Private-to-Public School Transfer

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

CrashDaNET
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:21 pm

Private-to-Public School Transfer

Post by CrashDaNET »

Hearing conflicting stories...

Can a student go back to his hometown to play hockey if he is currently playing for a private school with NO penalty?

CDH back to Highland Park vs CDH back to Woodbury

Here is what I have heard...
If you live in the Highland Park School District, you can leave CDH and go back to Highland Park HS with NO penalty. (because CDH and Highland Park are in the same school district.)
But...
If you hometown is Woodbury, then there would be a 1 year penalty (because CDH is in a different school district then Woodbury)

Answers have ranged from....

A) No Penalty - If a youth wants to go back to his hometown school then he does NOT have to sit out? - (Does not matter what there school district is in)

B) No Penalty - As long as you hometown is in the same school district as the Private School

C) 1 year out of sports - no ifs. ands, or buts...

:?:
Blue&Gold

Post by Blue&Gold »

Well, it's supposed to be "C". But it probably depends on who the kid is, and how good is he.. (ducking for cover on that one...)
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Private-to-Public School Transfer

Post by wbmd »

CrashDaNET wrote:Hearing conflicting stories...

Can a student go back to his hometown to play hockey if he is currently playing for a private school with NO penalty?

CDH back to Highland Park vs CDH back to Woodbury

Here is what I have heard...
If you live in the Highland Park School District, you can leave CDH and go back to Highland Park HS with NO penalty. (because CDH and Highland Park are in the same school district.)
But...
If you hometown is Woodbury, then there would be a 1 year penalty (because CDH is in a different school district then Woodbury)

Answers have ranged from....

A) No Penalty - If a youth wants to go back to his hometown school then he does NOT have to sit out? - (Does not matter what there school district is in)

B) No Penalty - As long as you hometown is in the same school district as the Private School

C) 1 year out of sports - no ifs. ands, or buts...

:?:
Actually, the privates (Cretin included) aren't even in school districts.
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

C is the answer unless they change residence.
ya-man
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:29 am

Post by ya-man »

As I understand the new rule, transfers are permitted as long as the kid is living in the community of the new school. Example, an Eden Prarie kid wants to transfer to Holy Angels. His family would have to live in Richfield. This is how I remember it coming down last spring.
AngusYoung
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:06 pm

Post by AngusYoung »

Let me throw this one out: Say there is a kid that is currently in 10th grade that lives in Michigan and would like to come and play hockey in Minnesota @ the school his Dad attended as a youth. If Mom and Dad stay in MI to work and live and the kid plans on living with an uncle in said community he wants to play for, is there any issues, as far as the High School League is concerned, with this kid playing hockey next year? Only folks with definite answers and not suppositions need reply.

AY 8)
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

AngusYoung wrote:Let me throw this one out: Say there is a kid that is currently in 10th grade that lives in Michigan and would like to come and play hockey in Minnesota @ the school his Dad attended as a youth. If Mom and Dad stay in MI to work and live and the kid plans on living with an uncle in said community he wants to play for, is there any issues, as far as the High School League is concerned, with this kid playing hockey next year? Only folks with definite answers and not suppositions need reply.

AY 8)
If the Uncle is now the legal guardian of the child, and it is the childs primary residency, no problem.
sideways
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:28 pm

Post by sideways »

[quote="ya-man"]As I understand the new rule, transfers are permitted as long as the kid is living in the community of the new school. Example, an Eden Prarie kid wants to transfer to Holy Angels. His family would have to live in Richfield. This is how I remember it coming down last spring.[/quote]
In this scenario, would it not then be the case--
An Eden Prairie kid lives in E.P. goes to Holy Angels as a ninth grader, but decides he wants to return to E.P. as a tenth grader?
Without penalty???
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Can't Never Tried wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:Let me throw this one out: Say there is a kid that is currently in 10th grade that lives in Michigan and would like to come and play hockey in Minnesota @ the school his Dad attended as a youth. If Mom and Dad stay in MI to work and live and the kid plans on living with an uncle in said community he wants to play for, is there any issues, as far as the High School League is concerned, with this kid playing hockey next year? Only folks with definite answers and not suppositions need reply.

