Central Scouting List

stickboy1956 · Post by **stickboy1956** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:38 pm

Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Gleason is a UND recruit.

Gopher Blog · Post by **Gopher Blog** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:50 pm

stickboy1956 wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.
Gleason is a UND recruit.

Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).

breakout · Post by **breakout** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:10 pm

Gopher Blog wrote:
stickboy1956 wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.
Gleason is a UND recruit.
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).

GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that many of those players, even on the "A" list are not complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.

Hockey=Life · Post by **Hockey=Life** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:16 pm

I see the local list from you gopher, but does anyone know the website for the whole list? If so, thanks.

sjubum · Post by **sjubum** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:29 pm

Hockey=Life wrote:I see the local list from you gopher, but does anyone know the website for the whole list? If so, thanks.

Direct link:
http://centralscouting.nhl.com/CSMenu.n ... enDocument

Get the PDF.

hockeyeast223 · Post by **hockeyeast223** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:55 pm

can anyone explain what the column with the * indicates? I notice many of the high school players have them.

Observer85 · Post by **Observer85** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:11 pm

hockeyeast223 wrote:can anyone explain what the column with the * indicates? I notice many of the high school players have them.

If a player has a (*) by his name it means that his height and weight were actually taken by a representative from CSS. Otherwise the figures are from what the player has put on a form or what his team has used in the past.

stickboy1956 · Post by **stickboy1956** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:44 pm

breakout wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:
stickboy1956 wrote: Gleason is a UND recruit.
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that many of those players, even on the "A" list are not complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.

Which A player do you think is overrated?

breakout · Post by **breakout** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:50 am

stickboy1956 wrote:
breakout wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote: Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that some of those players, even on the "A" list may be less than complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.
Which A player do you think is overrated?

Just speculating that some of the players listed as A, B and C may be less than complete players. The NHL must see some upside (potential).

Offside · Post by **Offside** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:44 am

being on the list is more about their potential, how the NHL CSS sees then in the next three to five years or more. so yes, some are not COMPLETE players but they all are very good, some with more potential than others. Usually, the A players are drafted however. I said usually.

hockeyeast223 · Post by **hockeyeast223** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:25 am

How significant is this list? Is it used only by NHL CS or do college coaches use it to guide recruiting?

hockey nut · Post by **hockey nut** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:44 am

I would say ay this point that there are no overrated "A" players. These kids have been watched for a long time by alot of NHL scouts to recieve this tag. I would say that they all should be very proud to be listed, but the work has just begun for most of them. Congrats to all the kids on the list.

UMDHockey · Post by **UMDHockey** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:17 am

Anyone have any information on Anders Lee being reported as a bulldog recruit on this page? We haven't heard anything about it but the scouting report says it. I am assuming it is a typo.

SEC Scotty · Post by **SEC Scotty** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:45 am

Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:10 pm

SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.

2009 - He's about two months too young for this coming draft.

Gopher Blog · Post by **Gopher Blog** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:13 pm

SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.

2009.

stickboy1956 · Post by **stickboy1956** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:53 am

Gopher Blog wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009.

Another A player for UND in 2009 - from Minnesota to boot.

Gopher Blog · Post by **Gopher Blog** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:06 pm

stickboy1956 wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009.
Another A player for UND in 2009 - from Minnesota to boot.

What can we say... Minnesotans know how to develop good hockey players.

mch · Post by **mch** » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:34 pm

what does limited viewing mean

Offside · Post by **Offside** » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:40 pm

NHL CSS hasn't had enough time to see the player in the past few months in question to place them (or not) in the A, B or C classification .

Observer85 · Post by **Observer85** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:32 pm

Offside wrote:NHL CSS hasn't had enough time to see the player in the past few months in question to place them (or not) in the A, B or C classification .

In most cases it is due to the player being injured and not having the chance to play as many games as others.

trojantommie · Post by **trojantommie** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:20 am

What is meant by the heading limited viewing?

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:34 am

trojantommie wrote:What is meant by the heading limited viewing?

These are players that Central Scouting has an interest in keeping an eye on, but haven't seen enough (often because of injury) of them to place them in the "A","B" or "C" catagories.

trojantommie · Post by **trojantommie** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:26 am

Thx for the clarification

hockey nut · Post by **hockey nut** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:11 pm

What kid from thr"A" list will be the highest draft pick from Minnesota in Junes draft?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Central Scouting List

Limied viewing

Re: Limied viewing

Draft