S.E.C. What's Up??

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:36 pm

SEC Scotty wrote:With the new East Ridge high school being build in Woodbury it will be interesting to see what effect it will have on the Woodbury program.

True. That will be quite interesting how it affects the Woodbury program when the school opens in 2009.

komada77 · Post by **komada77** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:19 pm

wbmd wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:With the new East Ridge high school being build in Woodbury it will be interesting to see what effect it will have on the Woodbury program.
True. That will be quite interesting how it affects the Woodbury program when the school opens in 2009.

From what I've heard, the enrollment at the schools will be similar to the enrollment at the 2 Jr. highs in Woodbury. Students at Woodbury JH will go to Woodbury HS, and students at Lake JH will go to East Ridge. Traditionally, Lake has had better athletes than WJH in all sports. (For example, Eddy, Erickson, Kopp, Goff, Ogren, and Hyland all went to LJH. Piitman and Nelson are the best current players that came from WJH.)

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:29 pm

komada77 wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:With the new East Ridge high school being build in Woodbury it will be interesting to see what effect it will have on the Woodbury program.

From what I've heard, the enrollment at the schools will be similar to the enrollment at the 2 Jr. highs in Woodbury. Students at Woodbury JH will go to Woodbury HS, and students at Lake JH will go to East Ridge. Traditionally, Lake has had better athletes than WJH in all sports. (For example, Eddy, Erickson, Kopp, Goff, Ogren, and Hyland all went to LJH. Piitman and Nelson are the best current players that came from WJH.)

However, the school board hasn't made a final decision yet. You also have to remember that students from Cottage Grove will be at East Ridge as well.

ALSECORD · Post by **ALSECORD** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm

Which won't help Park obviously. So as far as the SEC is concerned it look's to me like the order of finish in this conference should look much the same for year's to come. Woodbury-W.B-Cretin. With Park-Hastings-Mounds View-Forest Lake as the bottem feeders as i don't see these communities youth teams making much noise..

ROOK EYE · Post by **ROOK EYE** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:45 pm

Just curious. When was the last time someone other than White Bear/Cretin/Roseville won the SEC?

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:53 pm

I dont remember how old the conference is ROOK but I would guess that Hastings won it during the Welch, Taffe years.

ROOK EYE · Post by **ROOK EYE** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:05 pm

The Pack is back, your a Plethra of information. Thank You.. Wow that goes back to the mid/late 90's. Right? Hastings look's to be surging!! Maybe there's a sentimental 10 year anniversery thing going here we don't know about??

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:27 pm

With a bit of research, I found that the Suburban East Conference began play in the 2001-02 season.

Roseville won the first two titles with records of 13-1-0 and 12-1-1.

White Bear won the next two titles finishing 14-2-0 and 13-1-0 in the 2004-05 season.

In 2006 Cretin finished at the top with a 14-2-0 record.

Roseville won it last year at 14-1-1.

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:00 am

wbmd wrote:With a bit of research, I found that the Suburban East Conference began play in the 2001-02 season.

Roseville won the first two titles with records of 13-1-0 and 12-1-1.

White Bear won the next two titles finishing 14-2-0 and 13-1-0 in the 2004-05 season.

In 2006 Cretin finished at the top with a 14-2-0 record.

Roseville won it last year at 14-1-1.

Nice job wbmd. I was wrong about Hastings winning it since those good teams were pre SEC. But ROOK is right. The Pack is back.

Zeke16 · Post by **Zeke16** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:01 pm

Think of the recruiting back and forth between Woodbury and the New School, almost like private/public

hockeyphenom · Post by **hockeyphenom** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:38 pm

woodbury will figure it out...they will send their best athletes to one school. On another note Hastings is looking pretty competitive right now. I dont know what was wrong with Drew Waxlax but i had seen he got back in the game against moundsview saturday getting an assist. He is the only forward i know one the team. One other i kid i have seen play quite a few times is Horsch and he has proven himself to be among the top of the pack for defensemen in the conference for the past 3 years now. A name i am coming to get familiar with is Gleisner also. Every time he plays it seems like he is putting up at least 30-35 saves. As for white bear lake they look really strong wheni have seen them play and will continue to be strong.

hockyman08 · Post by **hockyman08** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:10 pm

komada77 wrote:
wbmd wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:With the new East Ridge high school being build in Woodbury it will be interesting to see what effect it will have on the Woodbury program.
True. That will be quite interesting how it affects the Woodbury program when the school opens in 2009.
From what I've heard, the enrollment at the schools will be similar to the enrollment at the 2 Jr. highs in Woodbury. Students at Woodbury JH will go to Woodbury HS, and students at Lake JH will go to East Ridge. Traditionally, Lake has had better athletes than WJH in all sports. (For example, Eddy, Erickson, Kopp, Goff, Ogren, and Hyland all went to LJH. Piitman and Nelson are the best current players that came from WJH.)

Erickson went to Woodbury, not Lake.

Pucknutz69 · Post by **Pucknutz69** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:19 pm

hockeyphenom wrote:woodbury will figure it out...they will send their best athletes to one school. On another note Hastings is looking pretty competitive right now. I dont know what was wrong with Drew Waxlax but i had seen he got back in the game against moundsview saturday getting an assist. He is the only forward i know one the team. One other i kid i have seen play quite a few times is Horsch and he has proven himself to be among the top of the pack for defensemen in the conference for the past 3 years now. A name i am coming to get familiar with is Gleisner also. Every time he plays it seems like he is putting up at least 30-35 saves. As for white bear lake they look really strong wheni have seen them play and will continue to be strong.

