Who will win the S.E.C?!

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Take your pick.

White Bear Lake
15
35%
Cretin - Derhan Hall
4
9%
Roseville
3
7%
Stillwater
0
No votes
Park - Cottage Grove
0
No votes
Woodbury
13
30%
Hastings
5
12%
Mounds view
3
7%
 
Total votes: 43

HD1
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:20 am

Post by HD1 »

All three are playing on Saturday. The article is wrong.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

HD1 wrote:All three are playing on Saturday. The article is wrong.
That makes sense that they are only missing the one game. I've never heard of a game misconduct and having to sit out two games.
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Post by formerlybackofnet »

wbmd wrote:
HD1 wrote:All three are playing on Saturday. The article is wrong.
That makes sense that they are only missing the one game. I've never heard of a game misconduct and having to sit out two games.
A game msconduct is a game and game penality. ( the game you are in plus the next game.) or 2 games. If the penality occured after the end of regulation, it could be the next 2 games. that may well be what hapened in this case.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

formerlybackofnet wrote:
wbmd wrote:
HD1 wrote:All three are playing on Saturday. The article is wrong.
That makes sense that they are only missing the one game. I've never heard of a game misconduct and having to sit out two games.
A game msconduct is a game and game penality. ( the game you are in plus the next game.) or 2 games. If the penality occured after the end of regulation, it could be the next 2 games. that may well be what hapened in this case.
It seems that nobody is really sure if they are sitting out 2 full games or just one. I guess we'll just have to wait and see Saturday night.

Actually, (I'm not positive on this) I think it is two games out. What I remember back from 1998 in the state consolation semifinals between Edina and White Bear, there was a fight at the end of game and two players from Edina missed the consolation championship game and two from White Bear missed at least the first game of the following season.

Anybody know for sure on the official ruling?
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

I am possitive they will be playing saturday. The refs counted the Woodbury game as a game so Hastings will count as their second game. I have talked to the players on the team and they will be playing saturday. Although, just being honest, it is Moundsview so hopefully it won't matter much..
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

I trust that the squad isn't looking past Hastings or MV. Both are capable.
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

who_b_dat wrote:I trust that the squad isn't looking past Hastings or MV. Both are capable.
Well they definitly didn't look past Hastings. It does seem sometimes that they get cocky and over look teams when they think they should win. It happened against Park and even Roseville. I don't know why they felt so confident against a team like Roseville but they did. Hopefully they will come out to play against Moundsview and beat them like they should.
the water
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:05 pm

were you there?

Post by the water »

codemode wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:If the Bears have 3 players sit out a total of 2 games The blue mitten boys get off with nothing. This is a joke. I was there, the blue mitten boys didn't get jumped from behind. It takes two to tango.
Also - I dunno how many times I can state that the fact that Woodbury didn't get anything for their participation in the brawl, is a load of crap. Someone should explain to me why the suspensions were so lopsided. Granted, more of our players were involved but still, at least a suspension or two should have been tossed to the Royals.
i was there white bear clears the bench and then the goalie comes over and jumps on a guy ? come on now and woodbury was just trying to get there guys out
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

Woodbury was not just trying to get there guys out. They had players that wanted to come over and jump in after their frusturating loss. And White Bear also had a lot of kids being held back their bench was no where near being cleared. Its over and done with but it is a little ridiculous that no one from Woodbury got suspended.
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

I hope Woodbury takes it.. [-o< [-o< [-o<
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

Woodbury is just too inconsistent to win this conference. I think it will come down to WB having a one or two game lead over them going into the last game of the year, which I believe WB should win. The Bears are looking very good as of late and won't have any more "Park games."
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

SECHockeyFan wrote:Woodbury is just too inconsistent to win this conference. I think it will come down to WB having a one or two game lead over them going into the last game of the year, which I believe WB should win. The Bears are looking very good as of late and won't have any more "Park games."
Is Dane Erickson hurt. I don't think he played against the White Bear. When I saw Woodbury earlier in the year their 2nd line with Erickson was as good as the Eddy line. I really like Walker Hyland on D as well. Is he a sophmore?
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

I'm not sure what's going on with Erickson, but, yes, Hyland is a sophomore.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

SECHockeyFan wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with Erickson, but, yes, Hyland is a sophomore.
MGoBlue



Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 12

Posted: 27 Dec 2007 10:15 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woodbury lost a good forward Dane Erickson (broken thumb) in yesterdays game against Eagan. Should still have enough firepower to take care of SSP...6-3 Royals.
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

wbmd wrote:
SECHockeyFan wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with Erickson, but, yes, Hyland is a sophomore.
MGoBlue



Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 12

Posted: 27 Dec 2007 10:15 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woodbury lost a good forward Dane Erickson (broken thumb) in yesterdays game against Eagan. Should still have enough firepower to take care of SSP...6-3 Royals.
SSP? Woodbury plays Park tonight.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

SECHockeyFan wrote:
wbmd wrote:
SECHockeyFan wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with Erickson, but, yes, Hyland is a sophomore.
MGoBlue



Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 12

Posted: 27 Dec 2007 10:15 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woodbury lost a good forward Dane Erickson (broken thumb) in yesterdays game against Eagan. Should still have enough firepower to take care of SSP...6-3 Royals.
SSP? Woodbury plays Park tonight.
Note that the copied post is from Dec. 27th during the Holiday Tournaments.
Post Reply