Woodbury Varsity
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
david eddy is always hurting as a result of the way he plays, but not really injured. he plays free safety in football and catcher in baseball as well as hockey, so no matter what kind of shape hes in his body will take a beating. but as far as i know his lack of goals recently is not due to an injury, just a bit of a slump. it happens to the best of emwbmd wrote:Anyone know if David Eddy might be playing injured?
In a 6-1 win over Forest Lake, he only had one point (goal) and in their 11-1 victory over Prior Lake, he only one goal there as well.
Thanks!royals0951 wrote:david eddy is always hurting as a result of the way he plays, but not really injured. he plays free safety in football and catcher in baseball as well as hockey, so no matter what kind of shape hes in his body will take a beating. but as far as i know his lack of goals recently is not due to an injury, just a bit of a slump. it happens to the best of emwbmd wrote:Anyone know if David Eddy might be playing injured?
In a 6-1 win over Forest Lake, he only had one point (goal) and in their 11-1 victory over Prior Lake, he only one goal there as well.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
well u sound pretty stupid now woodbury is a very solid team and is still getting better with every gamehesabaddmann wrote:ROSEMOUNT??...championship game?.....you gotta be kidding....Pucknutz69 wrote:With the group from Bantams coming up they will be strong and I will say it first
Woodbury will win the Suburban East. And fight with Rosemount for the Section Champs.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:10 pm
What does this have to do with Woodburys' varsity??wblsuperfan A wrote:For the most part, White Bear has played well this year even with a fluke loss to Park and a bad game vs Hill. They will get it together and win the SEC and eventually battle Hill in sections for a trip to state.

Besides, Woodbury could just sweep your Bears this year.
Re: Woodbury
Woodbury is no good?? Perhaps a bit overrated - depending on which ratings you go by - but they are good.tshockey2 wrote:This team is no good. They have lost to some really bad teams. Every year I hear this is the year. The lost to Hastings did it for me. I hear next year they are going to be really good. A bad team in a bad Conference.
Their losses to Rosemount and Hopkins are against good teams. The loss to Hastings tends to show not to take any team lightly - in the S.E.C. or any game. Remember that Hastings also beat Roseville.
Their youth programs are improving each year and Wes Bolin has definitely helped to turn the Woodbury program around.