AY 8)
If the Uncle is now the legal guardian of the child, and it is the childs primary residency, no problem.
I'll add this below:

from this link:
http://www.mesabieast.k12.mn.us/ATHLETI ... bility.pdf
It's the exact copy from the MSHSL
6. Enrollment Options Program: a student who utilizes Minnesota
Statute 124D.03 Enrollment Options Programs, and transfers without a
corresponding change of residence by the student's parents shall elect one
of the following:
a. retain full eligibility for varsity competition for one (1) calendar
year at the school where the student was enrolled prior to the transfer
after which time the student shall become fully eligible at the school to
which the student has open enrolled; or
b. be eligible only at the non-varsity level in the school to which
the student has open enrolled for one (1) calendar year.
C. If none of the provisions in Section 2 (above) are met, the student is
ineligible for varsity competition for a period of one (1) calendar year
beginning with the first day of attendance in the new school.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:Let me throw this one out: Say there is a kid that is currently in 10th grade that lives in Michigan and would like to come and play hockey in Minnesota @ the school his Dad attended as a youth. If Mom and Dad stay in MI to work and live and the kid plans on living with an uncle in said community he wants to play for, is there any issues, as far as the High School League is concerned, with this kid playing hockey next year? Only folks with definite answers and not suppositions need reply.

AY 8)
If the Uncle is now the legal guardian of the child, and it is the childs primary residency, no problem.
I'll add this below:

from this link:
http://www.mesabieast.k12.mn.us/ATHLETI ... bility.pdf
It's the exact copy from the MSHSL
6. Enrollment Options Program: a student who utilizes Minnesota
Statute 124D.03 Enrollment Options Programs, and transfers without a
corresponding change of residence by the student's parents shall elect one
of the following:
a. retain full eligibility for varsity competition for one (1) calendar
year at the school where the student was enrolled prior to the transfer
after which time the student shall become fully eligible at the school to
which the student has open enrolled; or
b. be eligible only at the non-varsity level in the school to which
the student has open enrolled for one (1) calendar year.
C. If none of the provisions in Section 2 (above) are met, the student is
ineligible for varsity competition for a period of one (1) calendar year
beginning with the first day of attendance in the new school.
However, in the case of Joe Rubbelke, he will be eligible for all varsity sports at North St. Paul next school year since he is already attending North.

Currently, Rubbelke plays football and baseball at Harding and hockey for Johnson (because Harding doesn't have a hockey program) while attending North St. Paul.
thetender30
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:42 pm

Post by thetender30 »

its C, i transfered private to public back to my hometown and i can only play jv this year..anyone who thinks it not this is wrong..i am a victim
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy »

thetender30 wrote:its C, i transfered private to public back to my hometown and i can only play jv this year..anyone who thinks it not this is wrong..i am a victim
I just knew that this rule would be a good one. :roll:
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

thetender30 wrote:its C, i transfered private to public back to my hometown and i can only play jv this year..anyone who thinks it not this is wrong..i am a victim
Victim? You had choices. You could have filed your paperwork by last March 15th and incurred no penalty. You could still play varsity for the private school you left. There is an appeal process for special circumstances (if there were any) which you could have used. Or you can play JV at your new school. You made your choice.

I like this rule.
Got2luvhockey
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:26 am

Post by Got2luvhockey »

This new rule is horrible. My son was going to a private school and decided to opt back to his public school a few miles away to be with his friends the last two years of high school. We did move him just prior to this ruling so he is now making a difference at his public school - but I don't think that kids should be able to go back and forth.
54fighting
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: The sin bin

Post by 54fighting »

I have another question.
Lets say a student attends a private school for a year and then there is a change in the financial capabilities of the family ( job loss, health care costs, ect) and they can no longer afford to attend the private school.
Would this player have to sit out a full year or is there some kind of board that would hear a situation like this?
pioneers
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: St Paul

Post by pioneers »

The reality is that no matter what rule you make, there are going to be people who don't like it. Everyone seems to want it so that it benefits their special interests the best. I say let's give the new rule a chance and see how it washes out.
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

pioneers wrote:Everyone seems to want it so that it benefits their special interests the best.
Ya think? :lol:
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

54fighting wrote:I have another question.
Lets say a student attends a private school for a year and then there is a change in the financial capabilities of the family ( job loss, health care costs, ect) and they can no longer afford to attend the private school.
Would this player have to sit out a full year or is there some kind of board that would hear a situation like this?
There is a appeal process, but I have no idea how it works.

