Park Rapids vs. Thief River Falls - Jan. 24

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:25 pm

SiouxRecruit wrote:
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:I'm going with TRF by 3...Angus Young care to talk hockey and make a prediction or are you just going to be The Master-Baiter as usual.
hahahahahahahahahahaha....

and schwang....I dont know if there is any more threads to post.....thats ALL I think about and I still cant come up with one

New thread?
How good will PR be in 08-09?
Sorry, Sue, just could not help myself.
Go PR! Undefeated in 07-08!

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:27 pm

schwang17 wrote:
Irishmans Shanty wrote:Where will they stand if PR has four guys out of the lineup and TRF beats them 6-5 in overtime?
They will stand 17-1...

"Oh I'm sorry, the correct response should have been #5"

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:34 pm

Irishmans Shanty wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
Irishmans Shanty wrote:Where will they stand if PR has four guys out of the lineup and TRF beats them 6-5 in overtime?
They will stand 17-1...

"Oh I'm sorry, the correct response should have been #5"

"What is #5?"

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:36 pm

elliott70 wrote:
Irishmans Shanty wrote:
schwang17 wrote: They will stand 17-1...

"Oh I'm sorry, the correct response should have been #5"
"What is #5?"

It's teen week, they're bending the rules.

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:37 pm

Irishmans Shanty wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
Irishmans Shanty wrote:

"Oh I'm sorry, the correct response should have been #5"
"What is #5?"

It's teen week, they're bending the rules.

What?

AngusYoung · Post by **AngusYoung** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:40 pm

Thanks for the warning, Chief. So much for anonymity - why don't you just give the list to everybody since there is no privacy protection. Give the list to Elliott, he gives it PB, who gives it to IS - it'll be anarchy! Further, if you have an issue with calling people by their names, you better get a new handle.

Go PR!

AY

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:41 pm

SiouxRecruit wrote:
Irishmans Shanty wrote:
elliott70 wrote: "What is #5?"

It's teen week, they're bending the rules.
What?

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:45 pm

elliott70 wrote:
SiouxRecruit wrote:
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:I'm going with TRF by 3...Angus Young care to talk hockey and make a prediction or are you just going to be The Master-Baiter as usual.
hahahahahahahahahahaha....

and schwang....I dont know if there is any more threads to post.....thats ALL I think about and I still cant come up with one
New thread?
How good will PR be in 08-09?
Sorry, Sue, just could not help myself.
Go PR! Undefeated in 07-08!

Elliot....ur funny

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:54 pm

AngusYoung wrote:Thanks for the warning, Chief. So much for anonymity - why don't you just give the list to everybody since there is no privacy protection. Give the list to Elliott, he gives it PB, who gives it to IS - it'll be anarchy! Further, if you have an issue with calling people by their names, you better get a new handle.

Go PR!

AY

Have not hid it from the beginning.
If I felt that I and others would be better served by an anonymous post, I would use another name. I do not feel the need for it.

Wild4hockey · Post by **Wild4hockey** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:02 pm

the art of digression is an act that has been perfected on this "bored" I should start keeping statistics of well intentioned threads that get lead astray.

BIAFP · Post by **BIAFP** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:02 pm

elliott70 wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:Thanks for the warning, Chief. So much for anonymity - why don't you just give the list to everybody since there is no privacy protection. Give the list to Elliott, he gives it PB, who gives it to IS - it'll be anarchy! Further, if you have an issue with calling people by their names, you better get a new handle.

Go PR!

AY
Have not hid it from the beginning.
If I felt that I and others would be better served by an anonymous post, I would use another name. I do not feel the need for it.

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:11 pm

elliott70 wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:Thanks for the warning, Chief. So much for anonymity - why don't you just give the list to everybody since there is no privacy protection. Give the list to Elliott, he gives it PB, who gives it to IS - it'll be anarchy! Further, if you have an issue with calling people by their names, you better get a new handle.

Go PR!

AY
Have not hid it from the beginning.
If I felt that I and others would be better served by an anonymous post, I would use another name. I do not feel the need for it.

My name was used today...im not sure how this person found it out...but im ok with it....