Tobacco Violation. missed 12 games.

Pucknutz69 · Post by **Pucknutz69** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:25 pm

wbmd wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:With the new East Ridge high school being build in Woodbury it will be interesting to see what effect it will have on the Woodbury program.
True. That will be quite interesting how it affects the Woodbury program when the school opens in 2009.

Talk at the school board meetings is they are letting the first class of seniors play at the schools they came from for Varsiy sports. I could see them starting with 9th grade sports teams and working towards Varsity levels. As for hockey Woodbury they have enough to split but where do the Cottage Grove kids come in? This will hurt CG more then anything, they have a good group at peewees strong in numbers and getting better talent wise.

komada77 · Post by **komada77** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:35 pm

hockyman08 wrote:
komada77 wrote:
wbmd wrote: True. That will be quite interesting how it affects the Woodbury program when the school opens in 2009.
From what I've heard, the enrollment at the schools will be similar to the enrollment at the 2 Jr. highs in Woodbury. Students at Woodbury JH will go to Woodbury HS, and students at Lake JH will go to East Ridge. Traditionally, Lake has had better athletes than WJH in all sports. (For example, Eddy, Erickson, Kopp, Goff, Ogren, and Hyland all went to LJH. Piitman and Nelson are the best current players that came from WJH.)
Erickson went to Woodbury, not Lake.

yeah ur right that was a mistake

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:36 pm

Pucknutz69 wrote:
hockeyphenom wrote:woodbury will figure it out...they will send their best athletes to one school. On another note Hastings is looking pretty competitive right now. I dont know what was wrong with Drew Waxlax but i had seen he got back in the game against moundsview saturday getting an assist. He is the only forward i know one the team. One other i kid i have seen play quite a few times is Horsch and he has proven himself to be among the top of the pack for defensemen in the conference for the past 3 years now. A name i am coming to get familiar with is Gleisner also. Every time he plays it seems like he is putting up at least 30-35 saves. As for white bear lake they look really strong wheni have seen them play and will continue to be strong.

Tobacco Violation. missed 12 games.

So he was winded, is that you're saying?

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:43 pm

I see Govs is close to 2000 !! Saving it for something special?

hockeyphenom · Post by **hockeyphenom** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:36 pm

I have a question i was looking at the SEC and there records. How is it that Woodbury lost to Hastings and so did Roseville? But WBL beat them4-0. roseville beat WBL 4-0. Woodbury beat roseville 4-0. I guess what i am trying to say is that this thing is a toss up for the conference ship...

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:09 pm

hockeyphenom wrote:I have a question i was looking at the SEC and there records. How is it that Woodbury lost to Hastings and so did Roseville? But WBL beat them4-0. roseville beat WBL 4-0. Woodbury beat roseville 4-0. I guess what i am trying to say is that this thing is a toss up for the conference ship...

A toss up is one way to describe it. Nothing else really "Grabs" at me.

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:25 am

Current Suburban East standings

(from Minnesota-Scores.net)

conference & season records

Woodbury 6-1-0 & 11-3-0
Roseville 5-2-0 & 9-5-0
Cretin-Derham Hall 5-2-0 & 6-8-0
White Bear Lake 4-2-0 & 9-5-0
Forest Lake 4-4-0 & 8-6-0
Hastings 3-4-0 & 6-9-0
Stillwater Area 3-6-0 & 5-9-0
Mounds View 1-5-0 & 7-6-0
Park of Cottage Grove 1-6-0 & 4-10-0

bardown10 · Post by **bardown10** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:33 pm

Hastings is coming out strong the second half of the season. They beat park which isn't saying much except Hastings was short handed over 20 mins of the game.

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:26 pm

Current Suburban East standings

from Minnesota-Scores.net

Conference record & season record

Woodbury 6-2-0 & 11-4-0
Roseville 6-2-0 & 10-5-0
White Bear Lake 5-2-0 & 10-5-0
Cretin-Derham Hall 5-3-0 & 6-9-0
Forest Lake 5-4-0 & 9-6-0
Hastings 4-4-0 & 7-9-0
Stillwater Area 3-6-0 & 5-10-0
Mounds View 1-6-0 & 7-7-0
Park of Cottage Grove 1-7-0 & 4-11-0

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:03 pm

Suburban East schedule for the week of Jan. 13th

Woodbury
15th at Andover
17th at Mounds View
19th vs. Park

Roseville
15th vs. Blake
17th vs. Stillwater

White Bear Lake
17th at Hastings
19th vs. Mounds View

Cretin
17th vs. Edina
19th at Stillwater

Forest Lake
17th at Park
19th at Hastings

Hastings
17th vs. White Bear Lake
19th vs. Forest Lake

Stillwater
17th at Roseville
19th vs. Cretin

Mounds View
17th vs. Woodbury
19th at White Bear Lake

Park (Cottage Grove)
17th vs. Forest Lake
19th at Woodbury

graf hockey · Post by **graf hockey** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:32 pm

who are top scorers from this conference for each of the teams? since maxpreps isnt always correct or accurate

bardown10 · Post by **bardown10** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:34 pm

Hastings i believe will come out with the crown this year in the SEC they started out 0-8 without Alex Harrington and Drew Waxlax but since they got back Harrington they have one 7 out of there last 8 and got Waxlax a couple games ago. Also Benny Horsch i believe is the best defensman in the conference the kid is an animal and can control a game. Also John Gleisner is on a roll and Jake kimmes fills a nice roll switching in and out with Gleisner and Hastings is rolling full steam ahead. i look at them as a legitimate state tourney competitor, they just had to get it all together first.