The situation you mentioned was discussed at length, and a provision for this exception was in the original draft. It stipulated that you could go between public and private in the same public school district. The privates fought (and won) against having any school district "assigned" to the private schools.
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy »

Neutron 14 wrote:
pioneers wrote:Everyone seems to want it so that it benefits their special interests the best.
Ya think? :lol:
Some of us actually want rules that make sense regardless of who they may favor.

This rule favors no one and punishes children for changing schools in a state where the people have legislated open enrollment. It also sends a message that sports is more important than academics.

It a butt stupid rule no matter who it might favor in any given circunstance(s).
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

packerboy wrote:This rule favors no one and punishes children for changing schools in a state where the people have legislated open enrollment. It also sends a message that sports is more important than academics.
How so? It's not as if the kids aren't allowed to go to class if they transfer. Since they have to sit on the sidelines for a year, that should give them plenty of opportunity to hit the books in the interim - and that's what's most important, right?!

Just like you say, it favors no one, but clearly nobody is being punished either. It's just more opportunity to crank out more highly educated private schoolers with more time to spend in the library. :lol:
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy »

Govs93 wrote:
packerboy wrote:This rule favors no one and punishes children for changing schools in a state where the people have legislated open enrollment. It also sends a message that sports is more important than academics.
How so? It's not as if the kids aren't allowed to go to class if they transfer. Since they have to sit on the sidelines for a year, that should give them plenty of opportunity to hit the books in the interim - and that's what's most important, right?!

Just like you say, it favors no one, but clearly nobody is being punished either. It's just more opportunity to crank out more highly educated private schoolers with more time to spend in the library. :lol:
Denying a child the oportunity to play Varsity sports is not punishment. What a novel thought. So, when the kids get caught drinking and kicked off the team, its a reward.

I would have never thought of that.
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

packerboy wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
packerboy wrote:This rule favors no one and punishes children for changing schools in a state where the people have legislated open enrollment. It also sends a message that sports is more important than academics.
How so? It's not as if the kids aren't allowed to go to class if they transfer. Since they have to sit on the sidelines for a year, that should give them plenty of opportunity to hit the books in the interim - and that's what's most important, right?!

Just like you say, it favors no one, but clearly nobody is being punished either. It's just more opportunity to crank out more highly educated private schoolers with more time to spend in the library. :lol:
Denying a child the oportunity to play Varsity sports is not punishment. What a novel thought. So, when the kids get caught drinking and kicked off the team, its a reward.

I would have never thought of that.
I'm not sure how you're equating the two.

And the child has every opportunity play varsity sports at the high school level... at the school the child was originally attending. If academics were the true reason for the child transferring, in all likelihood that would have occurred prior to the child enrolling in high school during the 8th grade.

I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a public school frosh or sophomore who has enough talent to play hockey at a private school, transerring to that school as a sophmore or junior for "academic reasons". Gimme a break.

Image
Blue&Gold

Post by Blue&Gold »

Let's face it.. the rules came down because a few players/schools abused the practice. If memory serves, the straw that broke the camel's back was a group of girl basketball players in the metro area. Hockey groups complained about the practice, but someone finally went too far.
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

Blue&Gold wrote:Let's face it.. the rules came down because a few players/schools abused the practice. If memory serves, the straw that broke the camel's back was a group of girl basketball players in the metro area. Hockey groups complained about the practice, but someone finally went too far.
I thought St. Paul Central was ruling girls' basketball... who the hell is transferring there?!
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy »

Govs93 wrote:
I thought St. Paul Central was ruling girls' basketball... who the hell is transferring there?!
A lot of very good basketball players.
Post Reply