Bantam A Rankings
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:57 pm
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:37 pm
bantam a rankings
I'll bite...
As posted on MNHockeyRankings.com:
1. Eden Prairie
2. St Cloud
3. Wayzata
4. Duluth East
5. Edina
6. Champlin Park
7. Moorhead
8. Roseau
9. Burnsville
10. Minnetonka
11. White Bear Lake
12. Bl Jefferson
13. Centennial
14. Woodbury
15. Stillwater
16. Roseville
17. Rochester Red
18. Maple Grove
19. Grand Rapids
20. Eagan
Others worth mentioning, that might be ranked a little too low: (23) Bemidji. (34) EGF, (39) Faribault
As posted on MNHockeyRankings.com:
1. Eden Prairie
2. St Cloud
3. Wayzata
4. Duluth East
5. Edina
6. Champlin Park
7. Moorhead
8. Roseau
9. Burnsville
10. Minnetonka
11. White Bear Lake
12. Bl Jefferson
13. Centennial
14. Woodbury
15. Stillwater
16. Roseville
17. Rochester Red
18. Maple Grove
19. Grand Rapids
20. Eagan
Others worth mentioning, that might be ranked a little too low: (23) Bemidji. (34) EGF, (39) Faribault
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:40 pm
I would Agree
I definately agree with the rankings above me
1. Eden Prairie
2. St Cloud
3. Wayzata
4. Duluth East
5. Edina
6. Champlin Park
7. Moorhead
8. Roseau
1. Eden Prairie
2. St Cloud
3. Wayzata
4. Duluth East
5. Edina
6. Champlin Park
7. Moorhead
8. Roseau
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:43 pm
[quote="MinnesotaHockey32"]This is just my personal opinion. all rankings do is cause problems. i mean i get what people r trying to do with them by letting teams no about where they are compared to others. all rankings are, is a bunch of opinions. and opinions are like @$$ holes, everyone has one.[/quote]
looks like someones team is not ranked where they THINK they should be!
looks like someones team is not ranked where they THINK they should be!

-
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
whatever
What problems are those?MinnesotaHockey32 wrote: all rankings do is cause problems.

Be kind. Rewind.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:43 pm
Well were ranked 4th according to LPH so thats NOT the case.Shooter75 wrote:looks like someones team is not ranked where they THINK they should be!MinnesotaHockey32 wrote:This is just my personal opinion. all rankings do is cause problems. i mean i get what people r trying to do with them by letting teams no about where they are compared to others. all rankings are, is a bunch of opinions. and opinions are like @$$ holes, everyone has one.
Last edited by MinnesotaHockey32 on Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:43 pm
Re: whatever
Disputes between people who think that the rankings already posted aren't correct in their minds. If you have a reason like that they're ranked to low because of false information being sent in then yea i see why u r arguing, or else they think that the rankings already posted aren't correct in their minds.O-townClown wrote:What problems are those?MinnesotaHockey32 wrote: all rankings do is cause problems.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:43 pm
-
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:05 pm
- Location: The sin bin
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:10 pm
I agree except about the a$$ hole part, ranked teams are just teams you want to show up and they're the ones that you wanna beatMinnesotaHockey32 wrote:This is just my personal opinion. all rankings do is cause problems. i mean i get what people r trying to do with them by letting teams no about where they are compared to others. all rankings are, is a bunch of opinions. and opinions are like @$$ holes, everyone has one.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:09 am