And I support you?Neutron 14 wrote:At least Rogers isn't on the schedule...
Anoka? Hell yes I do.

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
I don't think the same would apply for 4AA. The finals are in the smaller building and it will fill up without too much trouble - ticket sales won't be a factor like it was for the Mariucci finals. If 4AA doesn't get shown it will be for a different reason.wbmd wrote:FSN has announced its schedule of high school games for the 2007-08 season of Hockey Night in Minnesota. The Upper Midwest cable network will broadcast 16 regular season high school hockey games and *MAY carry the Section 4AA Section Championship game as well.
It will probably end up just like the section 5AA and 6AA finals from last year when Marriucci Arena and the sections wouldn't allow it.
Although, it's not much smaller than Mariucci.Govs93 wrote:I don't think the same would apply for 4AA. The finals are in the smaller building and it will fill up without too much trouble - ticket sales won't be a factor like it was for the Mariucci finals. If 4AA doesn't get shown it will be for a different reason.wbmd wrote:FSN has announced its schedule of high school games for the 2007-08 season of Hockey Night in Minnesota. The Upper Midwest cable network will broadcast 16 regular season high school hockey games and *MAY carry the Section 4AA Section Championship game as well.
It will probably end up just like the section 5AA and 6AA finals from last year when Marriucci Arena and the sections wouldn't allow it.
5,000 seats.wbmd wrote:Although, it's not much smaller than Mariucci.Govs93 wrote:I don't think the same would apply for 4AA. The finals are in the smaller building and it will fill up without too much trouble - ticket sales won't be a factor like it was for the Mariucci finals. If 4AA doesn't get shown it will be for a different reason.wbmd wrote:FSN has announced its schedule of high school games for the 2007-08 season of Hockey Night in Minnesota. The Upper Midwest cable network will broadcast 16 regular season high school hockey games and *MAY carry the Section 4AA Section Championship game as well.
It will probably end up just like the section 5AA and 6AA finals from last year when Marriucci Arena and the sections wouldn't allow it.
I would much rather watch Buffalo then GR/DE/HT or HM. Your arrogant recruiter school attutude is typical of the "Pioneer Tradition" There was no better game that aired last season than Buffalo vs Duluth East...btw Buffalo won that game...hillmurray2010 wrote:I cant complain seeing that they put Hill on twice (probably three times), but I'd think people would rather see the game vs. WBL or the HM vs. Holy Angels game then the games vs. Moorehead or STA. I mean, the White Bear-Hill game is probably the biggest rivalry game in the state and would probably be the easiest to market. I really dont care though, cause I'll be squished into Aldrich at those two games anyways.
As everyone else is saying, I'd much rather watch Grand Rapids, or Hermantown, or Duluth East then Stillwater or Eagan or BuffaloI dont know they picked some of the games they did.
(Tentative probably means yes if it's White Bear versus Hill or no if one of those teams loses earlier in sections which is probably pretty unlikely. I think Roseville lost a lot of seniors last year and Centenial got moved out of the section.)
Duluth East vs. Cloquet was an awesome FSN game last year as well. I wouldnt say that the East-Buffalo game ran away with the game of the year by any stretch.HOFam'r wrote:I would much rather watch Buffalo then GR/DE/HT or HM. Your arrogant recruiter school attutude is typical of the "Pioneer Tradition" There was no better game that aired last season than Buffalo vs Duluth East...btw Buffalo won that game...hillmurray2010 wrote:I cant complain seeing that they put Hill on twice (probably three times), but I'd think people would rather see the game vs. WBL or the HM vs. Holy Angels game then the games vs. Moorehead or STA. I mean, the White Bear-Hill game is probably the biggest rivalry game in the state and would probably be the easiest to market. I really dont care though, cause I'll be squished into Aldrich at those two games anyways.
As everyone else is saying, I'd much rather watch Grand Rapids, or Hermantown, or Duluth East then Stillwater or Eagan or BuffaloI dont know they picked some of the games they did.
(Tentative probably means yes if it's White Bear versus Hill or no if one of those teams loses earlier in sections which is probably pretty unlikely. I think Roseville lost a lot of seniors last year and Centenial got moved out of the section.)
-eagan is perhaps no Grand Rapids, DE or Hermantown but being the highest scoring team the last 2 years in the lake and placing in the top 3 two years in a row is a bit more qualified than that of eastview and jefferson's fsn televised game last year...the last couple years they have proven themselves, not taking sides but coming from a high school hockey fan they have held their ownAs everyone else is saying, I'd much rather watch Grand Rapids, or Hermantown, or Duluth East then Stillwater or Eagan or Buffalo I dont know they picked some of the games they did
CloquetGR3343 wrote:Nice schedule. FSN should be ashamed of themselves. They've clearly eliminated the north teams from their schedule. Must be of the mind that northern folk don't belong. Televising games was a great idea, and in the last couple of years, they've done a good job spreading things out, but this year they've done the north an injustice. The defending champs get on once(maybe twice)but Stillwater is a given? No GR, no East, but Cloquet vs Buffalo? Who thought that would be a better matchup than Roseau vs Rapids from the far north? A rematch of the state finals is more appealing than most of what they've got scheduled. It appears there is only three maybe four north teams listed which is another slap at northern teams. Why don't they just sell a package and call it ANYONE WHO IS NOT FROM THE NORTH? I really do think it's a joke. As a hockey fan in general, I'd rather watch Roseau vs anyone or GR vs East compared to Stillwater vs whoever. At least mix it up a bit.
I Think he is saying where is:O-townClown wrote:CloquetGR3343 wrote:Nice schedule. FSN should be ashamed of themselves. They've clearly eliminated the north teams from their schedule. Must be of the mind that northern folk don't belong. Televising games was a great idea, and in the last couple of years, they've done a good job spreading things out, but this year they've done the north an injustice. The defending champs get on once(maybe twice)but Stillwater is a given? No GR, no East, but Cloquet vs Buffalo? Who thought that would be a better matchup than Roseau vs Rapids from the far north? A rematch of the state finals is more appealing than most of what they've got scheduled. It appears there is only three maybe four north teams listed which is another slap at northern teams. Why don't they just sell a package and call it ANYONE WHO IS NOT FROM THE NORTH? I really do think it's a joke. As a hockey fan in general, I'd rather watch Roseau vs anyone or GR vs East compared to Stillwater vs whoever. At least mix it up a bit.
Warroad
Roseau
Eveleth
Lake of the Woods
Moorhead
Is the problem that there aren't northern teams, or that the one you care most about isn't on there?