8AA - 2007-08 Preview

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:17 pm

1. Roseau...for obvious reasons.
2. Moorhead
3. Tech
4. Buffalo
5. Brainerd

3-5 is a complete toss up, and Moorhead should be solid but not at the same caliber as in years past.

the mullet · Post by **the mullet** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:38 pm

STC18 wrote:1. Roseau...for obvious reasons.
2. Moorhead
3. Tech
4. Buffalo
5. Brainerd

3-5 is a complete toss up, and Moorhead should be solid but not at the same caliber as in years past.

Which is exactly why Roseau will have a.... dare I say it CAKEWALK to the state tournament once again. That may be BOLD but they didn't lose much and the rest of their section is the say or worse compared to last year.

lampthelight · Post by **lampthelight** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:06 am

cesar_maniago wrote:Is the Shawn Chambers who coaches Northern Lights the same Shawn Chambers who used to play for the North Stars?

From what I've heard. He is the same Shawn Chambers.

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:10 am

the mullet wrote:
STC18 wrote:1. Roseau...for obvious reasons.
2. Moorhead
3. Tech
4. Buffalo
5. Brainerd

3-5 is a complete toss up, and Moorhead should be solid but not at the same caliber as in years past.

Which is exactly why Roseau will have a.... dare I say it CAKEWALK to the state tournament once again. That may be BOLD but they didn't lose much and the rest of their section is the say or worse compared to last year.

They had a cake walk last year? Wow, where were you. They lost to Moorhead 4-1 and 6-1, then beat them in the finals. Far from a cake walk.

RedWhite&Blue · Post by **RedWhite&Blue** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:26 am

I'm agreeing with RLstars. Roseaus past season was not a cake-walk by any means, they had to compete all the way through.

HOFam'r · Post by **HOFam'r** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:45 pm

If that's the case they must have had a cakewalk to the State Championship as well???

pucknstick10 · Post by **pucknstick10** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:46 pm

I think he is saying they will make it to state in again in a cakewalk not that last years trip was a cakewalk.

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:46 am

So week 1 of the Section 8AA games begin this week. Who plays who?? Predictions on these games, let's hear it.

BrainerdHockey · Post by **BrainerdHockey** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:00 pm

YES it's the same shawn chambers who played for the north stars however hes not playing so the team is gonna suck....IN brainerds scrimmage against tech, brainerd played three goalies and two goals for tech were scored by a kid who played for brainerd last year...both of his goals were flukes and weak....

1 roseau
2 moorehead
3 brainerd
4 buffalo
5 tech

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:25 pm

BrainerdHockey wrote:YES it's the same shawn chambers who played for the north stars however hes not playing so the team is gonna suck....IN brainerds scrimmage against tech, brainerd played three goalies and two goals for tech were scored by a kid who played for brainerd last year...both of his goals were flukes and weak....

I watched the scrimmage, and I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Yes, 2 goals were scored by a previous warrior, but flukes??

I didn't realize that taking a puck hard to the net and battling to put it in was considered a fluke goal?? Interesting. Remember the scoreboard doesn't say how pretty the goal was, it just gives a number. That number was 3, one higher than Brainerd. Tech won -- don't count them out this season.

BrainerdHockey · Post by **BrainerdHockey** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:51 am

by fluke i meant on the goalies said they were weak goals and he probably should of stopped them both...and the varsity goalie didn't allow a goal

HSHockey1 · Post by **HSHockey1** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:58 pm

1 The eventual state champs THE Roseau rams

2 Moorhead
3 Brainerd
4 Buffalo
5 Tech

International Falls · Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:17 pm

i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

HSHockey1 · Post by **HSHockey1** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:18 pm

International Falls wrote:i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:19 pm

International Falls wrote:i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

I heard that as well. I hear they have 5-6 kids being looked at for Edina Squirt A team 2008-09

International Falls · Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:25 pm

HSHockey1 wrote:
International Falls wrote:i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW

HSHockey1 · Post by **HSHockey1** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:27 pm

International Falls wrote:
HSHockey1 wrote:
International Falls wrote:i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW

yeah, your right, and im just going to "shoot in the dark" here for a second and say the vast majority of people on here know what they are talking about, and the statement that river lakes has a solid team makes me question your knowledge about "hock" sir

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:27 pm

International Falls wrote:
HSHockey1 wrote:
International Falls wrote:i hear River lakes has a solid team this year.

RIW

in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW

Well now that I realize you're being serious with the River lakes comment, I can make the assumption that you're a cocaine addict. If you think River Lakes will be good this year, you need to retake 2nd grade.

HSHockey1 · Post by **HSHockey1** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:29 pm

nipe87 wrote:
International Falls wrote:
HSHockey1 wrote:
in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW
Well now that I realize you're being serious with the River lakes comment, I can make the assumption that you're a cocaine addict. If you think River Lakes will be good this year, you need to retake 2nd grade.

cocaine addict, re-take second grade jeeez harsh words, one or the other is enough man no need to lay into the man he knows he is wrong lets end it here

hockeyfan002 · Post by **hockeyfan002** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:30 pm

all i have to add to this thread is lol.

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:31 pm

Thank you HighschoolHockey, I got carried away:
But lets get real here

Back to section 8AA.

International Falls · Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:37 pm

HSHockey1 wrote:
International Falls wrote:
HSHockey1 wrote:
in tennis or what...in hockey thats news to me

Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW

yeah, your right, and im just going to "shoot in the dark" here for a second and say the vast majority of people on here know what they are talking about, and the statement that river lakes has a solid team makes me question your knowledge about "hock" sir

Im just trying to be a little postive. jeez

RIW

nipe87 · Post by **nipe87** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:38 pm

International Falls wrote:
HSHockey1 wrote:
International Falls wrote:
Isn't this web site called minn hock. Im just shooting in the dark here but, i think Hock is short for hockey, so im probably talking about hockey...go figure

RIW

yeah, your right, and im just going to "shoot in the dark" here for a second and say the vast majority of people on here know what they are talking about, and the statement that river lakes has a solid team makes me question your knowledge about "hock" sir

Im just trying to be a little postive. jeez

RIW

A little

5 Hole · Post by **5 Hole** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:41 am

HSHockey1 wrote:yeah, your right, and im just going to "shoot in the dark" here for a second and say the vast majority of people on here know what they are talking about, and the statement that river lakes has a solid team makes me question your knowledge about "hock" sir

Come on, give International Falls a break. I'm gonna "shoot in the dark" and say computers just made their way up to I. Falls in the past month, so maybe he doesn't realize he typed in that River Lakes was going to "have a solid team". . . Just a thought

Fargo · Post by **Fargo** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:04 pm

RLStars wrote:
the mullet wrote:
STC18 wrote:1. Roseau...for obvious reasons.
2. Moorhead
3. Tech
4. Buffalo
5. Brainerd

3-5 is a complete toss up, and Moorhead should be solid but not at the same caliber as in years past.

Which is exactly why Roseau will have a.... dare I say it CAKEWALK to the state tournament once again. That may be BOLD but they didn't lose much and the rest of their section is the say or worse compared to last year.
They had a cake walk last year? Wow, where were you. They lost to Moorhead 4-1 and 6-1, then beat them in the finals. Far from a cake walk.

Last year nearly everyone thought Moorhead was going to walk to state.

Roseau should not get too cocky with all the attention they are getting from TV and The Hockey News. Could be too much of an ego trip