Why is DM still second on rankings?

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
iceman23
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:11 pm

Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by iceman23 »

They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by wbmd »

iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?
What's the date of the ratings?
sachishi4
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: SLP

Post by sachishi4 »

1/12

yeah, that makes no sense
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by BIAFP »

iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by wbmd »

iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?
Guess it depends which ratings you're looking at.


Class A Rankings

FollowThePuck.com
As of 01/14/08

1. Duluth Marshall (7A) - 12-3-0
2. St. Thomas Academy (4A) - 12-3-0
3. International Falls (7A) - 13-1-0
4. Mankato West (1A) - 12-1-0
5. Warroad (8A) - 11-4-0
6. Mahtomedi (4A) - 9-4-2
7. St. Cloud Cathedral (5A) - 10-2-1
8. Little Falls (6A) - 12-3-0
9. Park Rapids Area (8A) - 15-0-0
10. South St. Paul (4A) - 9-3-1
11. Rochester Lourdes (1A) - 11-5-0
12. Albert Lea (1A) - 11-3-0
13. Red Wing (1A) - 8-5-2
14. New Prague (1A) - 9-3-0
15. Duluth Denfeld (5A) - 10-6-0
16. Hermantown (5A) - 8-7-0
17. Virginia/MI-B - 9-6-0
18. Mound-Westonka (2A) - 9-6-0
19. Breck School (2A) - 6-7-1
20. Holy Family Catholic - 8-4-0

On Watch:

Sauk Rapids-Rice - 8-5-1
Minnehaha Academy (4A) - 8-5-1
Fergus Falls - 6-4-3
Providence Academy - 9-3-1
Marshall - 11-3-1
iceman23
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:11 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by iceman23 »

BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

What is that link for the Minnhock SOS?? I've seen it but can't remember where it is.

That may have some bearing on it for PS2, as well as the common opponent win/loss (BSM) and the SOS of that opponent. Just a thought.
As the FAQ says "1 game does not a season make"

Lee...care to chime in ??
crouching tiger
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:25 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by crouching tiger »

iceman23 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.
ive never heard of a "descent" team...so im not sure if that would help determine if I Falls is good or not.
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by east hockey »

crouching tiger wrote:
iceman23 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.
ive never heard of a "descent" team...so im not sure if that would help determine if I Falls is good or not.
Descent; you know, as opposed to an "ascent" team. Image

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
elliott70
Posts: 15767
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

STA is in descent; as opposed to the ascent of Duluth TopoftheHill.
elliott70
Posts: 15767
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

But both teams are decent.
7A22A
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:37 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by 7A22A »

BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by BIAFP »

7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
PuckRanger
Posts: 1829
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Iron Range
Contact:

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by PuckRanger »

BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
The Muskies are not to be taken lightly, they are 28-6 at this point of their season. They lost to Madison Edgewood by the same score that Duluth Marshall did in the Hilltopper Classic holiday tournament and they have blown out many Minnesota opponents this year and competes very closely with Shattuck-St. Mary's. This is a pretty good hockey team, folks.
7A22A
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:37 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by 7A22A »

PuckRanger wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
The Muskies are not to be taken lightly, they are 28-6 at this point of their season. They lost to Madison Edgewood by the same score that Duluth Marshall did in the Hilltopper Classic holiday tournament and they have blown out many Minnesota opponents this year and competes very closely with Shattuck-St. Mary's. This is a pretty good hockey team, folks.
Just to clarify. SSM Midget team. I've seen them too.
7A22A
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:37 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by 7A22A »

BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
Actually, I prefer Lake of the Woods.
theref
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:52 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by theref »

BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
He obviously doesn't understand how the whole American-Canadian Exhange rate works. Every cheapshot the Falls takes, the Fort gets to retaliate with two :D .......forgot that the exhange rate is bad until just now. There is something "different" about playing over there though. Very tough building to play in against a very good team.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

It would be funny if that were remotely close to true. The US-Canadian exchange rate is, and has been for quite some time now, 1:1.
theref
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:52 pm

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Post by theref »

theref wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote: I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
He obviously doesn't understand how the whole American-Canadian Exhange rate works. Every cheapshot the Falls takes, the Fort gets to retaliate with two :D .......forgot that the exhange rate is bad until just now. There is something "different" about playing over there though. Very tough building to play in against a very good team.
Good call, go back under your rock now. :roll:
Post Reply