stu.
Ask me a question only I could answer?????
jancze5 wrote:Breakout..
WIth anticipation I came on here this morning hoping that you have finally jumped on the oppurtunity to state your actual affiliations, to the dissapointment of many, you have yet to man-up and profess