Apollo Tech Rd. 2

Ben Dover · Post by **Ben Dover** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:45 pm

Not a very exciting game to watch.. but I think the better team won.

NoUseForAName22 · Post by **NoUseForAName22** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:02 am

i agree the game was dull, sloppy play both ways, typical tech apollo rivalry game

CarGuy · Post by **CarGuy** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:09 am

typical st. cloud hockey if cathedral isnt involved....just not very exciting...

George Blanda · Post by **George Blanda** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:20 am

CarGuy wrote:typical st. cloud hockey if cathedral isnt involved....just not very exciting...

how about in the later 90s and early 2000s when Cathedral would just ice the puck all game and hope for a bounce...

posterman · Post by **posterman** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:08 am

Ben Dover wrote:Not a very exciting game to watch.. but I think the better team won.

As a non-biased observer of the game I dont know about that.....3 of Techs goals were scored off of a deflection by an Apollo player and obviously the empty net goal, not saying it means anything now but minus the fluke goals (which i know happens in hockey) its a 3-1 Apollo victory.

OldTimer1234 · Post by **OldTimer1234** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:33 pm

posterman wrote:
Ben Dover wrote:Not a very exciting game to watch.. but I think the better team won.
As a non-biased observer of the game I dont know about that.....3 of Techs goals were scored off of a deflection by an Apollo player and obviously the empty net goal, not saying it means anything now but minus the fluke goals (which i know happens in hockey) its a 3-1 Apollo victory.

IMO the better team definitely won because even though the goals really weren't coming for Tech, they still controled alot of the game and you can't always base who the better team is just by the score. Their goals may have been lucky but I still feel the better team ended up on top.

George Blanda · Post by **George Blanda** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:41 pm

According to the man keeping score...Apollo had more quality chances than Tech. http://www.rinkwriter.com/mac/apollo_08_01_10.pdf

OldTimer1234 wrote:IMO the better team definitely won because even though the goals really weren't coming for Tech, they still controled alot of the game and you can't always base who the better team is just by the score. Their goals may have been lucky but I still feel the better team ended up on top.

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:07 pm

OldTimer1234 wrote:
posterman wrote:
Ben Dover wrote:Not a very exciting game to watch.. but I think the better team won.
As a non-biased observer of the game I dont know about that.....3 of Techs goals were scored off of a deflection by an Apollo player and obviously the empty net goal, not saying it means anything now but minus the fluke goals (which i know happens in hockey) its a 3-1 Apollo victory.

IMO the better team definitely won because even though the goals really weren't coming for Tech, they still controled alot of the game and you can't always base who the better team is just by the score. Their goals may have been lucky but I still feel the better team ended up on top.

The game looked pretty even from where I was sitting. Both teams had their fair share of good scoring chances.

[gspan] · Post by **[gspan]** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:02 pm

CarGuy wrote:typical st. cloud hockey if cathedral isnt involved....just not very exciting...

um okay haha

Dizzangler · Post by **Dizzangler** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:37 pm

Tech got lucky in this game, dont deny it. Sure they might be a better team, but not by much. Apollo shoulda taken it 3-1.. just bad bounces/deflections