Little Falls Vs. Saint Cloud Apollo

GopherPuckPlayer · Post by **GopherPuckPlayer** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:49 pm

Will LF bounce back from the Cathedral loss?

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:51 pm

Yes, they will with a nice W against the north-siders 4-1.

buschleauge · Post by **buschleauge** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:59 pm

no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:13 pm

i got balls wrote:I think Apollo comes out plays well the first line will score 4 goals Apollo wins 4-2

Goin with da upset pick, eh?

wild06 · Post by **wild06** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:40 pm

LF-6
SCA-3

slapshot89 · Post by **slapshot89** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:47 pm

I'm going with LF 6-2

nsideHocKey17 · Post by **nsideHocKey17** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:05 pm

little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.

[gspan] · Post by **[gspan]** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm

buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!

learn how to spell?
hanowski

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:08 pm

[gspan] wrote:
buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
learn how to spell?
hanowski

I said that in an earlier thread as well. Maybe somebody needs to go back to spelling class in 3rd grade.

[gspan] · Post by **[gspan]** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:08 pm

nsideHocKey17 wrote:little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.

rofl.

stop being so biased, be a realist.

even if apollo can pull out a win, it won't be 7-1.
two solid first lines could end up being a wash, it might be up to the other lines to step up

[gspan] · Post by **[gspan]** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:09 pm

STC18 wrote:
[gspan] wrote:
buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
learn how to spell?
hanowski
I said that in an earlier thread as well. Maybe somebody needs to go back to spelling class in 3rd grade.

woah. replying to my post just seconds after, perhaps STC18 also has telekenesis powers...? it remains to be seen

buschleauge · Post by **buschleauge** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:11 pm

sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:18 pm

buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls

But aren't is.

[gspan] · Post by **[gspan]** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:40 pm

buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls

he has a point.

yuu kneed two prctise!

what's wrong with this sentence busch?

how about you try at home to correct it.

the correct sentence was:

you need to practice!

wasn't the fun?

Donkey9 · Post by **Donkey9** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:04 am

nsideHocKey17 wrote:
little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.

rofl.

stop being so biased, be a realist.

even if apollo can pull out a win, it won't be 7-1.
two solid first lines could end up being a wash, it might be up to the other lines to step up

Thank you, finally someone else to respond to this guys so far fetched comments...

LF- 4
SCA- 1

_______________________________
gspan actually not that big of a plug!

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:59 am

If the Eagles can stay out of the box this might be a very good game. They haven't shown me they can do that.

Little Falls 5
Apollo 2

Mite-dad · Post by **Mite-dad** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:45 am

[gspan] wrote:
buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls
he has a point.

yuu kneed two prctise!

what's wrong with this sentence busch?

how about you try at home to correct it.

the correct sentence was:

you need to practice!
Sheesh, for a guy commenting on spelling, maybe you should look into the proper use of capital letters.
wasn't the fun?

Mite-dad · Post by **Mite-dad** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:46 am

....and Little Falls gets a 4-3 win.

Stealth · Post by **Stealth** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:15 am

Another section 6A loss for Apollo.

Small Falls 6
Apollo 2

slap-shot69 · Post by **slap-shot69** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:17 am

i dont know i think this one has some real potental

GopherPuckPlayer · Post by **GopherPuckPlayer** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:20 am

Apollo has more L's with teams we have played against, but the one W they have against Sauk brings me back to LF game against Sauk, was it a fluke? Or is LF going to run all over Apollo?

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:05 pm

GopherPuckPlayer wrote:Apollo has more L's with teams we have played against, but the one W they have against Sauk brings me back to LF game against Sauk, was it a fluke? Or is LF going to run all over Apollo?

I don't think they will run all over them but with the way Apollo has been playing lately I would definitely say that Small Falls is the heavy favorite.

buschleauge · Post by **buschleauge** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:10 pm

heavier than Pat Williams

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:21 pm

buschleauge wrote:heavier than Pat Williams

Little Falls lost to Sauk Rapids who Apollo beat in the GCC. After that it has been down hill for Apollo but if they can put together a game that resembles the one they played against Sauk Rapids this could be a very good game.

GopherPuckPlayer · Post by **GopherPuckPlayer** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:53 pm

LF-1
SCA-0

Waytashek with a power play goal