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:14 pm

But back on track....i need to think of a new thread haha

AngusYoung · Post by **AngusYoung** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:32 pm

BIAFP wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:Thanks for the warning, Chief. So much for anonymity - why don't you just give the list to everybody since there is no privacy protection. Give the list to Elliott, he gives it PB, who gives it to IS - it'll be anarchy! Further, if you have an issue with calling people by their names, you better get a new handle.

Go PR!

AY
Have not hid it from the beginning.
If I felt that I and others would be better served by an anonymous post, I would use another name. I do not feel the need for it.

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!

Whatever you say, Billy from Erskine.

AY

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:55 pm

alright I did it...it seems to be popular...although it has nothing to do with PR

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:27 am

SiouxRecruit wrote:alright I did it...it seems to be popular...although it has nothing to do with PR

Well, it just ain't the same then. PR threads bring out the best posters and offers the most hostility...

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:05 am

Is Park Rapids the real deal? Or are they overrated a bit? I haven't seen them play yet this year so I want to hear from some of the people that know them best.

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:22 am

ap4mvp wrote:Is Park Rapids the real deal? Or are they overrated a bit? I haven't seen them play yet this year so I want to hear from some of the people that know them best.

For the most part their schedule is not difficult.
They have an excellent first-line centerman in Zach Lehrke, who will play D1.
He is flanked by two hard-working forwards who are benefitted by Lehrke's abilities - Winkler & cannot remember #2 right now.
Zach Knapp, the second line center is a good hockey player.
Tolle on D is very solid. Few mistakes, passes the puick up the ice very well. His partner, cannot remember his name, limits his mistakes.
McMorrow on D is a sophomore, but is quick/fast and decent hands.
He has the ability to score.
Goaltender is above average.

TRF goaltender, Gothberg(SP), can stop pucks.
TRF has a lot of good sophs that have picked up the varsity game and cement their team. So TRF will have more depth, TRF has solid D & goaltender that can limit PR's scoring.
I believe it will be a game of match-ups. Wrong combo will cause a team to win/lose. TRF has a better coach in that department (at this point of their careers) and more depth to work with.

Advantage TRF.

But the game is on the ice and it should be good.
So that is why I am plannng on being there.

sinbombyzermancurve · Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:58 am

elliott70 wrote:
ap4mvp wrote:Is Park Rapids the real deal? Or are they overrated a bit? I haven't seen them play yet this year so I want to hear from some of the people that know them best.
For the most part their schedule is not difficult.
They have an excellent first-line centerman in Zach Lehrke, who will play D1.
He is flanked by two hard-working forwards who are benefitted by Lehrke's abilities - Winkler & cannot remember #2 right now.
Zach Knapp, the second line center is a good hockey player.
Tolle on D is very solid. Few mistakes, passes the puick up the ice very well. His partner, cannot remember his name, limits his mistakes.
McMorrow on D is a sophomore, but is quick/fast and decent hands.
He has the ability to score.
Goaltender is above average.

TRF goaltender, Gothberg(SP), can stop pucks.
TRF has a lot of good sophs that have picked up the varsity game and cement their team. So TRF will have more depth, TRF has solid D & goaltender that can limit PR's scoring.
I believe it will be a game of match-ups. Wrong combo will cause a team to win/lose. TRF has a better coach in that department (at this point of their careers) and more depth to work with.

Advantage TRF.

But the game is on the ice and it should be good.
So that is why I am plannng on being there.

pretty good assessment in my eyes...although lehrke doesn't play with winkler

cuda701 · Post by **cuda701** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:06 pm

PR by 2

hawkfan70 · Post by **hawkfan70** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:11 pm

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:although lehrke doesn't play with winkler

thats not what i heard

sinbombyzermancurve · Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:13 pm

hawkfan70 wrote:
sinbombyzermancurve wrote:although lehrke doesn't play with winkler
thats not what i heard

last few games i have watched(very recently) he has played with hensel and coborn.

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:16 pm

Unless he's playing with Sydney Crosby, PR isn't going to beat TRF- So what's the difference?

newsguy35 · Post by **newsguy35** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:33 pm

SB24 wrote:Unless he's playing with Sydney Crosby, PR isn't going to beat TRF- So what's the difference?

Even if PR had Sidney Crosby he would be useless... Messed up ankle remember?

hawkfan70 · Post by **hawkfan70** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:41 pm

if they played completely offensively, would that guarantee a win?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Park Rapids vs. Thief River Falls - Jan. 24

Who will win?

pr-trf